RobL Posted 26 February , 2013 Share Posted 26 February , 2013 I've often considered that soldiers wore the 03 pattern leather belt as a waist belt (ie around the trousers), either together with, or instead of, the trouser braces, however after discussions I can't actually find any proof of this or evidence to support this claim. Can anyone show any photos of the 03 belt, or any other belts (such as the thin 1917 webbing belt which I also believed was for the same purpose) worn as a trouser belt, or any other evidence of this? Best regards, Rob Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GRANVILLE Posted 27 February , 2013 Share Posted 27 February , 2013 Hi Rob, I've certainly seen several photos over the years of belts being used as you describe, although I can't post one just like that. You tend to find artillerymen down to shirt sleeves have them on show quite often. I'll try and locate a picture or two. Dave Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GRANVILLE Posted 27 February , 2013 Share Posted 27 February , 2013 Here's a couple I've trawled up off the net. The first is well recognised, the second I've not seen before and I post this one for two reasons. If you look really closely the in the foreground, is wearing the 3" wide webbing waist belt - you can just about make out the distinctive buckle. More curiously; look at the man in the middleground wearing the bow-tie and tweed jacket plus gas-mask?! I can only think this must be some journalist brought into the line for the experience? Can anyone shed any more light on this? Dave PS: I always understood the practice of wearing a belt like this was because the trousers were invariably a loose fit around the waist, and that once the tunic came off, without such a belt being used to keep the trousers tight to the waist, there was a high probability of bits of trench wall etc falling into the trousers resulting in all sorts of problems in trying to get rid of it again etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobL Posted 27 February , 2013 Author Share Posted 27 February , 2013 Thanks Dave - yes the tweed jacketed chap is a reporter, seem to recall he always accompanied the photographer. Was told his name but can't remember Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GRANVILLE Posted 27 February , 2013 Share Posted 27 February , 2013 Makes sense Rob. I can't see the reporter being Philip Gibbs. Concerning the waist the belt, I take it you are aware a webb version was eventually produced for the purpose, I think it's shown on the Karkee Web site - Waist Belt Converted: http://www.karkeeweb...1908_belts.html Dave Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew Upton Posted 27 February , 2013 Share Posted 27 February , 2013 Makes sense Rob. I can't see the reporter being Philip Gibbs. Concerning the waist the belt, I take it you are aware a webb version was eventually produced for the purpose, I think it's shown on the Karkee Web site - Waist Belt Converted: http://www.karkeeweb...1908_belts.html Dave I think you're thinking of the "waist belt, web" - quite a rare bit of kit, until a whole load came out of (supposedly Belgian Army) storage a few years ago, and were available to those interested at Detling for the princely sum of £10 each (got a nice crisp 1917 dated one): http://www.karkeeweb.com/patterns/1903/components/1903_belts_straps.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raster Scanning Posted 7 March , 2013 Share Posted 7 March , 2013 http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k116/rasterscanning/My%20Collection%20of%20Bedfordshire%20pictures/Renhold/WW1/4.jpg Is this what you are after? This is (ctr) Pte Alexander Harlow KIA 12 May 1917, as L/Cpl, 40152 The Queens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobL Posted 7 March , 2013 Author Share Posted 7 March , 2013 Many thanks, useful but not showing the 03's. I'm yet to see conclusive proof of 03 or the later 1917 webbing version worn as belts in WW1 photos. Trying to work out whether this is actually accurate for WW1 on any large scale or a 'reenactorism' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now