Jump to content
Free downloads from TNA ×
The Great War (1914-1918) Forum

Remembered Today:

No.5 Mk.1 Mills Bomb with blank base plug?


Hallibag

Recommended Posts

Earlier today I picked up this deactivated No.5 Mk.1 Mills Bomb. Strangely, its base plug is totally unmarked. Has anyone seen another Mills Bomb before with no markings on its base plug?

IMG_0416.jpeg.15d864a7da600eeed5223c146cad874d.jpegIMG_0420.jpeg.3073e8688248d14c76a661c89fc12ef6.jpegIMG_0417.jpeg.45a45c7d346b8981f5720e72eab437fa.jpegIMG_0418.jpeg.207b6d84193644026ec5b960743e257f.jpegIMG_0421.jpeg.c894d1d9beb9740bb107e7defbdeb532.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is possibly it is a wartime expediency, there was a lot of Australian equipment in late 41 and 42 that was unmarked with dates just to speed up manufacture as aid from the Uk was halted with Dunkirk and the increased campaign close to home in the pacific

i have examples of unmarked steel plugs, marked cast aluminium and unmarked brass in my collection 

 

kind regards

g

Edited by navydoc16
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes there are a few around, I suspect picked off the production line before they could be stamped. Normally the blank plugs are early aluminum type but sometimes the brass No. 23 Mk I can be found blank as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Gunner Bailey said:

Yes there are a few around, I suspect picked off the production line before they could be stamped. Normally the blank plugs are early aluminum type but sometimes the brass No. 23 Mk I can be found blank as well.

Thank you!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It may also be something someone has machined up as they couldn’t find an original for the piece- just a thought 

 

kind regards

g

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, navydoc16 said:

It may also be something someone has machined up as they couldn’t find an original for the piece- just a thought 

 

kind regards

g

Could be. It looks just like the early aluminum baseplugs, though, so if this is something somebody made up at least they did a pretty good job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah it’s just more that the patina- at least on the photos looks different to the piece. They should be cast aluminium rather than machined, this appears to show markings on the center from the chuck from the lathe. 
 

Kind regards

g

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No worries, also have a look at the knurling, yours is a standard hobby knurl. I am not familiar with any plugs having that particular type. Normally very chunky for obvious reasons. 
 

kind regards

g

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My photo.

The heavy knurling plug was probably going to be a Throwing Practice plug, taken before stamping.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, navydoc16 said:

They should be cast aluminium rather than machined

Really?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes should be cast and then faced off on the lathe and turned to make the threads. With the normal markings it’s easy to see they are not machined and stamped but cast and machined. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, navydoc16 said:

Yes should be cast and then faced off on the lathe and turned to make the threads. With the normal markings it’s easy to see they are not machined and stamped but cast and machined. 

William Mills, and the other original 60 or so Mills bomb manufacturers, might have had something to say about that.

Production from aluminium bar was the first method of production, 1ft of bar yielding about six or seven plugs. Al bar was costed at two shillings and sixpence per foot, with a cost per plug of threepence. Brass bar was also used as an alternative from early days.

The base plug shown by the OP is an unstamped original plug.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, 14276265 said:

William Mills, and the other original 60 or so Mills bomb manufacturers, might have had something to say about that.

Production from aluminium bar was the first method of production, 1ft of bar yielding about six or seven plugs. Al bar was costed at two shillings and sixpence per foot, with a cost per plug of threepence. Brass bar was also used as an alternative from early days.

The base plug shown by the OP is an unstamped original plug.

Yes my understanding is that was done away with for war economy very early in the piece.
 

Could very well be wrong though

kind regards

g

Edited by navydoc16
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Hallibag said:

A few additional pics.

IMG_6134.jpeg.e525b47f48aabb24a3468abfee14a4d9.jpegIMG_6135.jpeg.d7f01b369ae33dc4e4f21da71b51b042.jpeg

IMG_6133.jpeg.6b8aa8235492505dab8886bdb08181e3.jpegIMG_6136.jpeg.c45d820bc4fdeeafeeb115604b71fbb0.jpeg

Well well, so the knurling is actually correct and cast, rather than cut (which is what it looks like). 
 

so it is potentially actually an original cast expedient plug with no markings 

kind regards

g

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, navydoc16 said:

Well well, so the knurling is actually correct and cast, rather than cut (which is what it looks like). 
 

so it is potentially actually an original cast expedient plug with no markings 

It an original plug made from bar stock, lathe parting tool marks very evident on both faces, threaded with lathe threading cutter, and the knurling applied by a standard lathe knurling tool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 10/04/2024 at 00:07, Hallibag said:

Thank you Navydoc16 and 14276265 for your replies!

Might wish to post your find on “Mills Base Plugs!!!”  May get some greater assistance on the matter, as opposed to the above 👆 

Kind regards

g
 

Edited by navydoc16
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...