RaySearching Posted 27 February , 2021 Share Posted 27 February , 2021 Medal Roll shows discharged from duty 25/9/19 (class Z reserves He has a WFA pension card which indicates that he received a pension till 1931 so no post war service Its looking highly unlikely that the soldier in the photo is Ernest Ray Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ss002d6252 Posted 27 February , 2021 Share Posted 27 February , 2021 8 minutes ago, GoldenMan said: I am starting to think that the four medals my relative has could well be the key. I have seen the medal card that shows two medals being awarded. Thank you all. Well, so far, Ernest has entitlement only to 2 medals so we'd need details of the other medals. Craig Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PRC Posted 27 February , 2021 Share Posted 27 February , 2021 8 minutes ago, RaySearching said: 1939 register confirms the date of birth as 1st May 1897 Not strictly true that it is confirmed - dates of birth on the 1939 Register were not verified, so it's appearance on the Register simply tells us that was the information given. Of course the Register went on to be used during the war for the issue of ID cards and rations books, then post 1948 by the NHS as their central registry, so if someone chose to give a false date of birth later on down the line it could cause issues, leading to the register being corrected. But that is of course if it is picked up on - the shorter the period of time the person lived post September 1939, the less likely it would come to light. So d.o.b on the 1939 Register is a good source, because there is a self-correcting mechanism of sorts, but it's not perfect. Same with death certificates. If the informant can't supply documentary evidence as to date of birth then they sign a declaration that the information supplied is correct to the best of their knowledge. So usual rule - primary sources are good , but you just need to be aware of the potential flaws (And apologies if I've misinterpreted what you have written). Cheers, Perer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaySearching Posted 27 February , 2021 Share Posted 27 February , 2021 Ernest has service papers on Ancestry (LINK) should also be available on Find My Past Should be interesting reading for the O.P deserted at one point and returned to service Ray Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaySearching Posted 27 February , 2021 Share Posted 27 February , 2021 As Peter has pointed out The date of birth 1st May 1896 maybe the date of birth that he believed was the date that he was born He may or may not, have known, precisely when he was born, times were hard at the turn of the century more important things to worry about like earning enough money to survive than the exact date that you were born He is shown on the 1901 census with his parents Ernest and Julia aged 5 on the 1911 census with his parents aged 15 so born 1896 or thereabouts Which leaves the question who is the officer cadet in the photo ? which you believed to be your grandfather Ray Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charlie962 Posted 28 February , 2021 Share Posted 28 February , 2021 18 hours ago, RaySearching said: Ernest has service papers on Ancestry (LINK) should also be available on Find My Past see prev posts on first page ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaySearching Posted 28 February , 2021 Share Posted 28 February , 2021 5 minutes ago, charlie962 said: see prev posts on first page ! I think I must have been exposed to the Nile Virus Regards Ray Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FROGSMILE Posted 28 February , 2021 Share Posted 28 February , 2021 (edited) I agree that it does seem extremely unlikely that a private soldier in the infantry would begin training to be an officer in a branch of the Royal Artillery, unless perhaps he had passed some kind of aptitude test that made him suitable, and one would wonder why a man ostensibly with 3-years of overseas service would not be an NCO if considered potential officer material. The only thing that did bear consideration was that there must have been officer cadets still undergoing instruction and not yet commissioned at the time of the Armistice. I don’t know what the policy might have been, but imagine that school commandants would have sought guidance from the war office. Perhaps they were offered immediate discharge at their substantive rank, although considering the uncertainty regarding the deliberations at Versailles, and the men being discharged to the Z Reserve, that seems less likely. All-in-all I concur with everyone else that the