Jump to content
Free downloads from TNA ×
The Great War (1914-1918) Forum

Remembered Today:

Alias of Albert McDonald


thetrenchrat22

Recommended Posts

Hi, 

 

can anybody read the real name of Albert McDonald 

 

Delau ?

FB722FB7-1CAB-4130-8129-4C704927624A.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Albert Delauernai?

Edited by Jools mckenna
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Delaverna?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Jools mckenna said:

Albert Delauernai?

 

Jools 

 

thank you for your reply.  

 

Its a relative of a work colleague, who knows that his relative had enlisted under a different name due to the fact his relative had a foreign sounding name. 

 

His relative enlisted as Albert McDonald and died on the 8th January 1917 with the King’s Liverpool Regiment.  

 

He has found only 1 Soldier with that name, date of death and regiment in Vlamertinghe Military Cemetery 

 

But couldn’t find anything that would prove positive that the Albert McDonald is his relative. 

 

The soldiers effects register shows that Albert did serve under an Alias.  

 

When I spoke to my colleague, the other day, he said the real name to me and it’s about right.  

 

Alan 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The claimant of a dependents pension is listed as Deserna ?

with an address

 

deserna.JPG.0ca2eae266da3845703a1a6bb544d411.JPG

 

 

Source W.F.A  pension docs on ancestry

 

 

Ray

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you all for your replies. 

 

I now believe that the Albert McDonald is my colleagues relative.  

 

His service number on the CWGC website is 305144 which were issued sometime in 1917 and therefore after his death but the number on the Soldier effects and pension records, both show 1557

 

alan 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, thetrenchrat22 said:

Thank you all for your replies. 

 

I now believe that the Albert McDonald is my colleagues relative.  

 

His service number on the CWGC website is 305144 which were issued sometime in 1917 and therefore after his death but the number on the Soldier effects and pension records, both show 1557

 

alan 

This usually happens where a man was missing and therefore technically on the book until he was finally declared dead - if it crossed with the renumbering then he was issued a new service number.


Craig

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1471030324_deserna1.JPG.28f16a2886e3058e14411f9b36200231.JPG

 

Interestingly there is both a McDonald  and a Deserna residing at 32 Dickenson Street  

 

Ray

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ray,  

 

it would seem that McDonald was his mother’s maiden name. 

 

A Margaret McDonald married Alberto Delasierna in Liverpool, in 1892

 

alan 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, DavidOwen said:

He was admitted to No 11 Stationary Hospital Rouen on 16th May 1915 - Hernia  FMP link

 

David, 

 

this is strange as the medal rolls does not show an entitlement for the 1914/15 Star. 

 

Alan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, DavidOwen said:

Indeed, perhaps an entitlement missed?

 

Something else to look at, I don’t have find my past but it will interesting to see the document 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

The Grave Registration Report Form states 1557 Pte 

 

the CWGC website states 305144 Pte 

 

the daily casualty listings states 1557 Pte 

 

SDITGW Lance Corporal 305144 

 

the death certificate states 305144  Lance Corporal 

 

the official notification from the Territorial Force Record Office at Presto states 1557 Lance Corporal 

 

the Memorial Scroll shows Lance Corporal 

 

so is it 

 

1557 Pte 

or 

1557 Lance Corporal 

 

or 

 

305144 Pte 

or 

305144 Lance Corporal 

 

I’m thinking that the official notification is the correct one. 

 

What does everybody think

 

alan 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem with lance corporal often comes from it being an appointment rather than a rank, if the paperwork asked for rank then it would be correct to list private as such rather than lance corporal.


Craig

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...