Jump to content
Free downloads from TNA ×
The Great War (1914-1918) Forum

Remembered Today:

40 Coy RGA


eviltaxman

Recommended Posts

I've aquired another SWB to a "Turner" :D but his SWB papers state he was a member of 40 Coy RGA. I've checked TLLT, but there's no definate answer to my question - that I can see anyway.

Can anyone out there let me know if they actually left the British shores after Aug 1914, as his entry on the roll states, enlisted December 1895 & discharged December 1917, aged 43 years & 8 months - KR para 2d, & para 392 (xvi). I initially thought he'd left due to age, but there's several on the list a lot younger and from different companies for the same reason.

I'm assuming 40 Coy were a training battery - given his age and probable experience!

It also states that he never went overseas. Everyone else on the list were members of seige batteries.

Cheers,

Les.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Les,

Generally RGA Companies were coastal defence outfits.

At the start of the war these units were scoured to form the cadre for other new batteries which eventually went overseas.

Those too old or in ill health were left with the original company either on coastal defence or training/depot duties.

In this particular case a war diary exists at the NA which would normally indicate some overseas service.

40 Company RGA

Hope this helps

Roop

Link to comment
Share on other sites

During the Great War 40 Company, RGA (along with 46 Company, RGA and one company of Kent RGA TF) formed the RGA Garrison for the Defended Port of Dover. The personnel of these companies manned the guns that defended the port, consisting of five 9.2 inch, six 6 inch, and 5 - 12 pdr guns. I would guess that most of the personnel were men who were too old, or medically unfit, to serve overseas.

Dick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Roop/Dick

Thanks guys. I was never too sure about the RGA/RFA/RHA etc.... but this info would make sense. His SWB roll states he never went overseas, so it'll be interesting to suss out the Kings Regs on this one.

Thanks again,

Les.

Just checked on TLLT - KR 392 xvi states -- "No longer physically fit for service". More than likely due to his age.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Les wrote:

KR para 2d, & para 392 (xvi)

KR, para 392 xvi = no longer fit for war service. At home: A soldier found medically unfit to re-engage and any man discharged for insanity, irrespective of his length of service, will be dealt with under this heading.

KR, para 2 does not have a subsection "d".

Regards. Dick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A soldier found medically unfit to re-engage and any man discharged for insanity, irrespective of his length of service, will be dealt with under this heading.

I know I've been a bit of a looney over the years... this explains everything :lol:

Les

King of the Flowerpot Men

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...