Tom Morgan Posted 28 June , 2014 Author Share Posted 28 June , 2014 Tom In his service record in the Australian Archives on Page 36 (I think) it is written on his casualty form. Peter Thanks, Peter, that's great. The map reference (allowing for the error) does point to a medical establishment nearby as mentioned in the witness statements. I think that Ginchy AP is the likely burial place. It's a fair assumption that there would have been some burials there. Would Pals agree? Tom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Woodger Posted 28 June , 2014 Share Posted 28 June , 2014 Tom The problem is that his burial seems to have been registered, if it was in a registered cemetery then when it could not be found he should have a memorial stone in whichever cemetery the burials from his original cemetery were concentrated to. If his registered burial, not in a registered cemetery, could not be found then he would be commemorated on Villers memorial. IWGC were pretty good at this so I would lean towards an isolated burial. Do you know if there were other Gunners from the same battery killed at about the same time because their records may also show 60th FA as their place of death and may lead somewhere. Peter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Evans Posted 28 June , 2014 Share Posted 28 June , 2014 (edited) There is a mention of Robert Barr Windlow on this thread I haven't looked at his service record but the supporting documents in post #6 show that he was buried at Ginchy Aid Post and Dunner at FA Cemetery at the elusive Ginchy Wood. Phil Edit: I've looked through Windlow's record and there is nothing other than he died in the care of 60th Field Ambulance. No place of burial given. Edited 28 June , 2014 by Phil Evans Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Woodger Posted 28 June , 2014 Share Posted 28 June , 2014 The red spot in square T21 a on the body density map is named in White Cross Atlas as Bouleaux Wood cemetery and appears to be the only wood near to Ginchy. This may help to confuse the situation a bit more. Peter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Morgan Posted 28 June , 2014 Author Share Posted 28 June , 2014 Pete, I was about to refer to R. B. Windlow, but Phil beat me to it. The reference to Bouleaux Wood cemetery has indeed confused matters! Tom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Woodger Posted 28 June , 2014 Share Posted 28 June , 2014 Tom and Phil Windlow's service record shows that he died of wounds, Shell wound to the head, at the 60th FA. The records are silent as to his place of burial. Peter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Lees Posted 28 June , 2014 Share Posted 28 June , 2014 Tom The problem is that his burial seems to have been registered, if it was in a registered cemetery then when it could not be found he should have a memorial stone in whichever cemetery the burials from his original cemetery were concentrated to. If his registered burial, not in a registered cemetery, could not be found then he would be commemorated on Villers memorial. IWGC were pretty good at this so I would lean towards an isolated burial. I have come across similar circumstances where a man is recorded as having been buried in a formal cemetery but now appears on a memorial to the missing. In my case it was a man whose service record shows that he was buried in the Menin Road South Cemetery, Ypres. He is now commemorated on the Menin Gate and not on a 'known to be buried in this cemetery' headstone in Menin Road South as I would have expected. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Woodger Posted 29 June , 2014 Share Posted 29 June , 2014 Ken I believe that it is the exceptions to the general rules that make this sort of work stimulating. It was the anticipation of such examples as yours that made me "lean" towards the isolated burial. Your exception did come a little quicker than I thought. Did you find any mitigating circumstances for the omission or did you feel that it was a slip under the enormous work load at GR&E. I ask because I came across one man whose burial was reported by a Chaplin but the grave could not be found when the GRU team went to register it. His body was never identified and his name was added to a memorial. Peter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now