JulianB Posted 27 September , 2006 Share Posted 27 September , 2006 I've just received information about a soldier who enlisted in the HAC but seems to have transferred to '685th (H.S.) Emp Co. Lab Co No 2666' Could some kind soul tell me what sort of unit this was. thanks Julian Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eltoro1960 Posted 27 September , 2006 Share Posted 27 September , 2006 The Labour Corps is basically a logistical corps responsible for the fetching and carrying of any material required to keep the Army in the field. They also undertook general labouring for any task they me allocated. The ranks of the Labour Corps contained may men transferred from other units who were not deemed fit enough to do 'Frontline Soldiering' , but strikes me as strange they then had them doing hard manual graft. Here is a 1916 quote The pressure for an ever-increasing supply of labour resulted in 1916 in the reclassification of men who had been medically graded as unfit for active service in the Front Line. These men were drafted into Infantry Labour Battalions. Additionally, following the promulgation of the Military Service Act in March 1916, Conscientious Objectors were inducted into Non-combatant Companies for deployment as general labour in military establishments. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mhifle Posted 27 September , 2006 Share Posted 27 September , 2006 I think it stands for 685th (Home Service) Employment Company, Labour Corps. Mark I've just received information about a soldier who enlisted in the HAC but seems to have transferred to '685th (H.S.) Emp Co. Lab Co No 2666' Could some kind soul tell me what sort of unit this was. thanks Julian Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mhifle Posted 27 September , 2006 Share Posted 27 September , 2006 I think they would have been a home based (UK) farm labouring unit. Mark I think it stands for 685th (Home Service) Employment Company, Labour Corps. Mark Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JulianB Posted 28 September , 2006 Author Share Posted 28 September , 2006 Thank you asll very much. Home service certainly makes sense as the chap does not appear on the MIC. Incidentally his number was 209469, would this be a Lab C number or HAC - into which he had apparently enlisted. He was obviously transferred from them to the LC at some tiome foir an as yet unspecified reason - sickness, infiormity - he was only 18 in 1916 !!? Julian Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now