high wood Posted 19 June , 2010 Share Posted 19 June , 2010 I would like to know when WO's began to wear commissioned officers' uniform dress. Was it during or after the Great War? In short is this photograph Great War or later? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Staffsyeoman Posted 19 June , 2010 Share Posted 19 June , 2010 I'm not the dates expert, but it's only Warrant Officers Class 1 who are permitted to wear officer standard dress (which he is, with Sam Browne belt) , so the single crown (as opposed to the later Royal Arms) may give dating clues. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pmaasz Posted 19 June , 2010 Share Posted 19 June , 2010 I have absolutely no intention of being disrespectful, but doesn't he look a bit like Captain Darling (?) from Blackadder? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob B Posted 19 June , 2010 Share Posted 19 June , 2010 Interesting a Warrant Officer with no medal ribbons, is he perhaps TA,? Rob Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Graham Stewart Posted 19 June , 2010 Share Posted 19 June , 2010 Grumpy will sort this one out - personally I'll stick my neck out and say c.1915 or earlier. The title RSM and the new Royal Arms badge of rank appeared at this time, whereas prior it was simply 'Sgt Major' with the single crown as in this case. However as always there's a catch as post-1918 it was decreed that WOII's could also wear better quality Service Dress and Sam Brownes, but this rescinded in the early 1920's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muerrisch Posted 19 June , 2010 Share Posted 19 June , 2010 Do you know, I have often read about the officer quality dress for WO I and sometimes II, but never seen any authentic order to that effect. I have always thought that the matter was custom and practice regimentally ordained. I too fancy 1915 or earlier, and the man as a WO I. Yeomanry were, in effect, the cavalry arm of the TF, and a bit elitest. His hat looks a little strange, I wonder if a hat expert [wwe are bound to have one] might vouchsafe a comment? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
high wood Posted 19 June , 2010 Author Share Posted 19 June , 2010 Thank you for your thoughts. I am pleased that he may be circa 1915. The only information that I have is that he served with the Sussex Yeomanry and that the photograph was taken in Eastbourne. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deerhunter Posted 19 June , 2010 Share Posted 19 June , 2010 Do we have a name for the man? Rgds DD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squirrel Posted 19 June , 2010 Share Posted 19 June , 2010 His hat looks a little strange, I wonder if a hat expert [wwe are bound to have one] might vouchsafe a comment? Might this be a cover of some kind on the SD cap? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
high wood Posted 19 June , 2010 Author Share Posted 19 June , 2010 Unfortunately, I don't have a name for the Sussex Yeomanry man. I have trawled through my collection and found another unknown RSM in similar but not identical uniform. As he is wearing a ribbon for the 1914 or 1914/15 star the photograph musy have been taken around late 1917/early 1918 at the earliest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steenie Posted 19 June , 2010 Share Posted 19 June , 2010 I would like to know when WO's began to wear commissioned officers' uniform dress. Was it during or after the Great War? In short is this photograph Great War or later? It is interesting to note that he is wearing an infantry sam browne. He is also carrying a cane instead of a crop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grovetown Posted 20 June , 2010 Share Posted 20 June , 2010 His hat looks a little strange, I wonder if a hat expert [wwe are bound to have one] might vouchsafe a comment? Looks like an Officer-type private purchase Gor Blimey to me. Similar shown below, although this has the neck flap folded under the crown; whereas his seems to go over the top (no pun intended) a la the ORs issue version. Cheers, GT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now