cahoehler Posted 18 September , 2006 Share Posted 18 September , 2006 . . . . Below are two snippets from the war diary of the Canadian [Corps] Heavy Artillery. . . . . Justin These snippets clearly show 51st Howitzer as part of the S A Heavy Artillery AND having 6" Howizers. I think the War Diary is in error (but I have been wrong before) and I am sure that EssDee will find the appropriate allocations. rflory has already said there is no record of 51 being in SAHA. We now need Borden Battery to pronounce. BTW do C E F battery numbers overlap R G A battery numbers? From Nicholson page 135 From Nicholson page 516 Corps Heavy Artillery 1st Brigade, C.G.A 1st Siege Battery 3rd Siege Battery 7th Siege Battery 9th Siege Battery 2nd Brigade, C.G.A. 1st Heavy Battery 2nd Heavy Battery 2nd Siege Battery 4th Siege Battery 5th Siege Battery 6th Siege Battery 3rd Brigade, C.G.A. 8th Siege Battery 10th Siege Battery 11th Siege Battery 12th Siege Battery 5th Divisional Artillery 13th Brigade, C.F.A. 52nd Field Battery 53rd Field Battery 55th Field Battery 51st Howitzer Battery 14th Brigade, C.F.A. 60th Field Battery 61st Field Battery 66th Field Battery 58th Howitzer Battery 5th Division Ammunition Column 5th Divisional Artillery Motor Transport Detachment 5th Divisional Train Detachment, C.A.S.C. Army Troops (Attached to the British Expeditionary Force) 8th Army Brigade, C.F.A. 24th Field Battery 30th Field Battery 32nd Field Battery 43rd Howitzer Battery 8th Army Brigade Ammunition Column Carl Hoehler Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Graham Stewart Posted 18 September , 2006 Share Posted 18 September , 2006 The Order of Battle of the 5th Canadian Division does infact show a 51st(Howitzer)Bty, while based in England. The Brigade and batteries are listed as;- 5th(Canadian)Division - Division broken up February 1918. XIII(Canadian)Bde,C.F.A. - To Canadian Corps Troops August 1917. 52nd Bty,C.F.A. 53rd Bty,C.F.A. 55th Bty,C.F.A. 51st(Howitzer)Bty - became 51st(D)Bty, and equipped with 6x 4.5in Howitzers 1918. XIV(Canadian)Bde,C.F.A. - To Canadian Corps Troops August 1917. 60th Bty,C.F.A. 61st Bty,C.F.A. 66th Bty,C.F.A. 58th(Howitzer)Bty - became 58th(D)Bty, and equipped with 6x 4.5in Howitzers 1918. XV(Canadian)Bde,C.F.A. Broken up August 1917. The 5th(Canadian)Divisional Artillery went onto to serve as Army Troops, 1st Army and remained with them until 11th November 1918. Graham. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cahoehler Posted 19 September , 2006 Author Share Posted 19 September , 2006 . . . 51st(Howitzer)Bty - became 51st(D)Bty, and equipped with 6x 4.5in Howitzers 1918. . . . Graham Thanks I should have mentioned the problem is with the artillery order of battle at Mount Sorrel in June 1916 and only this morning have I found out that only the 1st, 2nd and 3rd Canadian Divisions were in France then. Carl Hoehler Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
essdee Posted 19 September , 2006 Share Posted 19 September , 2006 Carl I think your the victim of the various sources using the incorrect terms. Nicholson refers to 51st, 71st & 72nd Howitzer batteries when clearly these should read Siege Batteries. It then makes sense with regard to the various Allocation details and does not confuse 51st Siege with the 51st Howitzer battery of the Divisional Field Artillery. Looking at the diary extract Justin posted, I again think its a case of mistaken notation. The SA (44th) Brigade was raised as such and arrive in France shortly after the formation of Heavy Artillery Groups. The various HA Brigades are thereafter refered to as HAGs, so it is odd to see them refered to as the SA Heavy Brigade in June. Also, with regard to Nicholson, the various artillery formations listed suggest to me a three division front with 1 HAG per division, a division in reserve and each of the three being allotted one of the 'spare' 6 " howitzers under divisional control. The 12" hows of 86 Siege are under Corps control. Of course its a bit of an assumption, but it would explain why the list is written in the way it is. Stuart Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cahoehler Posted 20 September , 2006 Author Share Posted 20 September , 2006 . . . . of the various sources using the incorrect terms. . . . . confuse 51st Siege with the 51st Howitzer battery of the Divisional Field Artillery. . . . . I again think its a case of mistaken notation. The SA (44th) Brigade was raised as such and arrived in France shortly after the formation of Heavy Artillery Groups. The various HA Brigades are thereafter refered to as HAGs, so it is odd to see them refered to as the SA Heavy Brigade in June. Stuart Another one for EssDee - thanks a lot. Of course it all now makes sense. Carl Hoehler Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now