Rob Connolly Posted 3 December , 2020 Share Posted 3 December , 2020 I've trawled the forums and, whilst people recommend this book (deservedly so), I cannot find an explanation of a phrase the author uses. He defiantly states that there is no glossary, which I don't really need given what I know about the Royal Artillery and field guns, apart from his use of "The danger angle". It's used when his battery is firing in several different directions in early 1916 in the Vaux Valley. Does it mean guns not being fired in parallel? Or is there a more specific definition? Any illumination gratefully recieved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IPT Posted 4 December , 2020 Share Posted 4 December , 2020 From "Field artillery training. 1914 / General Staff, War Office" They are responsible that their guns are not fired when within the danger angle, i.e., the line of fire of any gun must not make a less angle than 45 degrees with a line joining its muzzle and the muzzle of any other gun. Various mentions; https://www.google.com/search?safe=strict&sxsrf=ALeKk02knAPH1dQfcxSEVe78v8wBPXNu-A%3A1607040244537&ei=9HzJX-qlIPK78gKl3qugDw&q="The+danger+angle"++artillery&oq="The+danger+angle"++artillery&gs_lcp=CgZwc3ktYWIQAzoJCAAQsAMQChAeOgsIABDJAxAWEAoQHjoICCEQFhAdEB46BQghEKABOgcIIRAKEKABUN4TWJV3YP55aAJwAHgAgAGQAYgB7giSAQM3LjSYAQCgAQGqAQdnd3Mtd2l6yAEBwAEB&sclient=psy-ab&ved=0ahUKEwjq76i3g7PtAhXynVwKHSXvCvQQ4dUDCA0&uact=5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob Connolly Posted 4 December , 2020 Author Share Posted 4 December , 2020 Thank you for that! I'm on my lunch at the moment but will have a thorough nosey later on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now