officer cadet seems unlikely to be the same man as the inquirer thinks. Edited 28 February , 2021 by FROGSMILE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charlie962 Posted 28 February , 2021 Share Posted 28 February , 2021 5 minutes ago, FROGSMILE said: The only thing that did bear consideration was that there must have been officer cadets still undergoing instruction and not yet commissioned at the time of the Armistice. I'd thought about that but when I saw his record in 1918 there was no time out of detention to fit in even a quick officer's course. charlie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FROGSMILE Posted 28 February , 2021 Share Posted 28 February , 2021 41 minutes ago, charlie962 said: I'd thought about that but when I saw his record in 1918 there was no time out of detention to fit in even a quick officer's course. charlie Yes that makes sense Charlie, I missed the bit about detention. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PRC Posted 28 February , 2021 Share Posted 28 February , 2021 (edited) All, The more I look at it, the more convinced I an that there are two different individuals, both probably called Ernest Richards. The first is an officer cadet in a branch of the Royal Artillery. The provenance of this is a photograph, having been passed down from mother to son, and the individual concerned being at least verbally identified as her father – the posters maternal grandfather. He is believed to have been gassed at some point. He is believed to have received 4 medals. The photograph of him as an officer cadet shows him with three overseas chevrons, so at least 2 years overseas. There are no photograpker details, etc, on the back of the photograph. No officer record or London Gazette entry for commissioning found so far – but full birth name still to be confirmed. He died when OPs’ mother was 11 years old. He has been identified as born 1st May 1897 at Middlesbrough, but the OP hasn’t confirmed where that information has come from and looking increasingly like it relates to the second individual. ~~~~~~~~~@~~~~~~~~~ The second man served in the ranks as Yorkshire Regiment 27988 then Dorsetshire Regiment 46746. Some of his service records have survived and indicate a poor disciplinary history, including desertion, with parts(?) of 1918 served in detention. (Ancestry have them split under 27988 for enlistment and 46745 for discharge). He qualified for the British War Medal and the Victory Medal, having landed overseas in a theatre of war on the 13th October 1916. OP has the medals and these show “Private E Richards 27988 York R”. He was discharged to Class “Z” Reserve on the 25th September 1919 still in the ranks. Address on discharge was 28 Calthorpe Street, Middlesbrough. He married a Catherine McCabe in 1920. (Civil marriage records shows this Ernest with no middle names). 1939 register shows him residing at 13 Essex Street, Middlesbrough and he was incapacitated. It is his date of birth that is shown as 1st May 1897. Is there anything on the surviving records to indicate where he was born and who his next of kin where? There is no provenance so far as to how those medals came into the OP’s possession. Thank you to @Michelle Young , @ss002d6252 , @Polar Bear , @charlie962 , and @RaySearching for the information included above – any errors and miscomprehension are likely to be mine. One thing we have from the OP is that his maternal grandfather died when his mother was 11, and we know from the 1939 Register that the man believe to be the other ranks Ernest Richards was still alive when it was taken on the 29th September 1939. Likely births registered in the Middlesbrough District with the surname Richards, mothers’ maiden name McCabe. Q1 1921 Winifred Richards Q4 1923 Eileen M. Richards Q1 1928 Eileen P Richards Q3 1930 Mona C Richards Q3 1934 Gerard Richards Q4 1936 Elizabeth A Richards Q4 1939 Marie J Richards Of course additional children may have been born elsewhere, this may be the children of two or more unions of a Mr Richards to a Miss McCabe, errors happen in the civil records, etc, etc. However likely deaths of an Ernest Richards, (no middle names), in England & Wales includes a 44 year old Ernest in the Middlesbrough District in Q2 1942, (no obvious civil probate). If that is the right individual, and assuming the above are his children, then looks like he only becomes a serious candidate if the OP’s mother was Mona. So at this point I think only the Artillery Officer cadet is a serious candidate for consideration. How the other mans’ medals came into the family possession we shall probably never know – extended family, bought