per ardua per mare per terram Posted 27 January , 2007 Share Posted 27 January , 2007 Wasnt much though seeing they got themselves a submarine. gareth A submarine didn't cost much (relative to destroyers, cruisers and battleships) and his share was small. Some contemporary price comparisons for 1921-30 drawn from Dr Harold Priestley, 'the what it cost the day before yesterday book,' (Kenneth Mason, Havant, 1979). Pint of beer 6d (2 1/2p); so he could get 20 pints for 10 shillings. Cigarettes 20 for 1s (5p); 200 for 10 shillings. Rail fare (1928) London Euston-Manchester (189 miles) £1/5/8 (£1.28) presumably 2nd class, but not noted - definately open return. Ton of coal 30s (£1.50); 5 tons for £7/10/- (£7.50). 4 ft 6in oak bedstead (Waring and Gillow 1923) for £7/10/- (£7.50). Billiard Table for £7/15/- (£7.75). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
per ardua per mare per terram Posted 27 January , 2007 Share Posted 27 January , 2007 QUOTE (Phil_B @ Jan 27 2007, 11:20 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Must have been galling for the RFC man who shoots down several aircraft or the infantry unit that captures a town! Phil B It was ever thus! It was there in the Napoleonic Wars etc.; then the army supplimented their income by looting, which was frowned upon in the 20th century. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhilB Posted 27 January , 2007 Share Posted 27 January , 2007 Is prize money still active? Was there a payout for the Belgrano? Phil B Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshdoc Posted 27 January , 2007 Share Posted 27 January , 2007 So with his £7 10 00 he could have a bed or billiard table . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
per ardua per mare per terram Posted 27 January , 2007 Share Posted 27 January , 2007 Tough choice! That was a 4 1/4ftx2 1/4 foot table. For his full £12 10 shillings (interim and the final award) he could get a 6 1//4x3 1/4 ft table. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Lowrey Posted 27 January , 2007 Share Posted 27 January , 2007 A submarine didn't cost much (relative to destroyers, cruisers and battleships) and is share was small. Not necessarily, and size of vessel was not, in any case, what the pay out was based upon. U-boats ranged in size from the 127 ton (142 ton submerged) UBI type small coastal torpedo attack boats to 2115 ton (2760 dubmerged) U 142 class U-cruisers. The typical U-series diesel-powered torpedo attack boat were in the 650 to 830 ton range surfaced, 837 to 1000 tons submerged. The UCII and UBIII types based at Flanders (and elsewhere) were still 400 tons+ and 500 tons+ surfaced respectively. By comparison, a British "M" or "R" class destroyer displaced about 1,000 tons. Also, prize money was paid out at the rate £5 per (enemy) crew on board vessel sunk. Submarines, of course, have a relatively small crew for their displacement, thus the payout would be smaller than sinking, say, a destroyer. (There were also moneys paid out at a flat rate for a sinking a submarine.) Best wishes, Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamesbow Posted 29 January , 2007 Share Posted 29 January , 2007 found this whilst searching my fathers ship bacchante. jamesbow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhilB Posted 29 January , 2007 Share Posted 29 January , 2007 I`m really surprised that prize money was still being paid out then (& now?). In the case of ships sunk, which presumably the Heligoland Bight payment was for), did the money come from the taxpayer? Phil B Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bombadier Posted 1 February , 2007 Share Posted 1 February , 2007 My Grandfather's Certificate of Service shows:- Paid £12-10-0 Naval Prize Fund in Victory I 23 May 21 Paid 3/1 Jutland Prize Bounty (he was on Blanche which didn't fire a shot!) 19 Dec 23 Paid supplementary share Naval Prize Fund Hope this helps Nigel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhilB Posted 2 February , 2007 Share Posted 2 February , 2007 Jutland prize bounty? How come when we lost more ships than we sunk? Phil B Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibbo Posted 2 February , 2007 Share Posted 2 February , 2007 Prize money related to enemy casualties, not the difference between enemy & British casualties. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhilB Posted 2 February , 2007 Share Posted 2 February , 2007 Not much of an incentive to be economical with the King`s ships then? Phil B Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
per ardua per mare per terram Posted 2 February , 2007 Share Posted 2 February , 2007 Apart from the incentive that its a wet walk home if you mess up? Or if things really get fouled up there were a higher percentage of casualties from a lost ship than any infantry battalion had on 1/7/1916. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
per ardua per mare per terram Posted 2 February , 2007 Share Posted 2 February , 2007 Sorry for exagerating on the destroyers! As no one has answered the one about prize money still being active, I will take a stab although I can't find the reference and only have a hazy idea! I think that prize money was phased out in the reforms (bloody axe job) of the 1920s, when they revised all pay rates and conditions of service. Otherwise the Swordfish crews at Toranto would have been rolling in it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
