mtrpltpara Posted 19 March , 2006 Share Posted 19 March , 2006 Hello, could anyone advise as to which is correct? The chaps MIC gives him as 2 Border R, K in A 28.6.18, while the CWGC states 1st Border Reg, died 18th June 1918, not sure which is is correct. Did the MIC and the CWGC get their information from different sources? I thought the 2nd Batt. was in Italy at this time? perhaps he transferred? The chap was 22049 A/Cpl Thomas W Jeeves, buried Cinq Rues British cemetery, France (E.12) Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CROONAERT Posted 19 March , 2006 Share Posted 19 March , 2006 Hello, could anyone advise as to which is correct? The chaps MIC gives him as 2 Border R, K in A 28.6.18, while the CWGC states 1st Border Reg, died 18th June 1918, not sure which is is correct. Did the MIC and the CWGC get their information from different sources? I thought the 2nd Batt. was in Italy at this time? perhaps he transferred? The chap was 22049 A/Cpl Thomas W Jeeves, buried Cinq Rues British cemetery, France (E.12) Thanks They were, indeed in Italy at this time (Monte Serona?). However, SDGW gives his battalion as 1st Bn and his date of death as 18th June. Dave. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtrpltpara Posted 20 March , 2006 Author Share Posted 20 March , 2006 Many thanks for that Dave, any idea where the MIC would have got the information from that he was 2nd Battalion and KIA 28th? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtrpltpara Posted 22 March , 2006 Author Share Posted 22 March , 2006 This is the chaps details, notice the Battalion is wrong and date of KIA is 10 days out, would this have been a clerical error or are there other records the details were taken from and perhaps the error lies with CWGC? Bill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtrpltpara Posted 22 March , 2006 Author Share Posted 22 March , 2006 This is the chaps details, notice the Battalion is wrong and date of KIA is 10 days out, would this have been a clerical error or are there other records the details were taken from and perhaps the error lies with CWGC? Bill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now