manxman Posted 22 January , 2004 Posted 22 January , 2004 I was reading a Regimental history where mention was made of a "Chinese barrage", can some one please explain what this is please. thanks
paul guthrie Posted 22 January , 2004 Posted 22 January , 2004 Well a Chinese attack was a diversion, not real, must be the same.
John Milner Posted 22 January , 2004 Posted 22 January , 2004 A barrage would commence in preparation for an infantry attack, then it would cease and the infantry would prepare to attack, as normal, but the infantry attack was a feint to get the Germans to man their parapet, once manned the attacking infantry would take cover in their own trenches, and the artillery would open up again on the, now manned, enemy trenches. John Milner
John Milner Posted 22 January , 2004 Posted 22 January , 2004 Manxman Perhaps, "in those days" the Chinese had a reputation for being sneaky and underhand, and of course, inscruteable. John Milner
Greg Posted 22 January , 2004 Posted 22 January , 2004 I think Ormonde de l'Epee Winter who was RA and later head of Intelligence in Ireland admits it somewhere - he was the devious one- he even managed to get away with killing a 'yob' who threw stones at him whilst putting on the Cam before the war- smashed his head in with a punt pole. A real 'character' if that is not too polite. Not sure about the attribution and I have definitely read a quote somewhere Greg
Clive Harris Posted 23 January , 2004 Posted 23 January , 2004 A chinese barrage is exactly as John puts it, all indications were given to the enemy that a raid is about to take place, a sector of the German line would be targetted by divisional artillery and then after a brief pause (giving the enemy time to "Stand To") the barrage would commence again, it was not uncommon for our own troops to leave only minimal men in the line during these type of operations as a retaliation from German Artillery was almost inevitable. There is a good account of a "Chinese barrage" in Sidney Rogerson's "Twelve Days" that took place near Guedecourt on the noght of the 13/14th November
gem22 Posted 23 January , 2004 Posted 23 January , 2004 General Sir Martin Farndale in History of the Royal Artillery puts it slightly differently. " a Chinese Barrage was a barrage fired in order to mislead the enemy into thinking that an attack was coming in its direction when none was planned." Garth
Geoff Parker Posted 23 January , 2004 Posted 23 January , 2004 Chinese barrage or Chinese attack was an attempt to mislead the enemy into thinking that an attack was going to take place. RE's in France built cardboard figures (similar to those on a military rifle range) mounted as a group horizontally onto a wooden base. By activating a lever or pulley the figures would then pop up vertically. I am sure these were referred to as a Chinese attack. If a group of figures popped up above the parapit you would assume the enemy would open fire on them. Whether the ploy was to get the to disclose any MG positions I don't know. I have never read any accounts of them being used but I certainly have drawings and plans for them in a RE manual printed in the 20's. Geoff
koyli Posted 23 January , 2004 Posted 23 January , 2004 Hi All, The use of dummy figures as mentioned by Geoff, is mentioned in the book "From Rideau to the Rhine and back (6th field Coy CEF), page 50: (The unit was at that time, together with the two Canadian Divisions on the Messines Ridge front) "The 13th(October1915) broke clear and bright with a light breeze from the west. At 2.00 p.m., our filed guns started cutting wire. Dummy figures were manipulated by wires and rifles with fixed bayonets exposed above parapets on the 1st Division front as though an attack were imminent......" "Our demonstation was in support of an inconclusive three-day fight near Hulluch for possesion of the Hohenzollern Redoubt." LF
n cherry Posted 24 January , 2004 Posted 24 January , 2004 The 47th London Division used wooden figures in a 'chinese attack' on 25th September at Loos on 25th September 1915 and it is mentioned in either the 1915 Official History or their own Div History...intended to be a feint/diversion away from the main thrust towards the Double Crassier.
