8055Bell Posted 5 January , 2023 Share Posted 5 January , 2023 James Harter (b 16/04/1899) served at home on HMS Powerful from 14/06 – 08/12/1915. He was refused a SWB after discharge and died 16/03/1921 aged 21. Burial at Hollinwood Cemetery. The son of James Victor Harter of 28 Estate Street, Oldham. No evident connection between service and death. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matlock1418 Posted 5 January , 2023 Share Posted 5 January , 2023 (edited) 1 hour ago, 8055Bell said: No evident connection between service and death. Why discharged? [Source? - I'm guessing potentially from his likely Seaman's record from TNA etc?, which I have not accessed https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/D6940261] Pension records at WFA/Fold3 - as James Victor HARTER, 4112, RN ... His father got a dependant's pension of 5/-pw from 3-4-21 under [the Royal Warrant] Article 21-1c - so the MoP seem to have been satisfied that his death was service-related - so that seems some evidence Do you know the cause of his death? Obviously a Death Certificate would help!!! M Edited 5 January , 2023 by Matlock1418 add TNA link Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
8055Bell Posted 5 January , 2023 Author Share Posted 5 January , 2023 One of the WFA cards indicates discharged but not entirely convinced. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matlock1418 Posted 5 January , 2023 Share Posted 5 January , 2023 (edited) There is a disability pension ledger too https://www.fold3.com/image/643628218 as J N [sic] HARTER, J41327, RN - Marked Man Deceased - but the rear is enlightening as shows: 25/2/21 100% [Degree of disablement], Pension, Conditional [so not finalised] 40/ pw from 12/10/19 to 27/12/21 ATS Decision - obviously he did not live that long. Got to admit I don't exactly know what the ATS Decision remark means - I'm thinking perhaps/feel convinced it's 'Appeals Tribunal Service' - but @ss002d6252 should be able to help me/us out I think. To me it looks like the MoP were satisfied enough. Hazarding a guess ... not having seen his DC ... I might perhaps suspect pulmonary tuberculosis as cause of disablement and likely death [a condition which got a 100% pension rate so as to try and prevent a man trying to go out to work to survive and spreading the disease in the community] - just my hunch at the moment. M Edited 5 January , 2023 by Matlock1418 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
horatio2 Posted 5 January , 2023 Share Posted 5 January , 2023 ADM 188 = Discharged "Shore Invalided" - no further detail - after only 6 months in the Boys' Training Ship at Devonport. Death more than five years after discharge. His father claimed his British War Medal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
horatio2 Posted 5 January , 2023 Share Posted 5 January , 2023 N.B. his RN Official Number was just J.41327. 4112 was his Ship's Book No. in HMS POWERFUL and is not an identifier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matlock1418 Posted 5 January , 2023 Share Posted 5 January , 2023 (edited) 27 minutes ago, horatio2 said: ADM 188 = Discharged "Shore Invalided" - no further detail - after only 6 months in the Boys' Training Ship at Devonport. Death more than five years after discharge. Thanks for that Agreed seems a long time between discharge and death Of course we don't yet know cause of death - however if it was fromTB, as I have just speculated ... MoP guidance for TB was as follows [from a report dated 31-3-18]: Image thanks to @ss002d6252 HS and TB to be considered "at least aggravated by military service" and thus pensionable [in the absence of contrary satisfaction by a MB or MoP advisers]. CWGC criteria for commemoration include aggravated by service, so ... ??? Somebody needs to get his DC to put us out of our misery! M Edited 5 January , 2023 by Matlock1418 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matlock1418 Posted 5 January , 2023 Share Posted 5 January , 2023 (edited) 5 minutes ago, horatio2 said: 4112 was his Ship's Book No. in HMS POWERFUL and is not an identifier. Again your excellent specialist RN knowledge comes to the fore - seems the MoP didn't quite know that when they indexed his father's dependant's pension claim [as they then used 4112 - compared to J41327 for his son's earlier disability pension claim]. M Edited 5 January , 2023 by Matlock1418 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
8055Bell Posted 9 January , 2023 Author Share Posted 9 January , 2023 Horatio, Thanks for the advice. I needed educating. M, The qualifacation for a pension was diffierent criteria to commemoration and changed through the Great War. I accept the logic of what you're suggesting but I don;t think this would work with CWGC. Tim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now