marina Posted 5 January , 2008 Share Posted 5 January , 2008 Why, thank you, Tom - I do love Twinklies! Marina Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris_Baker Posted 13 March , 2008 Share Posted 13 March , 2008 I now have a book to add to this list that I can honestly say is the the worst book I have ever read on the subject. My review is here: http://www.1914-1918.net/books/greatestday.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truthergw Posted 13 March , 2008 Share Posted 13 March , 2008 I looked at Amazon's blurb and didn't fancy it. Seems I was right. I wonder who it is aimed at and why he didn't write something else? Will there be a market for it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PBI Posted 13 March , 2008 Author Share Posted 13 March , 2008 Bought Norman Gladdens "Ypres 1917" on the Strength of this Advice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest AWOL Posted 15 March , 2008 Share Posted 15 March , 2008 ...Harry Being Temperate... Hi, I'm a bit confused. Can someone tell me what this old gent is to do with books. Regards Peter ...Harry Being Temperate... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truthergw Posted 15 March , 2008 Share Posted 15 March , 2008 Sometimes a thread can get slightly sidetracked and I seem to remember this was a case in point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest AWOL Posted 15 March , 2008 Share Posted 15 March , 2008 Thankyou I have reread the thread and think I understand. I agree with some others on Sebastian Faulkes and Birdsong. I bought the book on strength of Charlotte Grey but I am disappointed. I also skipped some large chunks in the chapter so I hope I haven't missed anything important. Regards Peter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truthergw Posted 15 March , 2008 Share Posted 15 March , 2008 I doubt if you would have skipped it if it was important. The important parts of a book demand to be read. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stripeyman Posted 15 March , 2008 Share Posted 15 March , 2008 So, back to the thread........In the last centuary I was asked to become a book reveiwer for Stand To! My first and only book that I reveiwed was Mr Laffins 'Panorama of the Western Front' This was an appalling book on a certain French chappie who had a large panoramic painting/drawing of the Western Front. It was from the North Sea to Swiss border looking towards the German lines as if from 500 -1000 ft. The item itself was err OK... but the book content and photographs were abysmal. My comments were so servier that I was sacked by the then hirearchy of the WFA and have not reveiwed anything since. Does anyone remember this book? I do not have it now as I gave it away, it was that bad. Sorry for the spelling......... Bob Grundy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truthergw Posted 16 March , 2008 Share Posted 16 March , 2008 I have a paperback copy. I bought it online in the early days of my interest when the name of the author meant nothing to me. I sometimes look at it and wonder why a publisher would so risk their reputation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PBI Posted 16 March , 2008 Author Share Posted 16 March , 2008 Try reading Mr.Laffins totally Unbiased Book " British Butchers and Bunglers of WW1"..Words Fail Me on How this "Book" was allowed to be published in the First Place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arras100 Posted 27 March , 2008 Share Posted 27 March , 2008 "Birdsong" gets my vote as one of the worst. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PBI Posted 27 March , 2008 Author Share Posted 27 March , 2008 I will Second That,..Your DVD is on its Way,I Posted it last Sunday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ypresman Posted 16 May , 2008 Share Posted 16 May , 2008 Can I just say...the worst book to date I have ever read is ............The Battle of Cambrai..The Battlefields Today Sorry Ian Saunders, but for the price(£17.00) and information within this 'book' ...this is the worst ever in my 350+ library. You have full A4 pages with only half of it filled with poor B&W photocopies and no text to fill the rest of the page. Some of the pages are a complete blank. Then you have full pages of poor photocopies of writing on memorials, with no explanation. Half pages with poor pics (all pics in B&W and very poorly scanned), without any explanation, full pages, half pages with just pics of shadows...no explantion, no history behind the pics or indeed the battle itself. Wish I could show the pics without infringing the copyright. I just don't know what this book is trying to achieve!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PBI Posted 17 May , 2008 Author Share Posted 17 May , 2008 Mr.Saunders "Book" gets a Very Poor Review in Amazons Books Section.Maybe you could sell your unwanted copy on Amazon or E-Bay ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ypresman Posted 18 May , 2008 Share Posted 18 May , 2008 Tried it...no-one wants it! Wish I never bought of Amazon...one of my few mistakes in life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Hederer Posted 18 May , 2008 Share Posted 18 May , 2008 Tried it...no-one wants it! Wish I never bought of Amazon...one of my few mistakes in life. Wow, if buying that book is one of your biggest mistakes in life you're way ahead of me! Paul Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ypresman Posted 18 May , 2008 Share Posted 18 May , 2008 Never said it was one of my biggest mistakes in life. You stated that. I said "one of my few mistakes in life"....as I don't have many. As you don't know me, I will not elaborate. Obviously then ...I must be way ahead of you. Have you 'read' this book? Care to give me your feedback on this said book? