Chris Noble Posted 15 August , 2010 Share Posted 15 August , 2010 Thanks for posting the link Glen. Chris. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyrim Posted 16 August , 2010 Share Posted 16 August , 2010 If there are still concerns about the cost and difficulty of identifying WWI soldier's remains from 90 years ago, the link below seems to indicate that it's not a concern for these investigators of an apparent mass murder that occurred 180 years ago. http://www.belfastte...h-14912817.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PBI Posted 16 August , 2010 Share Posted 16 August , 2010 http://www.civilwarnews.com/archive/articles/hunley_study.htm The Americans seem to put more effort into bringing their "Missing" in from the Cold. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrisharley9 Posted 16 August , 2010 Share Posted 16 August , 2010 See the latest issue of After The Battle. An RAF airman from WW2 was indentified by DNA tests carried out by the RAF casualty branch in March 2008. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PBI Posted 16 August , 2010 Share Posted 16 August , 2010 Lets hope we dont hear anymore tired old Excuses from the MOD about their woeful lack of performance...to whit,The Afghanistan Farce,Lack of Money,Logistics,Time,more pressing matters,Blah,Blah,Blah. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted 17 August , 2010 Share Posted 17 August , 2010 Have recieved a reply from my MP Jo Swinson. She states that she has writen to the minister for defence personnel and veterans asking for assurance that the bodies will be DNA tested to aid identification. She will get back in touch once there is a reply. (should add this was recieved 26th july) Good reply recognising 'the need to preserve the dignity and memory of those who gave their lives in the great war' hope all the small bits of preasure have a cumulative and sucessfull outcome. james Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glosterman Posted 17 August , 2010 Share Posted 17 August , 2010 Have recieved a reply from my MP Jo Swinson. She states that she has writen to the minister for defence personnel and veterans asking for assurance that the bodies will be DNA tested to aid identification. She will get back in touch once there is a reply. (should add this was recieved 26th july) Good reply recognising 'the need to preserve the dignity and memory of those who gave their lives in the great war' hope all the small bits of preasure have a cumulative and sucessfull outcome. james If you want to know what Minister will say in response see post 136 onwards. It appears obvious to me the Govt are using a standard response to all letters received. KH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MelPack Posted 19 August , 2010 Author Share Posted 19 August , 2010 Thanks Chris (#174) and James (#181) for your confirmations. I have also received the stock response via my MP. Although I tend to agree with Seadog and PBI that all routes to securing an identification should be followed, I think that the lobbying has had the desired effect. Now that the matter has received public exposure and, the decision makers are aware of that, I cannot envisage the MoD being obliged to take any route other than DNA testing. With all the ifs and buts, Andrew Robathan's statement is about the best we are going to get short of the Minister signing a promissory note in his own blood. I would suggest that we should allow matters to rest at this point in terms of lobbying and monitor how the process unfolds. The work on the genealogy of the missing 58 soldiers is progressing well. I have established contact with close descendants of twenty of the soldiers already, many of whom are either DNA compatible themselves or are in contact with other relatives that are. The caveat in the statement of the Minister that ' DNA testing will be used, providing the list of potential casualties can be narrowed down to a reasonable number and suitable relatives can be traced to obtain DNA samples from' will not, therefore, be an impediment. Mel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyrim Posted 19 August , 2010 Share Posted 19 August , 2010 Excellent work Mel, The tighter the gap the less likely the powers that be will be able to wriggle through. Although, they will try. tyrim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfaulder Posted 19 August , 2010 Share Posted 19 August , 2010 Finally heard back from my MP's office; was beginning to wonder what was happening but to be fair to him he only got the (standard) response (from the Minister) a week ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keith Miller Posted 25 August , 2010 Share Posted 25 August , 2010 I too have received a reply from MOD through my MP, Brooks Newmark. Same as post 136. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MelPack Posted 8 September , 2010 Author Share Posted 8 September , 2010 The project has gone international: http://www.prpeak.com/articles/2010/09/08/news/doc4c86e42491bcb752483321.txt Mel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Noble Posted 8 September , 2010 Share Posted 8 September , 2010 This is a significant development Mel that reaches a 'wider audience. Best wishes, Chris. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MelPack Posted 11 September , 2010 Author Share Posted 11 September , 2010 Another article published this week in the Doncaster Free Press for the Donny lads: http://i887.photobucket.com/albums/ac71/fromelles/ZDoncaterfreepress10Sep10_0001.jpg Mel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deano Posted 11 September , 2010 Share Posted 11 September , 2010 Hi Mel, the Donny piece is repeated,without the images,in todays Sheffield Star as well. Dean. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyrim Posted 11 September , 2010 Share Posted 11 September , 2010 Excellent work all! There's real momentum to the project now. Let's keep it going. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MelPack Posted 16 September , 2010 Author Share Posted 16 September , 2010 A nice follow up to the Canadian article (# 187) here: http://www.prpeak.com/articles/2010/09/15/community/doc4c9015e316514269015325.txt Sgt. Dunn now has the full complement of DNA donors and relatives spanning three continents. Mel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tjap Posted 16 September , 2010 Share Posted 16 September , 2010 Fabulous work Mel. A guide to which of the 58 still require DNA donors would be helpful. Best, Howard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seadog Posted 6 November , 2010 Share Posted 6 November , 2010 Here is an extract from a MOD reply to my MP which was received in late October: Norman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seadog Posted 6 November , 2010 Share Posted 6 November , 2010 For information another 6 British soldiers have been found, this time in Belgium. GWF Topic Norman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seadog Posted 11 November , 2010 Share Posted 11 November , 2010 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfaulder Posted 11 November , 2010 Share Posted 11 November , 2010 Their Name Liveth For Evermore ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ianw Posted 11 November , 2010 Share Posted 11 November , 2010 They will be specifically be in my thoughts in an hour or so, this morning. We will Remember Them (some of them by name eventually, we hope) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MelPack Posted 11 November , 2010 Author Share Posted 11 November , 2010 Hello Norman I am disappointed by the reply that you have received from the Minister; not least because it is inconsistent with the previous stock response. The two personnel of the Historic Section of the SPVA do not deal with current casualties so there is no question of prioritising as suggested - or at least not in that context. As it stands, the only additional costs for identification will be the DNA testing of the remains and the matching of bloodline relatives. Relative contacts have been identified for 42 out of the 58 soldiers with 35 of the soldiers having appropriate donors found in at least one or the other of the DNA categories thus far. There is only one soldier whose family will never be traced because he enlisted under an alias and the information that he provided matches no records whatsoever. The rest are all perfectly traceable with hard work and persistence. Mel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seadog Posted 11 November , 2010 Share Posted 11 November , 2010 Hi Mel here is a further extract from the same letter. I cannot post the whole thing as it is in two pages and an upload will be difficult to read. The rest of the letter just contains the usual waffle about why the MOD do not publish details of the discoveries until any identification has been made, what a pity then that the recent finds in Belgium have been reported by the Belgian newspapers and even more so, a video is on the net!. Great work from you and others and I hope that it comes to fruition. Best Wishes Norman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now