Correct way of showing entitlement to MM

[Medaler]

I have got involved with the restoration of a Roll of Honour in a local church from which the original went missing almost a century ago. It has suddenly dawned on me, however, that I am unsure of the correct form for listing the names and MM entitlement in a format where the surname comes first. Should it be either of the two below or something else?

Smith MM, John Henry

Smith, John Henry MM

Also, to be strictly correct, should it be MM or M.M. ?

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Warmest regards,

Mike

[Raster Scanning]

Smith John Henry. MM. 

This is how I would go

[Medaler]

44 minutes ago, Raster Scanning said:

Smith John Henry. MM. 

This is how I would go

Thanks for that.

[Ivor Anderson]

London Gazette uses 'Surname, M.M.' when listing a bar: https://www.thegazette.co.uk/London/issue/31405/page/7644

However, CWGC uses MM. (internet image)  

Edited 15 October , 2022 by Ivor Anderson
Additional Info

[Medaler]

At least I now know that I am not going nuts and that there are variations to be found in reputable sources. Thanks for that Ivor.

[FlersChampagne]

On 15/10/2022 at 21:28, Ivor Anderson said:

London Gazette uses 'Surname, M.M.' when listing a bar: https://www.thegazette.co.uk/London/issue/31405/page/7644

However, CWGC uses MM. (internet image)  

Either is appropriate

[Medaler]

22 hours ago, FlersChampagne said:

Either is appropriate

Thanks for that.

 

Regards,

Mike