mullet Posted 31 March , 2012 Share Posted 31 March , 2012 Just had a look at a rimmed cartridge (just the rear section) a pal found near Hill 60. Larger than a .303 and it doesn't look like a Lebel in my limited experience. The head stamps are very corroded, with the exception of the number 14 which lies radially rathe than the rest of the marks, which appear concentric. The base of the cartridge appears to be recessed surrounding the primer, the rim effectively sitting proud of the 'flat' base of the cartridge. Anyone got any ideas as to it's providence, and what other head stamps I might be looking for to confirm origin? I guess that the 14 relates to year of manufacture. Best regards Andy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calibre792x57.y Posted 31 March , 2012 Share Posted 31 March , 2012 Just had a look at a rimmed cartridge (just the rear section) a pal found near Hill 60. Larger than a .303 and it doesn't look like a Lebel in my limited experience. The head stamps are very corroded, with the exception of the number 14 which lies radially rathe than the rest of the marks, which appear concentric. The base of the cartridge appears to be recessed surrounding the primer, the rim effectively sitting proud of the 'flat' base of the cartridge. Anyone got any ideas as to it's providence, and what other head stamps I might be looking for to confirm origin? I guess that the 14 relates to year of manufacture. Best regards Andy Sounds like an 8mm French case, with the radial marking and the description of the primer and raised rim. - SW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4thGordons Posted 31 March , 2012 Share Posted 31 March , 2012 Sounds like an 8mm French case, with the radial marking and the description of the primer and raised rim. - SW +1 That was my immediate reaction too. Chris Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mullet Posted 1 April , 2012 Author Share Posted 1 April , 2012 Thanks chaps... I shall pass it along.Andy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TonyE Posted 1 April , 2012 Share Posted 1 April , 2012 Normal French headstamping practice is for the case type to be at the 12 o'clock position, "ART.D", and the metal supplier and manufacturer at 6 o'clock , both concentric. The year quarter is at 9 o'clock and the last two digits of the year at 3 o'clock, both as you term it, radially. The recess around the primer is so that when in the tubular magazine of the Lebel rifle it holds the tip of the bullet of the round behind it and prevents it from striking the primer. Regards TonyE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikB Posted 1 April , 2012 Share Posted 1 April , 2012 The recess around the primer is so that when in the tubular magazine of the Lebel rifle it holds the tip of the bullet of the round behind it and prevents it from striking the primer. Regards TonyE Thank you Tony, I'd often wondered how they controlled the pointed bullets in a tubular mag. Traditional practice was to use flatnose bullets as in (eg.) American 44-40 and 30-30 lever-action tubular magazine rifles. As far as you know, was the recessed casehead reliable? Seems to me that dirt or damage to the mag could disarrange one or more rounds enough to produce a dangerous condition? I suppose it was reasonably well-protected from damage, but foreign matter must have been a very frequent condition. Regards, MikB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mullet Posted 1 April , 2012 Author Share Posted 1 April , 2012 1333269151[/url]' post='1733551']Normal French headstamping practice is for the case type to be at the 12 o'clock position, "ART.D", and the metal supplier and manufacturer at 6 o'clock , both concentric. The year quarter is at 9 o'clock and the last two digits of the year at 3 o'clock, both as you term it, radially. The recess around the primer is so that when in the tubular magazine of the Lebel rifle it holds the tip of the bullet of the round behind it and prevents it from striking the primer. Regards TonyE Thanks Tony, that makes great sense. Were the bullets of a more blunt point than the 'spitzer' style? Andy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mullet Posted 1 April , 2012 Author Share Posted 1 April , 2012 1333269151[/url]' post='1733551']Normal French headstamping practice is for the case type to be at the 12 o'clock position, "ART.D", and the metal supplier and manufacturer at 6 o'clock , both concentric. The year quarter is at 9 o'clock and the last two digits of the year at 3 o'clock, both as you term it, radially. The recess around the primer is so that when in the tubular magazine of the Lebel rifle it holds the tip of the bullet of the round behind it and prevents it from striking the primer. Regards TonyE Thanks Tony, that makes great sense. Were the bullets of a more blunt point than the 'spitzer' style? Andy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mullet Posted 1 April , 2012 Author Share Posted 1 April , 2012 1333269151[/url]' post='1733551']Normal French headstamping practice is for the case type to be at the 12 o'clock position, "ART.D", and the metal supplier and manufacturer at 6 o'clock , both concentric. The year quarter is at 9 o'clock and the last two digits of the year at 3 o'clock, both as you term it, radially. The recess around the primer is so that when in the tubular magazine of the Lebel rifle it holds the tip of the bullet of the round behind it and prevents it from striking the primer. Regards TonyE Thanks Tony, that makes great sense. Were the bullets of a more blunt point than the 'spitzer' style? Andy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TonyE Posted 1 April , 2012 Share Posted 1 April , 2012 No, the bullets were the normal spitzer type and the system seemed to work well. Of course, the other factor that helped was the taper of the Lebel cartridge case which meant that the natural position of the bullet point was quite low when in a horizontal position. However, when the Lebel rifle was originally introduced in 1886 the ammunition had a normal flat base without the groove and the bullets had a small flat on the nose Regards Tonye Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mullet Posted 1 April , 2012 Author Share Posted 1 April , 2012 Thanks Tony, SW and Chris, for taking the time to reply. Best wishes, Andy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now