robertb Posted 4 December , 2004 Share Posted 4 December , 2004 Should Lloyd George have denied Haig his demand for 3rd Ypres? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Desmond7 Posted 4 December , 2004 Share Posted 4 December , 2004 OK .. I'm popping my head above the bags for a second. I say NO because the objectives were legitimate and worthwhile in terms of channel coast objectives/big picture. BUT, someone should have had the cojones to stop the bloody mess when it swiftly became apparent that it was a very, very bloody mess. Ping! Ricochet ... bleedin' heck! Was that a sniper? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robbie Posted 4 December , 2004 Share Posted 4 December , 2004 I say NO because the objectives were legitimate and worthwhile in terms of channel coast objectives/big picture. BUT, someone should have had the cojones to stop the bloody mess when it swiftly became apparent that it was a very, very bloody mess. I also say "no". I also thoroughly agree that SOMEONE should have stopped the muddy, bloody mess. Robbie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now