on a whim because of similar name, etc, etc. As we now have very little to go on who the Artillery Officer cadet is, for me the next step has to be with the OP, who quite rightly might not wish to post family information in a public forum. Cheers, Peter Edited 28 February , 2021 by PRC Typo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaySearching Posted 28 February , 2021 Share Posted 28 February , 2021 Peter As can be seen on Ernest's attestation doc He gave his age as 20 and 7 months old on the 11th Dec 1915 (attestation Dec 1915 -called up 17/5/1916 Note he apparently could not write as he has put a cross as (the mark of Ernest Richards) as his signature corresponding 1911 census return for 88 Duncombe Street Middlesbrough hope this assists Ray Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PRC Posted 1 March , 2021 Share Posted 1 March , 2021 Thanks Ray, 8 hours ago, RaySearching said: Note he apparently could not write as he has put a cross as (the mark of Ernest Richards) as his signature If proof was needed that we are looking at two different men surely that has to be it. The Army would be unlikely to consider him officer material for any unit, let alone one as technically complex as the artillery. So if he was 20 years and 7 months when he enlisted on the 11th December 1915, (and assuming that information can be taken at face value), then looking at a birth April/May 1895. The address on the enlistment, as you point out, is identical to the one on the 1911 Census of England & Wales, where there is a 15 year old Ernest in the household, born Grangetown, Yorkshire. As the census was taken on the 2nd April 1911, and again, assuming the information is correct, that gives you a birth between the 3rd April 1895 and the 2nd April 1896. Which in turn leads us back to the Ernest John Richards, (co-incidentally or not, the name of the father on the 1911 Census), whose birth was registered with the Civil Authorities in the Middlesbrough District in the April to June quarter, (Q2), of 1895. Mothers’ maiden name was Gauntlett. The UK BMD site doesn’t list a Civil Parish of Grangetown as being part of the area covered by the Middlesbrough Civil Registration District: https://www.ukbmd.org.uk/reg/districts/middlesbrough.html However a check of the 1901 Census of England & Wales for households in Grangetown, Yorkshire, brought up quite a number, but a random check of 20 households shows they addresses were given as Grangetown, Eston – and the Civil Parish of Eston is definitely in the right Civil Registration District. Ernest is also shown as born Grangetown on the 1901 Census of England & Wales. The 1911 Census information tells us parents Ernest John and Julia have been married 20 years, and their oldest child living with them, Mary Ann, (18), was born Middlesbrough. The marriage of an Ernest John Richards to a Julia Gauntlett was recorded in the Middlesbrough District in the July to September quarter, (Q3), of 1891. Conclusions: 1) The civil records antecedents for the other ranks man is now known – birth, 1901 & 1911 Census entries are consistant and tie in with enlistment. 2) We therefore know nothing about the officer cadet, unless it is his marriage and 1939 Register entry, and therefore potentially that is the point the two sets of records become mixed up on the genealogy side. If the 1st May 1897 birthdate is in fact correct for the Artillery Officer, and he was born in England & Wales, (two big assumptions) and given that you had 42 days after the event to register the birth, then you should be looking at a birth registered in the April to June quarter, (Q2), of 1897. Candidates are:- Ernest Richards…………….Birkenhead District Ernest Richards…………….Nuneaton District (likely death Q3 1897) Ernest George Richards……Cardiff District (likely death Q4 1897) Ernest Victor Richards…….Pancras District Ernest William Richards…..Bridgwater District Ernest William Richards…..Bedminster District (likely death Q3 1897) Going through those who made adulthood, there is a 1946 London Gazette entry for a Captain (Quartermaster) Ernest Victor Richards, (241182), The South Wales Borderers, who was associated with Chorley. https://www.thegazette.co.uk/London/issue/37442/supplement/624/data.pdf Hopefully @GoldenMan will come back and provide some more information so we can assist him further. Cheers, Peter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Michelle Young Posted 2 March , 2021 Admin Share Posted 2 March , 2021 @GoldenManCould the photo be of one of your mothers uncles, a brother in law, or did your grandmother remarry? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now