PhilB Posted 30 January Share Posted 30 January (edited) The EU have called for non-gendered language, for example:- “Bureaucrats say 'no man's land' should be substituted with 'unclaimed territory'.” Surely no man’s land is very much claimed territory - by both sides? Or did the phrase predate WW1 or previous conflicts? Edited 30 January by PhilB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allan1892 Posted 30 January Share Posted 30 January 3 hours ago, PhilB said: “Bureaucrats say 'no man's land' should be substituted with 'unclaimed territory'.” You couldn't make it up could you. EU civil servants with nothing better to do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KernelPanic Posted 30 January Share Posted 30 January The phrase 'No Man's Land' has been around for centuries. It had a number of different definitions including 'unclaimed territory'. So a gender-neutral term in that wider context seems reasonable. The term as used in WW1 however, was anything but gender-neutral. As far as I'm aware there were no female combatants in any of the protagonists armies, only men. So an opinion with my pedant's hat on , is that 'No man's Land' would be technically correct when referring to the ground in between opposing front lines. Other opinions may of course differ from mine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now