TwoBob Posted 9 October , 2005 Share Posted 9 October , 2005 You could still enlist in the Army between 1914-18 as a 7 year regular? How many men took this course? I suppose you were assigned to a former 1914 regular battalion as well? This would also suggest that a formation like the Guards Division never contained New Army or conscripted men? Thanks, Bob Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muerrisch Posted 10 October , 2005 Share Posted 10 October , 2005 Yes. Don't know, the figures might be buried in the compendious 'Military Statistics .... ', my informed guess is not very many: there were no obvious advantages, not even pay, because New Army and conscripts were both defined as Regular service but on a short-term contract. Probably: I know of examples in my lot, RWF Probably had to take them as the war progressed: again, little advantage in going for 7 & 5 once the war began. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Reed Posted 10 October , 2005 Share Posted 10 October , 2005 There are also examples in the Royal Sussex Regiment of men enlisting in the regular army (denoted with an L prefix on their number in this regiment) up to almost the end of 1914. It was then seemingly reused again from 1917/18 for men who elected to enlist in the regular army to stay on when the war was over. Impossible to say how many, but I have encountered it quite a few times over the years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now