davidbohl Posted 12 May , 2022 Share Posted 12 May , 2022 You would expect this search would bring up the correct man having filled in surname, name, service no. and regiment CWGC His service number 203014 has been deviously indexed alphanumerically 2030l4 I was almost on verge of the non-comm process, so a gentle bit of advice - If nothing comes back from your search, stare at the digits Dave Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keith_history_buff Posted 12 May , 2022 Share Posted 12 May , 2022 I have come across a fair few instances where the CWGC source document does contain the correct characters for the service number, yet when the digitisation took place, a fault occurred with the optical character recognition getting an incorrect character, and no cross-checking taking place, clearly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acknown Posted 12 May , 2022 Share Posted 12 May , 2022 2 hours ago, davidbohl said: stare at the digits This may change my life. Acknown Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allan1892 Posted 13 May , 2022 Share Posted 13 May , 2022 23 hours ago, davidbohl said: If nothing comes back from your search, stare at the digits 21 hours ago, Acknown said: This may change my life. A second look for three of my relatives will now be taken and as davidbohl says, I will 'stare at the digits'! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dai Bach y Sowldiwr Posted 13 May , 2022 Share Posted 13 May , 2022 On 12/05/2022 at 16:42, Keith_history_buff said: and no cross-checking taking place, clearly. I wouldn't say that. I have vast experience at transcribing AVLs using OCR, and can safely say that fatigue, eye fatigue and brain fatigue can cause errors to be missed time and time again. If an entry 'looks' right, it will slip through despite being checked by eyeball many times. The longer you stare at the digits, the more hidden the errors become, and only fresh eyes and brains can spot them I'm still spotting mistakes in lists I created 3 or 4 years ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davidbohl Posted 29 August , 2022 Author Share Posted 29 August , 2022 On 12/05/2022 at 14:35, davidbohl said: His service number 203014 has been deviously indexed alphanumerically 2030l4 Got this fixed, just 3 months to get it done, but don't be afraid to report indexing errors. "This appears to have been a scanning error, which has now been corrected in our database. The amendment will appear on our website in due course, and search by service number should work for this casualty once it does". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now