OyiboJohn Posted 10 November , 2014 Share Posted 10 November , 2014 In 'The Story of the 2/4th. Oxfordshire and Buckinghamshire Light Infantry' there are quite a few references to the enemy 'sending salvoes' of 5.9's or 4.2's (one of which ended the war for a great uncle in France). Can anyone advise as to what type of guns these were fired from. I do not think they were mortars as they seem to relate to longer distance shelling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Khaki Posted 10 November , 2014 Share Posted 10 November , 2014 As German field pieces caliber was measured in cm/mm's, the reference would have been used as a comparison to the shell explosions (perhaps) that the author was familiar with, what they were exactly I don't know but I am sure that our 'gunner' members will have an answer for you. khaki Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiegeGunner Posted 10 November , 2014 Share Posted 10 November , 2014 4.2 and 5.9 were approximations, in inches, to enemy field guns whose calibres (if correctly identified) were 10.5cm/105mm and 15cm/150mm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikB Posted 10 November , 2014 Share Posted 10 November , 2014 Five-nines were German 15cm rounds (= approx. 5.9"), and 4.2s were 10,5cm (usually called 4.1s in a Naval contest, but strictly 4.1339"). There were a variety of guns in both calibres - Feldhaubitzen (field howitzers), infanteriegeschuetze (infantry cannon) etc., and I believe occasionally Naval guns (long-barrelled, high velocity, long range) for counterbattery work. There may have been mortars, but amongst British troops the terminology would usually have referred to field and heavier artillery. Regards, MikB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stoppage Drill Posted 10 November , 2014 Share Posted 10 November , 2014 Wasn't the 5.9 nicknamed "Jack Johnson" or "Coalbox" because of the black smoke generated by the shell exploding ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nigelfe Posted 11 November , 2014 Share Posted 11 November , 2014 15cm How was the equivalent of a 6-in How (15.2 cm or 60 lines if you were a Russian)), 10.5cm How equivalent of 4.5 in How (11.4 cm) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OyiboJohn Posted 12 November , 2014 Author Share Posted 12 November , 2014 Thanks Guys. Guess it had be something about calibres but couldn't equate to mm's quoted in German Artillery pieces. Not as heavy as 'Big Berthas' @ 419mm! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now