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Hederer Posted 19 May , 2008 Share Posted 19 May , 2008 Never said it was one of my biggest mistakes in life. You stated that. I said "one of my few mistakes in life"....as I don't have many. As you don't know me, I will not elaborate. Obviously then ...I must be way ahead of you. Have you 'read' this book? Care to give me your feedback on this said book? Never made the mistake of reading it I'm afraid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martin Bennitt Posted 2 June , 2008 Share Posted 2 June , 2008 Ive just finished Billy Bishop's 'Winged Warfare', described as a classic of World War I, but it ain't in my view. Okay, so it was presumably done as a morale-booster towards the end of 1917, and one must make allowances, notably the way it doen't reveal much in the way of names, places, aircraft types, etc. but it's really just one long boring line-shoot taken from his log-book, and terribly badly written at that. Being aware of the controversy surrounding many of Bishop's claims, I was looking for holes, and found plenty. Read it as a curio if you must, or if you're a hunter of first edtitions -- I found it in a library -- but otherwise don't bother. cheers Martin B Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geraint Posted 19 December , 2008 Share Posted 19 December , 2008 As an avid reader of this topic ( I hardly read anything else) I'm absolutely p***ed off with the Voices of..; Last of... regurgitation books swamping the popular book stores. I DO NOT WANT TO READ any other compilation book of those poor sods in nursing homes talking to some 'author' 80 years after the event. No more; please no more! Can any one tell publishers that this is a no no market? Now if a diary written during the war, lying in an attic chest untouched for nintey years, turned up - that would be different! But bandwaggon jumping hacks, with an eye for a fast buck on the back of recordings done by these poor old blokes in the last twenty years is too much! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nigelcave Posted 19 December , 2008 Share Posted 19 December , 2008 I have to admit to a strong dislike of the Mosier book - I think it has a lot to do with the hype that greeted its publication. I did actually get around to going through it for Review purposes (for the late Alf Peackock's excellent journal, Gunfire). I got to about page 80 and I was trying to be as balanced as possible, as I think the statement with the title - How the Germans won the battles and the Americans won the war - had some merit, at least in academic, discussion, sort f way - ie what do yo mean by 'won' the battles and 'won' the war. My gripe lay in the number of unforced errors - he complains about the Britsh and teh French could not get their act together and illustrates this by saying that they called the same battle by different names - ie Mons and Guise! He seems to have overlooked the fact that they were not only miles apart and fought a week apart, but that even the Germans called these engagments by dfferent names (and the result of Guise was very important). He talks about a place called Aubersville Ridge - I mean these are ridiculous elementary errors, which cast doubts on what otherwise might be a potentially interesting perspectve. On the other hand, I now consider it a good book for people to check their knowledge of facts (and I mean facts and not interpretations or viewpoints). I must try and dig up that review again! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MartinWills Posted 19 December , 2008 Share Posted 19 December , 2008 As an avid reader of this topic ( I hardly read anything else) I'm absolutely p***ed off with the Voices of..; Last of... regurgitation books swamping the popular book stores. I DO NOT WANT TO READ any other compilation book of those poor sods in nursing homes talking to some 'author' 80 years after the event. No more; please no more! Can any one tell publishers that this is a no no market? Now if a diary written during the war, lying in an attic chest untouched for nintey years, turned up - that would be different! But bandwaggon jumping hacks, with an eye for a fast buck on the back of recordings done by these poor old blokes in the last twenty years is too much! These books do provide an easy entry for many to the war and should be welcomed in that respect but they do tend to recycle the same or similar material - sometimes out of context. They tend, also to produce a far from balanced view being based on the interviews that are available rather than providing the full picture. Basically if there are no surviving veterans (or interviews) those aspects are simply "dropped". None the less, I get fed up with this market as well as there is often very little that can be learn't from these volumes. One minor point, I do think it is gratuitous to refer to elderly veterans in nursing homes as ****. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Staffsyeoman Posted 19 December , 2008 Share Posted 19 December , 2008 I am with Geraint on the "Forgotten Voices" series, I'm afraid. Many of them cause a conjunction of the terms "money", "old" and "rope". Lazy may be too harsh a term, but a charge of complacency can be levelled. They are a movement onwards from the rush of long lost diaries being published (some of which were, I regret to say, were somewhat banal) as it seemed that every publisher had to have one. At least Mr Arthur had the good grace not to call his last tome "Forgotten Voices" (of) The Dambusters... Martin's right - recycling a key factor; lack of context omnipresent and a lucrative (and cheap!) thread for some publishers. Let's not encourage them and save their budgets for genuine, new work. Just one comment - I did some training in interviewing veterans in the early 80s when my university department was interviewing local veterans of the WW2 desert battles. Beware hindsight and the weight of popular opinion. I think that is what Geraint was getting at, not slighting veterans per se. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven Broomfield Posted 19 December , 2008 Share Posted 19 December , 2008 I DO NOT WANT TO READ any other compilation book of those poor sods in nursing homes talking to some 'author' 80 years after the event. I've expressed my view on these things elsewhere, but I'd disagree with this comment: I'm not sure the authors actually spoke to anyone. They just trawled the archive and cut and pasted the bits that sounded good. Then quoted it out of context, with no background, no checking...nothing. Just sit back and wait for the cheque. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now