Tim Birch Posted 24 January , 2004 Posted 24 January , 2004 thanks, anyone know why "chinese"? The Chinese certainly had a reputation for craftiness and cunning. My Grandfather who had been in the Great War often came out with the expression "Damned clever these Chinese!" whenever he was confronted by something innovative. Tim
ianw Posted 24 January , 2004 Posted 24 January , 2004 "Chu Chin Chow" was the stage sensation of London from August 1916 through to the end of the War (and beyond, I think). It involves tricking bad guys (based on Ali Baba). Perhaps this could have influenced the Chinese Barrage/Attack terminology.
Tom Morgan Posted 24 January , 2004 Posted 24 January , 2004 I've heard that the word "Chinese" was often used in those days to denote something false, or a version which is not quite right. We don't have many examples of this remaining nowadays, but we still have the game of "Chinese Whispers" in which a player starts off by whispering a phrase to the next player, who whispers it to the next, and so on, everyone passing on what they think they have heard, until it gets to the last person, who then says it out loud and compares it with the original phrase. Perhaps a better example is "Chinese Checkers" - a game invented in the USA in the 1870s. It has nothing to do with China, but it was called Chinese Checkers because it was similar to draughts ("checkers" in the US). Tom
Geoff Parker Posted 26 January , 2004 Posted 26 January , 2004 In case anyone's interested, the following information was taken from "The RE in the European War 1914-18" Chinese Attacks Dummy Silhouette figures were first made to supply a demand from 46th Div in May 1917 for use in a raid. Their purpose being to draw off enemy fire. The original 300 supplied were made of 3ply wood and hand painted by all the talent in the RE park and was completed in 4 days. (the book does not elaborate on how these worked and I assume they made have be individually hand operated as the book goes on to say) The problem of rapid execution was then studied and eventually they were made of stout millboard, stencilled and made in ten different types which covered the various attitudes that might be assumed by a man between lying down and standing upright. The work was carried out by unskilled woman labour and in view of the demand that arose, became a standard factory production. They were used; To draw off a real attack To test an enemy barrage To make they enemy disclose his MG positions and defensive arrangements To make him man his parapets and expose himself to shrapnel. In one Corps attack during 3rd Ypres the Corps Cyclist Bn was specially trained in the use of these figures. The silhouette figures were carried up the night before the attack and placed in positions where they would be seen by the enemy immediately they were raised. The base was fixed to the ground by staples, and a wire run from the head of the figure to another staple immediately in front, this wire being of such length as to allow the figure to be raised just short of perpendicular. As the ground permitted, groups of up to six figures could be operated by one man. The fixing and placing in position of the figures had to be carefully done and by men previously instructed in the work. Examples on July 28th 1917, 3 days prior to the attack by Fifth Army, a practise barrage was carried out along the whole Army front, some 300 figures were placed in position and worked for half an hour along the Corps front. The results obtained were that the enemy was discovered to be holding his front line, and five MG's were identified and located. On this occasion the figures were left standing to show the enemy he had been fooled. On 26th September 280 figures were mounted and work for some twenty minutes during which time they were all smashed and rendered useless by enemy MG and rifle fire. They were of matieral assistance to the attack of one infantry brigade between Langemarck and Hollebeke, as they occupied the attention and drew the fire of the enemy from the direction of the attack. The discription then goes on to describe their use in a raid on the Hulluch front. They were also occasionally planted in no-mans land at night for use at a later date. Here is the plate from the book showing the silhouetes and how the operated.
Ali Hollington Posted 25 March , 2004 Posted 25 March , 2004 Pretty sure Edmund Blunden makes reference ( in Undertones of War) to the use of dummies during an attack. If my memory is correct these are described as much more of an amatuer affair being made of straw and sandbags. The dummies work and are shot to pieces, not extactly encouraging as you wait, knowing your turn to go over the top is coming soon. Regards Ali
Guest Posted 6 May , 2018 Posted 6 May , 2018 Chinese Attack - this is fully described in the War Diary of the 55th AIF Battalion in Order No. 94 dated 13th March 1918. I am currently following the WW1 history of some of my fellows, so far on 27th story and this is the 1st time I have come across this type of attach, even though this is not the fist time I have been in the 55th Batt. Diana. DipFamHis. UTAS
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now