Krithia Posted 22 April , 2006 Share Posted 22 April , 2006 In his Introduction, the author goes a long way out on a very slender limb, by claiming: 'By the start of the First World War the Victorian Full Dress uniform of scarlet, blue or green was virtually obsolete. A Special Army Order declared that Service Dress was to be worn by all ranks for all purposes, except ceremonial guard' This is not true, and may be based on a misconception. Thanks Joe for clarifying this point to Grumpy, this was true. The answer was in the sentence "By the start of the First World War", which, if I remember correctly was 1914. To confirm it was the order AO/292 of August 1914 as you state. There are numerous photos of the period 1902 to 1914 that show Full Dress in use, a few are in Chapter One of the book. After the beginning of the war you see very few examples in photos. Of the physical item I have seen many actual examples of the dress with dates right up to and including 1914, but funny enough none after. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muerrisch Posted 23 April , 2006 Share Posted 23 April , 2006 Two things threw me: 'Victorian' [when we had shot past Edward to George, in which periods the tunic had had several considerable changes] and 'by' rather than 'at' the start of the war. 292 was one of a stack of AOs which, I suspect, were all typed out ready to issue on declaration. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
auchonvillerssomme Posted 27 April , 2006 Share Posted 27 April , 2006 I have recently purchased this book, excellent. Mick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now