gmac101 Posted 4 November , 2016 Share Posted 4 November , 2016 I've been researching the Soldiers on the Galashiels War Memorial and one of them Pte Peter Young of the Black watch 345524 who died in Isreal in late Dec 1917 was declared married to his wife in March 1918. His wife Agnes Meikle Young nee Barlas arranged for a declaration of marriage by a court. The couple met in Edinburgh when they played in an Orchestra, they put off marriage until he had passed his exams as a Weights and Measures inspector but the war intervened. They had informally exchanged rings and Peter referred in his letters to Agnes as " Mrs Young" and on one of their last meetings they conceived a child born whilst he was on active service. The evidence was sufficient to convince the judge that they were "married" and he granted an order to that effect. She is listed as his wife on the CWGC record. Was this a common way to resolve issues with the normal "flow" of relationships that the war had interrupted? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ss002d6252 Posted 4 November , 2016 Share Posted 4 November , 2016 It's not a common occurrence I've seen but Scotland did used to have several ways that marriages could occur without a formal 'marriage': I'd guess it was "marriage by cohabitation with habit and repute" which required a judge to agree that a marriage existed. Craig Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rolt968 Posted 4 November , 2016 Share Posted 4 November , 2016 (edited) Until the Marriage Scotland Act (1939) there were a number of methods of irregular marriage in Scotland. (Until 1 Jan 1940 as far as I remember the only "regular" method of marriage was the religious ceremony or equivalent.) Most importantly irregular did not mean invalid or illegal. It was sometimes just more difficult to prove. In this case the following are interesting: 1. By declaration in front of two witnesses 2. Contracted by correspondence 3. By cohabitation habit and repute 4. Conditional on consumation I have never actually run across 2 and 4; I think Mrs Young might have had a good case under more than one of the above. Is there anything in the newspapers? Roger M There is indeed 27 March 1918 - Daily Record. I will summarise shortly Edited 4 November , 2016 by rolt968 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rolt968 Posted 4 November , 2016 Share Posted 4 November , 2016 “Declaration of declarator of marriage has been pronounced by Lord Sands in the Court of Session of Agnes Meikle Barlas or Young, 3 Orangefield Place, Greenock, against the late Peter Young sometime in H.M. Expeditionary Force. The couple became engaged to the knowledge of their relatives, and in August 1916 accepted each other as husband and wife. The woman was also known as “Mrs Young”, and the man who was killed in action in January last had signed a declaration to the effect that he was married to the pursuer.” Daily Record - 27 March 1918. Roger M Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rolt968 Posted 4 November , 2016 Share Posted 4 November , 2016 In answer to your original question: I'm not sure how common this was, but the situation was easier to resolve in Scotland where an irregular marriage was legal. Roger M Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmac101 Posted 4 November , 2016 Author Share Posted 4 November , 2016 Thanks everybody. So under Scottish law they were married by their actions and Lord Sands judgement just confirmed it. I knew that irregular marriages were possible in Scotland in the past but didn't realise that the legislation wasn't repealed until 1940. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now