niimmm Posted 10 June , 2012 Share Posted 10 June , 2012 Hi guys, Just rediscovered an old tin of mine and inside are eight deactivated 303 rounds. Having examined them I notice they all have the same makings on the bottom KN 14 VII I wonder if anyone here can tell me the meaning of these figures. Thanks a lot SImon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garron Posted 10 June , 2012 Share Posted 10 June , 2012 Hey KN = Kings Norton of Birmingham 14 =1914 VII = the MkVII round, a 174 grain pointed nose, cupro nickel jacketed bullet Gaz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
niimmm Posted 10 June , 2012 Author Share Posted 10 June , 2012 Thanks Gaz , that's brilliant Simon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TonyE Posted 10 June , 2012 Share Posted 10 June , 2012 Or to be more pedantic (as is my wont), KN is Kings Norton Metals Co.Ltd of Kings Norton , Birmingham. KN were considered to make some of the best .303 inch ammunition during WWI and their ammunition was preferred for air service use as it was reliable in both performance and dimensional tolerances. They made much of the experimental air service ammo later in the war (RTS etc.) In total thay made about 583,430,000 rounds of Mark VII during WWI as well as large numbers of tracer, Buckingham incendiary and experimental rounds. Regards TonyE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ogilwy Posted 10 June , 2012 Share Posted 10 June , 2012 Tony, You need to get out more mate! We need to go and drink some serious quantities of alcohol, (however I could guess the subject that the conversation would end up on!!!) Rod Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TonyE Posted 10 June , 2012 Share Posted 10 June , 2012 The trouble is young Rod, that everytime I do go out it is with people who are in the system, (and you know who many of them are) and they all force me to drink copious amounts of red cough medicine whilst talking about bullets etc! Cheers TonyE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shippingsteel Posted 10 June , 2012 Share Posted 10 June , 2012 Or to be more pedantic (as is my wont) ... Surely NOT, that can't be right.! (I think we need to start a very serious discussion [read argument] here, about the insertion or otherwise of a comma in that passage above.!) Cheers, S>S Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now