londons Posted 19 August , 2007 Share Posted 19 August , 2007 Hi All, My great grandfather was a CPO based out of Chatham Dock Yard. His Naval record mentions prize monies being awarded on various occasions. Someone told me that one of the reasons for the award was if his ship had been within sight of a naval battle? Could someone confirm the reasons why prize money was given? Many thanks, Lee Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
submarine Posted 22 August , 2007 Share Posted 22 August , 2007 Dear All In "The Fleet Annual and Naval year book " 1917. Page 29 In the Prize court on Monday , December 11th Commander Edwards , of HM torpedo-boat destroyer "Laforey" with the Officers and ships companies of three other Torpedo-boat destroyers ,claimed prize bounty for the sinking of two Germany torpedo-boats in the North Sea on May 1st 1915. It goes on to say that there where at least 32 persons on each of the Enemy vessels, and awarded £320 tobe shared between the four vessels. So that makes an enemy Sailor worth about £5 ?. Colin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robwilliams Posted 23 August , 2007 Share Posted 23 August , 2007 I have the medals of an RNR sailor who served on an AMC and was present at the sinking of the SMS Dresden, he got prize money for that, 16/1 to be exact. But his record appears to show that he continued to receive further payments after the war and received a further total of £33/15/-. Rob Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
per ardua per mare per terram Posted 23 August , 2007 Share Posted 23 August , 2007 Rob That was a considerable amount of money. It would have been a combination of the AMC and naval prize funds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1RGLI Posted 24 January , 2008 Share Posted 24 January , 2008 Plenty of discriptions in the London Gazette if you select WW1 and put exact phrase as PRIZE MONEY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Signals Posted 25 January , 2008 Share Posted 25 January , 2008 Hi All, Prize Money. I have been looking into this recently. It was certainly active in WW1. It was 5 pounds per enemy sailor killed, also known as blood money. The one i specifically was looking into was probabily the most profitable example i know of in WW1. In October 1915 the British submarine E8 torpedoed and sank the German cruiser Prinz Adalbert in the Baltic. She lost 600 odd crew. So at 5 pounds x 600, this was shared with E8's 30 British crew and 3 Russian crew, this earned them a very tidy amount. Her commander Lt Cdr Francis Goodhart had to set up a trust fund to distribut the money, he whent through HMS Maidstones agents Holts. This was a very slow process and the amount of 3000 pounds was announced for E8's crew in late 1916. In fact when Goodhart was killed on the new sub K13 in January 1917 he was still waiting on the money but had increase his debt in anticipation of the pendng sum. This of course was an attraction for being on submarines, small crew capable of sinking a ship with a possible crew of 1000 adds up to a lot of money. While looking E8's crew also recieved money for the German losses at Heligoland Bight in 1914, so it would seem all vessels present at an engagement look as though they made a claim. The submarines E19 and E9 also made claims for the merchant vessels that sank in the Baltic even with no loss of life, so it was obviously not restricted to enemy crews killed. On the England National Archive site, punch in Prize Bounties and see what they come up with, as they still have many court documents dealing with this. I looked up PRIZE BOUNTIES SUBMARINES to find E8's. Unfortunately i was hoping to find a list of individuals who received the money, proving if the chap in question was actually on the submarine when the event occurred. There is no list, just details of the court case. If you pull a crew mans papers from the national archive site it will not have these details either. The papers that do have this information are the actual papers carried by the rating himself, but they can be hard to find unless you know a relative with them. Hope this is of interest, Darren. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toms girl Posted 25 January , 2008 Share Posted 25 January , 2008 I have notes of the following:- paid money for the destruction of German sub 11.3.18 11/4d paid from prize fund £2.00 16.6.1918 several more in 22 and 23 regards Margarette Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
milford_lass Posted 27 March , 2010 Share Posted 27 March , 2010 e name='Margarette' date='Jan 25 2008, 12:44 PM' post='845982'] I have notes of the following:- paid money for the destruction of German sub 11.3.18 11/4d paid from prize fund £2.00 16.6.1918 several more in 22 and 23 regards Margarette ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- my Great Uncle Ernest left his Prize Money to his Grandfather and adopted mother, they both received in 2/11/1920, £6 : 5s /d he joined 11/8/1914 and died 20/8/1917 shirl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now