PhilB Posted 28 May , 2005 Share Posted 28 May , 2005 A recent TV programme showed a line of WW1 soldiers laid out for burial. Most seemed to be without their boots. What, officially, was taken off a body before burial and, possibly more pertinently, what was unofficially removed? I`d be interested to hear from bk and the Belgian diggers as to what is and what isn`t usually on a man`s remains. Phil B Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Reed Posted 28 May , 2005 Share Posted 28 May , 2005 I think you will find that it varies greatly, depending on the circumstances of death and burial. If buried by a burial party with no threat of enemy action, then all the soldier's equipment was removed, along with all possessions etc. The former was increasingly important as salvage became a way to save on producing new war materials. Helmets were normally removed, unless for specific reasons, which make gruesome reading and I will leave it to your imagination. This was certainly the case with the soldiers found at Pont du Jour. Conditions on the battlefield often made all this impossible; graphically uncovered by the Diggers and the team at Zonnebeke, most recently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mat McLachlan Posted 1 June , 2005 Share Posted 1 June , 2005 A slight aside, but this topic brings to mind the rather unsettling photo taken of Germans loading Australian bodies onto a light railway after Fromelles. Most of these men had their boots removed by the Germans - replacements (it said in the caption) for the uncomfortable standard-issue German boots. Nasty... Mat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhilB Posted 1 June , 2005 Author Share Posted 1 June , 2005 Thanks, gents. Would you expect British killed to have their boots removed before a British burial? Perhaps the Belgian diggers can say whether skeletons tend to have boots on? Phil B Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aurel Sercu Posted 1 June , 2005 Share Posted 1 June , 2005 Perhaps the Belgian diggers can say whether skeletons tend to have boots on? Phil B <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Phil, I don't recall whether all still had their boots on (in many cases the remains were only fragmentary), but for many or most : yes. But let's not forget : the vast majority of these men had not been buried (at least not officially), since they were found in no man's land. Probably just dumped in a shell hole or abandonned trench. Aurel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhilB Posted 1 June , 2005 Author Share Posted 1 June , 2005 Phil, I don't recall whether all still had their boots on (in many cases the remains were only fragmentary), but for many or most : yes. But let's not forget : the vast majority of these men had not been buried (at least not officially), since they were found in no man's land. Probably just dumped in a shell hole or abandonned trench. Aurel <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Yes, you`re right, Aurel. Those wouldn`t be "formal" burials. Phil B Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeppoSapone Posted 1 June , 2005 Share Posted 1 June , 2005 The Germans were noted for removing, and wearing, the boots of British dead. Sometimes they took the boots from POWs as well. I think that this was to do with the poor quality of their own boots, due to the British blockade. I believe that Germans were noted for stealing boots in the 1918 Spring Offensive, I have seen a lot of photos of British dead with just their socks on their feet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bernardmcilwaine Posted 1 June , 2005 Share Posted 1 June , 2005 The Germans were noted for removing, and wearing, the boots of British dead. Sometimes they took the boots from POWs as well. I think that this was to do with the poor quality of their own boots, due to the British blockade. I believe that Germans were noted for stealing boots in the 1918 Spring Offensive, I have seen a lot of photos of British dead with just their socks on their feet. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> hiya phil,i can only quote john hallows of the manchesters,he was a SB with the 20th batt,he was on burial detail and he said that if left alone by the germans they usually took off their equipment and helmets,then they would empty their pockets and place the items in a gas mask satchel and then take the mans details and give them to the officer who was always present,then they were put in a prepared grave, boots and all,he did say that this wasnt always the case though,because on many occasions they had been laying out for days or longer,so it was just a matter of getting them underground quickly,bernard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john w. Posted 2 June , 2005 Share Posted 2 June , 2005 Seems like whilst respect was given to the fallen, the circumstances of the action going on around might determine the level of burial received... shell hole or full military funeral John Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bernardmcilwaine Posted 3 June , 2005 Share Posted 3 June , 2005 hiya john,your right,it did depend on the activity in the area,if it was quiet then they could expect some sort of decent burial,but even then it depended on the condition of those being buried,many were in a bad state,so i think it would be just a case of trying to find his ID disc,bernard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhilB Posted 3 June , 2005 Author Share Posted 3 June , 2005 But in a "normal" burial, do you think they`d have left all his uniform on including belt, boots, jacket etc? Phil B Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bernardmcilwaine Posted 3 June , 2005 Share Posted 3 June , 2005 phil,i can only quote john hallows the SB,he said,equipment,helmet etc,uniform and boots stayed on,bernard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhilB Posted 18 June , 2005 Author Share Posted 18 June , 2005 Gents, this is the photo (Captioned "burials on the Somme") that prompted this question. It`s clearly a quietish area and the bodies all appear to have their boots removed. That can`t be coincidence? Phil B Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RichardH Posted 18 June , 2005 Share Posted 18 June , 2005 This is a gruesome photo and the chap at the front of the photo brings to mind what Paul said earlier in the post about removal of helmets etc- its sobering to think what is (or isn't) underneath this helmet here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bernardmcilwaine Posted 19 June , 2005 Share Posted 19 June , 2005 phil,do you think these poor blokes boots were taken by the germans,i ask because some have no socks on,the germans used to take the socks as well,bernard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Strawbridge Posted 19 June , 2005 Share Posted 19 June , 2005 I am a medal man - not a uniform and equipment man. I am assuming that the casualties are wearing British uniform. But the man with the pick axe appears to have a different design helmet to those that I associate with the British. Any comments? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhilB Posted 19 June , 2005 Author Share Posted 19 June , 2005 You gents could be right! It may be Germans burying British dead? Phil B Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
6th Shropshires Posted 19 June , 2005 Share Posted 19 June , 2005 It may be Germans burying British dead This is a German burial party, I used this photo (I.W.M. Q 23688) in my book. Annette Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jayne w Posted 19 June , 2005 Share Posted 19 June , 2005 You gents could be right! It may be Germans burying British dead? Phil B <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I assumed so! Where did you find the photo? I've not seen it before? Jayne W Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhilB Posted 25 June , 2005 Author Share Posted 25 June , 2005 The photo was in 1914-18 The Great War and the Shaping of the 20th Century by Jay Winter & Blaine Baggett. Page 186. Phil B Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Desmond7 Posted 25 June , 2005 Share Posted 25 June , 2005 Annette - are these victims of the March 21 episode? Des Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
6th Shropshires Posted 25 June , 2005 Share Posted 25 June , 2005 The photo dates from April 1918 but I could not find the IWM capshion for this photo. Annette Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Desmond7 Posted 25 June , 2005 Share Posted 25 June , 2005 Cheers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
6th Shropshires Posted 25 June , 2005 Share Posted 25 June , 2005 Hi Des we must be on the same wave length, you must have posted as I was typing. I am not sure now if they are victims of the Somme fighting or Flanders but I used the photo in my book in connection with the end of Somme fight (early April). Annette Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now