Tony cribb Posted 22 April , 2020 Share Posted 22 April , 2020 Morning All Any idea's of this regimental unit , attached to the KOH in India Cheers in advance Tony C Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven Broomfield Posted 22 April , 2020 Share Posted 22 April , 2020 Norfolk Yeomanry? Cypher looks more like Edward VII than George V. Is there any more of the picture available, and what does KOH stand for? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gareth Davies Posted 22 April , 2020 Share Posted 22 April , 2020 I follow your logic Steven but did it ever exist in that format? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FROGSMILE Posted 22 April , 2020 Share Posted 22 April , 2020 (edited) 10 minutes ago, Gareth Davies said: I follow your logic Steven but did it ever exist in that format? There was a variant for Edward VII but although it's similar it isn't quite the same. I think it is Indian Army, it's significant that it is configured ERI, which relates to Imperator, as in Emperor of India. Edited 22 April , 2020 by FROGSMILE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragoon Posted 22 April , 2020 Share Posted 22 April , 2020 I think you're correct with Indian Army FROGSMILE.. Chris Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FROGSMILE Posted 22 April , 2020 Share Posted 22 April , 2020 (edited) 7 minutes ago, Dragoon said: I think you're correct with Indian Army FROGSMILE.. Chris You've got it Chris, Indian Unattached List. I just found it in Cox's Military Badges. 39 minutes ago, Steven Broomfield said: .....what does KOH stand for? I think he means (3rd) King's Own Hussars, Steven. Edited 22 April , 2020 by FROGSMILE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FROGSMILE Posted 22 April , 2020 Share Posted 22 April , 2020 (edited) 4 hours ago, Tony cribb said: Morning All Any idea's of this regimental unit , attached to the KOH in India Cheers in advance Tony C Tony the 'Indian Unattached List' was for officers waiting to join their British-Indian Army Regiment. They were generally young men who passed out in the top of their class at RMC Sandhurst and thus were eligible for their preference of the Indian Army. However, in order that they gain experience of British Army soldiers, the associated military culture and protocols, they were required to serve a period of attachment, usually 6-months to a year depending upon circumstances, before joining their Indian unit, whereupon they went through another period of probation in order to learn one of the agreed military languages to an acceptable level, but also make sure that they were suitable to command native troops. All of these policies were connected with reforms promulgated after the Indian Mutiny of 1857. Edited 22 April , 2020 by FROGSMILE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony cribb Posted 22 April , 2020 Author Share Posted 22 April , 2020 2 hours ago, FROGSMILE said: Tony the 'Indian Unattached List' was for officers waiting to join their British-Indian Army Regiment. They were generally young men who passed out in the top of their class at RMC Sandhurst and thus were eligible for their preference of the Indian Army. However, in order that they gain experience of British Army soldiers, the associated military culture and protocols, they were required to serve a period of attachment, usually 6-months to a year depending upon circumstances, before joining their Indian unit, whereupon they went through another period of probation in order to learn one of the agreed military languages to an acceptable level, but also make sure that they were suitable to command native troops. All of these policies were connected with reforms promulgated after the Indian Mutiny of 1857. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony cribb Posted 22 April , 2020 Author Share Posted 22 April , 2020 Hi All, Many thanks for everyones input , KOH =3rd Kings Own Hussars Regards Tony C Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FROGSMILE Posted 22 April , 2020 Share Posted 22 April , 2020 (edited) 39 minutes ago, Tony cribb said: Hi All, Many thanks for everyones input , KOH =3rd Kings Own Hussars Regards Tony C Another feature of the unattached list dress is the absence of a collar badge, Tony. Your subject would almost certainly have joined an Indian cavalry regiment subsequently. Sometimes British and Indian regiments developed ‘special relationships’ if they had served together in circumstances of mutual regard on active service. Edited 22 April , 2020 by FROGSMILE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony cribb Posted 23 April , 2020 Author Share Posted 23 April , 2020 12 hours ago, FROGSMILE said: Another feature of the unattached list dress is the absence of a collar badge, Tony. Your subject would almost certainly have joined an Indian cavalry regiment subsequently. Sometimes British and Indian regiments developed ‘special relationships’ if they had served together in circumstances of mutual regard on active service. Frogsmile, Many thanks again, a lot of useful information for my records Tony C Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now