Skipman Posted 13 May , 2023 Share Posted 13 May , 2023 (edited) I can't find the thread now but a number of years ago I posted a diary entry of the 153rd Inf Brigade which showed there were many more officers in the battalions than was normal establishment. Something like double the amount of officers per battalion. I don't think we ever got to the bottom of it. I've found another example in the Canadian 38th Battalion in June 1917. Why so many officers? Battalion strengths 2/6/1917 46 officers 860 other ranks 9/6/1917 44 officers 868 other ranks 16/6/1917 44 officers 1004 other ranks Mike Edited 13 May , 2023 by Skipman typo edited '8th' to '38th' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenbecker Posted 13 May , 2023 Share Posted 13 May , 2023 I am unsure if its the same for your units, but in 1917 the AIF intro the LOB concept Where at lest a third of the Bn was left out of battle, so if they were destroyed, then at lest part would be left to reform the Bn. How they went about that is not explained and veried from unit to unit But your right, AIF officer numbers don't appear to be that high But I've seen that before in the modern Army, when after Duntroon graduates its officers, our unit use to get flooded with young officers to under study those already there This happen for short peroids until the cream settled, then most moved on S.B Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skipman Posted 13 May , 2023 Author Share Posted 13 May , 2023 Thanks Steve. Found this further on. It probably helps explain but am not sure what the explanation is. Mike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now