Jump to content
Free downloads from TNA ×
The Great War (1914-1918) Forum

Remembered Today:

Help identifying regiment of this soldier


tony nixon

Recommended Posts

Looks like a Canadian badge but there quite a few battalions with similar shaped badges.

Any idea who the man might be ?


Craig

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it is the Canadian Machine Gun Battalion. It looks like the pattern of CMGB badge with the crossed machine guns backed by a maple leaf.   Pete.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that it does look like a Canadian Machine Gun Corps soldier.

 

747B7AF7-AF7E-4A36-93D8-05DF4331F2B8.jpeg

DB464928-273D-4D0E-A028-5F76343A9765.jpeg

Edited by FROGSMILE
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow I didn,t expect such a quick response.

The man is from Manchester. Could he have been asigned to a canadian regiment?

Also I wonder why he is not wearing a cap and has a collar badge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, tony nixon said:

Wow I didn,t expect such a quick response.

The man is from Manchester. Could he have been asigned to a canadian regiment?

Also I wonder why he is not wearing a cap and has a collar badge.

 

It is a Canadian pattern jacket (usually exchanged once in France for a British one) and the Canadian units invariably wore a collar badge, whereas it was not generally the British practice to do so (although a very few (relatively) units did). 

 

At the time of WW1 relatively large numbers of British born men served in the Dominion units, often because they had recently emigrated and then war had been declared.  Many enlisted where they were and then were shipped back to Britain as part of Dominion expeditionary forces staging and establishing bases before onward deployment to the seat of the war.

 

His hat (forage cap) is merely out of sight.

Edited by FROGSMILE
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

If you have a name for him you ought to be able to find his Canadian service papers via this link - 

 

http://www.bac-lac.gc.ca/eng/discover/military-heritage/first-world-war/personnel-records/Pages/search.aspx

 

Steve

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi

Thanks Tullybrone I tried the link but he is not listed there.

 

Frogsmile you have really suprised me that was not what i expected. Are you saying that men were enlisted to the CMGC directly in England as well as from recent imigrants?

I will fill in a few details. The man is John Thomas Reynolds born 1885 in Hulme Manchester. He married in 1906 and had children in 1907,1909,1911 and 1913,his next was born in 1919 all in Hulme Manchester. He died in 1938 living in the same house he was living at the time of the 1911 census. It is possible he was in Canada between 1913 and 1914 so I need to search the emigration records next week. On his marriage certificate he gives his occupation as carter and on the 1911 census as engine driver (construction) so i think he had horse and internal combustion engine skills. Would these have been particularly usefull to a machine gun corps.

 

Thanks

Tony nixon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, tony nixon said:

Hi

Thanks Tullybrone I tried the link but he is not listed there.

 

Frogsmile you have really suprised me that was not what i expected. Are you saying that men were enlisted to the CMGC directly in England as well as from recent imigrants?

I will fill in a few details. The man is John Thomas Reynolds born 1885 in Hulme Manchester. He married in 1906 and had children in 1907,1909,1911 and 1913,his next was born in 1919 all in Hulme Manchester. He died in 1938 living in the same house he was living at the time of the 1911 census. It is possible he was in Canada between 1913 and 1914 so I need to search the emigration records next week. On his marriage certificate he gives his occupation as carter and on the 1911 census as engine driver (construction) so i think he had horse and internal combustion engine skills. Would these have been particularly usefull to a machine gun corps.

 

Thanks

Tony nixon

 

As far as I'm aware the Canadian service records are 100% surviving so if you can't find him then it would suggest that either the picture is not him or he used different details to enlist.

 

Craig

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

There are some cases of British citizens enlisting in CEF in England (better rates of pay then in British Army) but most enlisted in Canada. In either case the service records should be available via LAC in Ottawa.

 

You might want to look in the immigration records on Ancestry/FMP for Canadian records. I can see several John Reynolds born 1885 arriving in Canada by sea 1911/12.

 

Steve

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, tony nixon said:

Hi

Thanks Tullybrone I tried the link but he is not listed there.

 

Frogsmile you have really suprised me that was not what i expected. Are you saying that men were enlisted to the CMGC directly in England as well as from recent imigrants?

I will fill in a few details. The man is John Thomas Reynolds born 1885 in Hulme Manchester. He married in 1906 and had children in 1907,1909,1911 and 1913,his next was born in 1919 all in Hulme Manchester. He died in 1938 living in the same house he was living at the time of the 1911 census. It is possible he was in Canada between 1913 and 1914 so I need to search the emigration records next week. On his marriage certificate he gives his occupation as carter and on the 1911 census as engine driver (construction) so i think he had horse and internal combustion engine skills. Would these have been particularly usefull to a machine gun corps.

 

Thanks

Tony nixon

 

Tony, I’m fairly sure that he must have been in Canada at the time of his enlistment.  He could not have joined the Canadian forces directly in Britain unless he had a tie via relatives, or some other strong association, although I imagine that there might have been a few exceptions/evaders of the norm, just as there always is in the fog of war.  Someone can always pull strings, but it would have been unusual.

 

The Machine Gun Corps (MGC) was a new corps formed in 1916 by combining the medium machine gun (MMG) ‘sections’ that existed in each infantry battalion and cavalry regiment and then commencing recruitment directly.  

 

In the static warfare that became entrenched at that time the MMG became the Queen of the battlefield and enabled sectors of the front line to be defended by fewer men with interlocking arcs of fire.  

 

The Dominion forces quickly followed suit and the Canadians, Australians, New Zealanders and South Africans all formed their own MGC in emulation.  

 

There were three elements of the MGC, motorised, infantry and cavalry.  By the wars end it was one of the largest corps in the British Army, even exclusive of the Dominion equivalents.  

 

A man with mechanical skills would have been extremely useful given the fast moving working parts of machine guns.  The MGC were progressive and meritocratic and it even formed a Heavy Branch later in the war that evolved to become the Tank Corps (later the Royal Tank Regiment).  

 

Despite this the MGC as a whole was disbanded in 1922.  It was born of total war and seen by hidebound senior officers with vested interests in the pre-war status quo as unsuitable for peace time soldiering.  The Dominions, too, in most cases disbanded their own MGCs at a similar time. Everyone was exhausted by war and wanted to retrench.  As always there was a strong lobby to preserve the ‘traditional’ forces at the expense of the new.

Edited by FROGSMILE
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tony,

 

He does not appear in the CEF records under this name. Could ha have used an alias?

 

All the best,

 

Gary

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you all for your help. I am going to have to go back to my sources and check that the image is who I think it is.

Thanks again.

Tony Nixon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, tony nixon said:

Thank you all for your help. I am going to have to go back to my sources and check that the image is who I think it is.

Thanks again.

Tony Nixon

 

They look like brother and sister, Tony if that’s any help.  The similarity of their facial features (eyes especially) is striking.

Edited by FROGSMILE
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...