Marian2 Posted 21 November , 2023 Share Posted 21 November , 2023 According to his casualty card (attached) Ervin David Shaw of No. 48 Sqn., shot down 9 July 1918 s.e. of Grancourt (Grandcourt), was initially buried "'square' 1620/19b" (As needed, see: https://www.rafmuseumstoryvault.org.uk/archive/shaw-e.d ) The burial return (attached) at CWGC for his observer, Tom Walter Smith, indicates that their bodies were found approximately at Map 57d R 16. (As needed, click the "concentration" image at https://www.cwgc.org/find-records/find-war-dead/casualty-details/235389/tom-walter-smith/ ) The general area can be seen here: http://digitalarchive.mcmaster.ca/islandora/object/macrepo%3A69483/-/collection Is it reasonable to interpret the "16 20 / 19 b" as (very) short hand for Map 57d R 16b 20.19, and to assume that the reference is using 5 yard resolution for the last two figures? Or am I trying to fit a square peg in a round hole? Thanks for any light that you can shed on this! ---Marian Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteStarLine Posted 22 November , 2023 Share Posted 22 November , 2023 This is a challenging one Marian! Interpreting incorrectly rendered map references is always subjective, but I can see your logic. Also, you would normally expect the exhumation reference to be more detailed than square R.16 but all 11 sets of remains are shown in the same 1,000 x 1,000 yard area, The original IWGC concentration points don't throw any light either. My personal take is 'plausible' but correlation from another source would be good. If only the GRU had used the trench map sub grid and ordinates as they usually did. Cheers, Bill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDT006 Posted 22 November , 2023 Share Posted 22 November , 2023 (edited) Marian, this is a German map reference: Grandcourt is at squares 1619 and 1620, see below. 57d.R.16 is just SE of those German map squares. These locations also match S.E. of Grandcourt from that "B.M. mission report". Hope this helps, Luc. Edit: Map comes from Trenchmapper: Karte der 2.Armee. Miraumont, Sheet: 68, Scale: 1:25,000, Geheim Trenches, railways, Id: m_003800 Edited 22 November , 2023 by LDT006 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charlie2 Posted 22 November , 2023 Share Posted 22 November , 2023 (edited) On the map posted by LDT006 the grid squares are 1000m x 1000m. The square is subdivided into 25 smaller squares each measuring 200m x 200m, these are further subdivided into 4 squares a, b, c & d each measuring 100m x 100m Charlie Edited 22 November , 2023 by charlie2 My bad maths Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDT006 Posted 22 November , 2023 Share Posted 22 November , 2023 Charlie, thanks, the 1620/19 b map reference should then be at this location which matches with the Burial Return sheet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteStarLine Posted 22 November , 2023 Share Posted 22 November , 2023 Luc and Charlie, thanks so much. I'm not familiar with German map referencing so good to have expertise from both of you. Cheers, Bill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charlie2 Posted 22 November , 2023 Share Posted 22 November , 2023 2 hours ago, LDT006 said: at this location Luc, I don‘t agree with the position you have given on the British map, by my reckoning the centre of 1620/19b, which you have correctly marked, is pretty much on the 120 contour line. Charlie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDT006 Posted 22 November , 2023 Share Posted 22 November , 2023 1 hour ago, charlie2 said: is pretty much on the 120 contour line. Charlie, the 120 line is not exactly the same on both maps compared with other features, so I ignored it but used the end of the road to the left on the cross hairs. Having a second look now this is also different. The location that I marked on the British map is about b.1.4 and it should be b.2.8 ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charlie2 Posted 22 November , 2023 Share Posted 22 November , 2023 I had noticed the differences in the maps as well, which I think is only to be expected. I think b.2.8. Is the best we can get. Charlie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marian2 Posted 22 November , 2023 Author Share Posted 22 November , 2023 Many thanks to all for the helpful replies. Does anyone know what the B. M. Mission is/was? Or the files referred to? There is a similar reference on another casualty card (attached). ---Marian Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charlie2 Posted 22 November , 2023 Share Posted 22 November , 2023 7 minutes ago, Marian2 said: Does anyone know what the B. M. Mission is/was? British Military Mission presumably with the army of occupation Charlie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marian2 Posted 22 November , 2023 Author Share Posted 22 November , 2023 You are probably right. I find references to the British Military Mission in Berlin, and references to their seeking information on P.O.W.s and locating the missing. But the info is scanty, and, so far, I'm having no luck finding their "files." The file numbers don't seem to correspond to TNA file numbers; perhaps they went to the CWGC? ---Marian Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charlie2 Posted 23 November , 2023 Share Posted 23 November , 2023 16 hours ago, Marian2 said: British Military Mission in Berlin, The one in Berlin would make more sense than those in the occupied area. Berlin was the home to one of the Red Cross offices and the Zentral-Nachweise-Bureau of the War Ministry - the office responsible for collating and verifying information on casualties. Charlie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDT006 Posted 23 November , 2023 Share Posted 23 November , 2023 There is some information on "the post-Armistice British Military Mission to Berlin" on this page: https://warrecordsrevealed.com/graves-registration-commission-directorate-of-graves-registration-enquiries-i-w-g-c-record-glossary/#unique-identifier22a Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now