ZIL Posted 11 August , 2020 Share Posted 11 August , 2020 Help sought...does anyone know where I can find a map or document showing the numbered Saps from the British front line particularly those leading to the Sunken Lane area. I believe two Saps were driven...Sap 7 is mentioned in several docs which I believe came out on the left a the bottom end of the lane? Thanks Zil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Open Bolt Posted 11 August , 2020 Share Posted 11 August , 2020 See jay dubaya's work at: Tunnel B (Sap 6 or 1st Avenue) from Q.10.d.1.65 to Q.10.d.45.7. Tunnel C (Sap 7 or Mary Tunnel) from Q.17.a.4.3 to Q.17.a.7.55 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don Regiano Posted 11 August , 2020 Share Posted 11 August , 2020 15 minutes ago, Open Bolt said: Tunnel B (Sap 6 or 1st Avenue) from Q.10.d.1.65 to Q.10.d.45.7. Tunnel C (Sap 7 or Mary Tunnel) from Q.17.a.4.3 to Q.17.a.7.55 and "A" would be the one leading to the Sunken Lane (if that is the one that Zil is interested in)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZIL Posted 11 August , 2020 Author Share Posted 11 August , 2020 Thank you...yes “A’’ is the one I am interested in but the attached is from the 1/2 Monmouthshire’s Pioneers Divisional Order 22/6/16.This also mirrors the handwritten order to Lt Williams.The locations are the same but the reference for Sap 7 on previous post is for the Mary Tunnel C.Interesting!! Zil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Open Bolt Posted 11 August , 2020 Share Posted 11 August , 2020 Without having looked at it, there may be discrepancies between the July and November 1916 preparations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZIL Posted 11 August , 2020 Author Share Posted 11 August , 2020 That’s true...I have concentrated on 1/7 but no matter “A” is the Sap I was interested in which has been identified. it’s still fascinating to see how things change in a short period.Zil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don Regiano Posted 11 August , 2020 Share Posted 11 August , 2020 (edited) There are many threads on the forum about the Sunken Lane, some of which include a discussion {and some photos) of where the Sap joined it - if it is the one used by 1LF on 1 July 1916 that you are interested in. Edited 11 August , 2020 by Don Regiano Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZIL Posted 11 August , 2020 Author Share Posted 11 August , 2020 Thank you, I have looked and found some of what you say is there...all of which is informative and appreciated.Maybe I’m being too demanding in expecting somewhere it’s all on one map or document for 1.7.16 bearing in mind all the units that were involved.I am content that Sap 7 for 1.7.16 has been identified including the ‘proposed’ extension. i am also informed that there were two tunnels dug towards the Sunken Lane.If that were the case I would have expected the 252 tunnellers to complete both being relatively close together but can only find the reference to the one from Sap 7.Am I missing something!!!! Zil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteStarLine Posted 12 August , 2020 Share Posted 12 August , 2020 On 11/08/2020 at 22:33, Don Regiano said: Tunnel B (Sap 6 or 1st Avenue) from Q.10.d.1.65 to Q.10.d.45.7. Tunnel C (Sap 7 or Mary Tunnel) from Q.17.a.4.3 to Q.17.a.7.55 That all lies up pretty nicely with the contemporary map and Jay's war diary entry from the other thread. conversions & georeferencing via tmapper.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TEW Posted 12 August , 2020 Share Posted 12 August , 2020 I've collected up a number of maps taken from various diaries generally for the 29th Division but also 4th. Plus pre- attack aeriels. The divisional boundary was not far north of sap 7 and there were 4th division troops in the northern end of SL. The more diaries one reads the more variation you discover. The length of trench dug by the Monmouths, the time they started and duration of the dig varies. The full contingent in the southern end of SL 1/7/16 also seems to be questionable. TEW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZIL Posted 12 August , 2020 Author Share Posted 12 August , 2020 Thank you again for the input....I agree regarding War Diary content...those that have the detail or operational orders.These orders can be changed in what was a developing and in some ways an unknown...but there had to be a basic plan. i am not trying to achieve the perfect picture, but from the input now have a ‘reasonable ‘ account of the locations. Zil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now