westkent78 Posted 12 August , 2005 Share Posted 12 August , 2005 Just found the announcement that the N.A. are beginning to digitize these records. Should please all you naval types. For some reason I can't post a link at present but it's announced in the "What's New" page. They indicate that 22% of the Registers 1853-91 are online at present, which probably won't help those with just a Great War interest, but hopefully they'll get to the 1914-18 men within the next year. Looks like you get a 1 page record for the standard 3.50 GBP fee. Matthew Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westkent78 Posted 12 August , 2005 Author Share Posted 12 August , 2005 Here are the links to the digitized ADM 188: http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documen...avy-service.asp And the search engine at: http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documen...y=*&queryType=1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kath Posted 12 August , 2005 Share Posted 12 August , 2005 Thanks, Matthew. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
per ardua per mare per terram Posted 10 September , 2005 Share Posted 10 September , 2005 The big question is are they digitising the copies - again - or working from the originals? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sue Light Posted 14 September , 2005 Share Posted 14 September , 2005 They indicate that 22% of the Registers 1853-91 are online at present, which probably won't help those with just a Great War interest, but hopefully they'll get to the 1914-18 men within the next year. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> In fact it's quite the reverse - most of the records already on line seem to be of seamen who saw service during the Great War. No Stokers yet, but out of seven men I've just searched for, five are there, including three who joined after the outbreak of war, and one who had served twelve years in 1912, and was recalled in July 1914, becomeing a casualty on the 'Good Hope.' With so much complaining normally about the lack of service records online, I think this is great work by the National Archives. Sue Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roy Evans Posted 14 September , 2005 Share Posted 14 September , 2005 Excellent news! I've got a man on the Good Hope also. I'll look him up this evening. Roy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bombadier Posted 14 September , 2005 Share Posted 14 September , 2005 I have just found my paternal grandfather on line. I already have his certificate of service which shows details of ranks, ships, qualifications, medals, physical description, character and ability and the awarding, and deprivation, of good conduct badges from 1916 to 1928. Would I get more than this for my £3.50, for example, his service aws an officer? Nigel the miser Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westkent78 Posted 14 September , 2005 Author Share Posted 14 September , 2005 In fact it's quite the reverse - most of the records already on line seem to be of seamen who saw service during the Great War. No Stokers yet, but out of seven men I've just searched for, five are there, including three who joined after the outbreak of war, and one who had served twelve years in 1912, and was recalled in July 1914, becomeing a casualty on the 'Good Hope.' With so much complaining normally about the lack of service records online, I think this is great work by the National Archives. Sue <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Funny you should mention that Sue, as the record of one of the sailors I was interested in have now come up and I've discovered that he went down with the Majestic, at the grand age of 40. As I'd been concentrating on his service around 1900 I hadn't even considered that he may have served in WW1. A bit more lateral thinking is obviously required in future! Regards, Matthew Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sue Light Posted 14 September , 2005 Share Posted 14 September , 2005 I already have his certificate of service which shows details of ranks, ships, qualifications, medals, physical description, character and ability and the awarding, and deprivation, of good conduct badges from 1916 to 1928. Would I get more than this for my £3.50, for example, his service aws an officer? Nigel the miser <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Nigel Probably safest to keep your hands in your pockets! It sounds as though you've probably got most of it, but if you go to the Documents Online main page, and use the 'Read More' link next to the 'Search' link, it gives examples of what you'll get. What's there now doesn't include officers' papers anyway, so your money is safe! Sue Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sue Light Posted 14 September , 2005 Share Posted 14 September , 2005 (edited) I sense a contradiction there, as you said you found him, and also he was an officer. I'm sure officer's records aren't there [or am I?] Off to check Sue No, of course they're not! Edited 14 September , 2005 by SueL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bombadier Posted 14 September , 2005 Share Posted 14 September , 2005 No contradiction, just my poor explanation. He joined as a Boy 2nd class in 1914 and worked his way up through the Signals Branch until he was appointed Yeoman of Signals in 1928 and achieved Warrant rank. His Certificate of Service stops at that point. From the Navy Lists I have traced him a bit further but the detail from that source is basic. He first appears as Acting Signal Bosun in 1928 and worked his way up slowly from there. I know he came out in the 50s and was not happy because his last rank was Commander, but he only received the pension of a Lt Cdr as he hadn't held the rank long enough. Nigel (not feeling so miserly now!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest geoff501 Posted 19 September , 2005 Share Posted 19 September , 2005 Excellent news! I've got a man on the Good Hope also. I'll look him up this evening. Yes excellent news! I also have a man on the Good Hope and have just got the download. Found 2 out of 4 others also. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kath Posted 29 September , 2005 Share Posted 29 September , 2005 Have I got this right, no RNR men? Kath. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
per ardua per mare per terram Posted 29 September , 2005 Share Posted 29 September , 2005 Have I got this right, no RNR men? Kath. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Yes, you've got it right: RNR men are in a different series of records, not ADM 188. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kath Posted 29 September , 2005 Share Posted 29 September , 2005 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparky53 Posted 29 September , 2005 Share Posted 29 September , 2005 Cool just found husband's Gt Gt Grandfather named SMITH. The dtae of birth & place of birth make it easy to confirm the right man Jane Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now