AOK4 Posted 17 November , 2003 Share Posted 17 November , 2003 Hello, while browsing through WW1 newspapers I found a very interesting article in the local newspaper of Kortrijk from 27 September 1914. According to the article it is a translation from the Pall Mall Gazette from London. In it is a story about a successful French gas attack with Turpinite (invented by a man called Turpin). The gas apparently could kill all Germans in a trench without causing any pain. Any views? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roy Evans Posted 17 November , 2003 Share Posted 17 November , 2003 There is a feature on gas attacks on the site firstworldwar.com Apparently the French used Turpinite in August 1914. It was a liquid, the fumes of which caused asphyxiation. Painless? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trenchwalker Posted 17 November , 2003 Share Posted 17 November , 2003 funnily enough the person who decided the british army was for useing gas. his father almost decided to use gas in the crimea war. what he wanted to use was coke and deasel fuel. which created a smog suffercating the turks it was never used. i have always been told the first attack was done by the germans against the russians Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MartinWills Posted 17 November , 2003 Share Posted 17 November , 2003 his father almost decided to use gas in the crimea war. what he wanted to use was coke and deasel fuel. which created a smog suffercating the turks it was never used. I rather doubt this - the Turks were supportive of the British campaign and provided the famous Scutari barracks for Florence Nightingale to use as a Hospital. We were not fighting against them! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris_Baker Posted 17 November , 2003 Share Posted 17 November , 2003 funnily enough the person who decided the british army was for useing gas. his father almost decided to use gas in the crimea war. what he wanted to use was coke and deasel fuel. which created a smog suffercating the turks it was never used. Trench, you've got me this time. I am confused. In the first line, who are you referring to? In the second, something must be wrong as diesel fuel was not invented until more than 40 years after the Crimean war! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trenchwalker Posted 17 November , 2003 Share Posted 17 November , 2003 oh sorry having no knowledge of anything pre boer war. it was the russians in the crimea aint it. anyway i aint got a clue what his name was but will find out tomorrow for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terry_Reeves Posted 17 November , 2003 Share Posted 17 November , 2003 Trenchwalker, I think you may be referring to Lord Thomas Cochrane, a naval officer who later became the 10th Earl of Dundonald. Of scientific mind, he had studied sulphur production whilst stationed in Sicily and noted its effects on vegitation and animal life. He suggested the use of a mixture of sulphur and and coaltar as a weapon of war in 1812 but the idea was never taken up. He resurrected the idea again during the Crimean War, as a means of driving out the Russians from Sevastopol but again it was not adopted. In 1914, his grandson, the 12th Earl, touted the idea around the War Office, and although briefly considered, it was dropped in early 1915. Terry Reeves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trenchwalker Posted 17 November , 2003 Share Posted 17 November , 2003 Hoorah he knows what im talking about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now