LtColSki USMC0302 Posted 10 October , 2005 Share Posted 10 October , 2005 I think I know what this MIC is telling me but I figured I'd run it past the experts just to be sure I'm not missing something. It looks to me as if the 1914 Star was issued, but the BWM and VM were returned for some reason. If someone can tell from the numbers what that reason was, I would certainly appreciate the help. I have been informed that the code may indicate they were returned for destruction. I also do not see any notes which would indicate that the BWM and VM were re-issued. I'm obviously going to have to get a look at the medal rolls (and if anyone is going to the NA, please drop me a line )but from just the MIC, that's how it appears to me. Am I right in this or am I mis-reading the MIC? Regards, ~Dan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HarryBettsMCDCM Posted 10 October , 2005 Share Posted 10 October , 2005 I I also do not see any notes which would indicate that the BWM and VM were re-issued. I'm obviously going to have to get a look at the medal rolls but from just the MIC, <{POST_SNAPBACK}> You are right,the 1914 Star was issued perhaps a year/18 months before the Pair,The BWM & Victory were returned & the Reference is basically the Records Office Audit Code,it does not give a reason,this could be one of many things,between the issue of the Star & Pair,the Recipient or NoK,may have moved,died,remarried,etc & hence the pair were undeliverable{they were sent out Registered Post so had to be signed for~No Signee~No Medals!},The audit would have ensured the Medals were retained for a period{I think around 2~3 Years},before being returned to the Royal Mint to be "Broken Up" to employ their term[ie Scrapped] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malcolm Posted 10 October , 2005 Share Posted 10 October , 2005 My Great Grandmother returned my Great Uncle's medals as he was kia. The entry is; Rtd (992 - kia - 1923) 8362 adr You can understand it - he was her youngest son. Aye Malcolm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LtColSki USMC0302 Posted 10 October , 2005 Author Share Posted 10 October , 2005 Thanks for that, gentlemen. So would it be a reasonable assumption then that his only surviving medal in the trio would be the 1914 Star? Or would there have possibly been no notation if the medals were subsequently claimed/re-issued? I should think if he had been killed in action or died in the service that it would have been noted on the MIC. Perhaps the roll will help clarify the issue. Cheers, ~Dan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HarryBettsMCDCM Posted 11 October , 2005 Share Posted 11 October , 2005 would it be a reasonable assumption then that his only surviving medal in the trio would be the 1914 Star? Or would there have possibly been no notation if the medals were subsequently claimed/re-issued? I should think if he had been killed in action or died in the service that it would have been noted on the MIC. Perhaps the roll will help clarify the issue. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I would think so,it would be unlikely that any re~issue would go unnoted as the Medal Index Card would have had to have been consulted to verify his Entitlement in the initial stages of an application.The roll may give further details {BWM/Victory} Casualties are usually noted on the MiC; but by no means every time,have you checked your man on the CWGC Casualty site?Commonwealth War Graves Commission Site Click Here!> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LtColSki USMC0302 Posted 11 October , 2005 Author Share Posted 11 October , 2005 I would think so,it would be unlikely that any re~issue would go unnoted as the Medal Index Card would have had to have been consulted to verify his Entitlement in the initial stages of an application.The roll may give further details {BWM/Victory} Casualties are usually noted on the MiC; but by no means every time,have you checked your man on the CWGC Casualty site?Commonwealth War Graves Commission Site Click Here!> <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Thanks. I did indeed check the CWGC site and could find no record of him having died. At least not in the regiment he is listed as serving in on his MIC. So unless he switched units and it went un-noted on the MIC, I can only assume that he survived the war. It is certainly possible that he died soon after the war and never claimed his claps and roses or BWM and VM. Is there any access to post Great War census data available? Cheers, ~Dan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HarryBettsMCDCM Posted 12 October , 2005 Share Posted 12 October , 2005 Is there any access to post Great War census data available? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Not @ present,a few years yet I suspect before it is released Your best bet would be his service papers should they survive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LtColSki USMC0302 Posted 12 October , 2005 Author Share Posted 12 October , 2005 Not @ present,a few years yet I suspect before it is released Your best bet would be his service papers should they survive. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> That will certainly be my next step. I'll let you know how that turns out. Regards, ~Dan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rflory Posted 12 October , 2005 Share Posted 12 October , 2005 Dan: Actually what the MIC says is "Retd (1743 KR)" which means the medals were returned under Paragraph 1743 King's Regulations which states: "Medals which, at the end of 10 years, still remain unclaimed, will be sent to the India Office (if granted for Indian service) or to the deputy director of ordnance stores, Royal Dockyard (Medal Branch), Woolwich (if granted for other service) to be broken up." Regards. Dick Flory Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LtColSki USMC0302 Posted 12 October , 2005 Author Share Posted 12 October , 2005 Dan: Actually what the MIC says is "Retd (1743 KR)" which means the medals were returned under Paragraph 1743 King's Regulations which states: "Medals which, at the end of 10 years, still remain unclaimed, will be sent to the India Office (if granted for Indian service) or to the deputy director of ordnance stores, Royal Dockyard (Medal Branch), Woolwich (if granted for other service) to be broken up." Regards. Dick Flory <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Dick, Thanks for the clarification. So what I should take from this is that the medals were returned to Woolwich (He was not IA) to be "broken up" and are thus non-existant? That would make the Star his only surviving "Trio" award. I'm really hoping his records survived, although I know that odds don't favor it, as I have the sense there is an interesting story here. The man in question was with the 9th Lancers, and as you can see by the MIC, went to F/F in August 1914 in time to have been with the unit during their early mounted actions. Thanks again, to all who chipped in. Cheers, ~Dan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doogal Posted 12 October , 2005 Share Posted 12 October , 2005 {they were sent out Registered Post so had to be signed for~No Signee~No Medals Hi All, I read this thread with interest: In my gt grandfather's service record, there is a note to say no signature had been obtained for the BWM & V medals. It is stamped at a post office. Whilst it doesn't say they were returned, neither does it say they were ever successfully delivered. It has always remained ambiguous to me what happened - ie that they were delivered without signature or returned to the office. (there is no indication as to their initial fate on his mic as with the mic posted here.) would this mean they were never delivered? We know the family recieved the death plaque, as we have the scroll (but not the plaque) regards doogal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now