MaxD Posted 13 June , 2019 Share Posted 13 June , 2019 It is 3137 Isaac W J Clack who is the subject of this and we are told that the document was returned to the next of kin of said I W J Clack. The concentration sheet is clearly in error, the number and initials are corrected on the main record. I would agree that this is a file note and perhaps as you say, a draft for the parents. The record office would most certainly not use map references in something like that, hence the (not wholly accurate) description of his resting place. Max Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now