tjphillips Posted 12 March , 2010 Share Posted 12 March , 2010 I hope I've attached 2 photos here. I wondered if anyone could identify them? 2nd photo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tjphillips Posted 12 March , 2010 Author Share Posted 12 March , 2010 And is this one the TA? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter and Ellen Posted 13 March , 2010 Share Posted 13 March , 2010 For the image for the chaps in the "jousting" arrangement. I am not aware of the formal name but the "knight" is holding a Lance from a mounted unit. If you look at the bottom of the lance (behind the "knight") you will see the metal fitting for where it rested into some support arrangement for when the trooper was mounted on his horse. Whilst at the "pointy end" (for Monty Python fans), you will note the reflection from the metal point/blade. It looks strange because the head of the lance is vibrating, perhaps it was wobbled just as the shot was taken. This explains why the top of the wooden shaft of the lance appears to be becomming wider (fatter) just before the metal blade. The knight is seated on a saddle and I would suggest that these chaps were just horsing around. I recognise this item as I have a bamboo-shaft one back at home. Regards, Peter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tjphillips Posted 13 March , 2010 Author Share Posted 13 March , 2010 For the image for the chaps in the "jousting" arrangement. I am not aware of the formal name but the "knight" is holding a Lance from a mounted unit. If you look at the bottom of the lance (behind the "knight") you will see the metal fitting for where it rested into some support arrangement for when the trooper was mounted on his horse. Whilst at the "pointy end" (for Monty Python fans), you will note the reflection from the metal point/blade. It looks strange because the head of the lance is vibrating, perhaps it was wobbled just as the shot was taken. This explains why the top of the wooden shaft of the lance appears to be becomming wider (fatter) just before the metal blade. The knight is seated on a saddle and I would suggest that these chaps were just horsing around. I recognise this item as I have a bamboo-shaft one back at home. Regards, Peter Thanks Peter. You know I'd never noticed it was a lance. Perhaps it ties in with the top photo. The 'knight' was my Great Uncle Joe who was killed as a civilian in WWII when his house was bombed. Thanks again Tania Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barrieduncan Posted 13 March , 2010 Share Posted 13 March , 2010 At least two of the gentleman in the last photograph are wearing collar badges - it may or not be significant but I'm sure the uniform experts will be able to take something from that. Totally out of my depth as far as cavalry/mounted units are concerned. Barrie [edit] had just noted your question at the bottom of that image asking if it was of the TA - I have a very similar photograph of my grandfather in a yeomanry regiment from the early 1920s and when I first saw your photo it reminded me straight away of my grandfather's. I think the collar badges could point to post-war, possibly TA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tjphillips Posted 13 March , 2010 Author Share Posted 13 March , 2010 At least two of the gentleman in the last photograph are wearing collar badges - it may or not be significant but I'm sure the uniform experts will be able to take something from that. Totally out of my depth as far as cavalry/mounted units are concerned. Barrie [edit] had just noted your question at the bottom of that image asking if it was of the TA - I have a very similar photograph of my grandfather in a yeomanry regiment from the early 1920s and when I first saw your photo it reminded me straight away of my grandfather's. I think the collar badges could point to post-war, possibly TA. Thank you again Barrie. Tania Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philip Wilson Posted 13 March , 2010 Share Posted 13 March , 2010 Tania Are there any clues on the reverse of these photos? The men in the first photo are not armed - at a higher resolution the mounted Officer facing the men appears to have his rank on his sleeve - nor is he armed - there is no sword on the saddle. One can but surmise maybe this is a riding lesson back here in the UK? On active service mounted troops would usually be armed. I can see no swords or rifles being carried on horseback. Philip Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tjphillips Posted 13 March , 2010 Author Share Posted 13 March , 2010 Tania Are there any clues on the reverse of these photos? The men in the first photo are not armed - at a higher resolution the mounted Officer facing the men appears to have his rank on his sleeve - nor is he armed - there is no sword on the saddle. One can but surmise maybe this is a riding lesson back here in the UK? On active service mounted troops would usually be armed. I can see no swords or rifles being carried on horseback. Philip Hello Philip The only clue is the photo of men on stairs has a note to say 'can you spot which is me Mum?' or something similar. I found them with all the other photos from my maternal grandmother two of whose brothers fought in the Great War. I just wondered if they had any link or not? My brother told me he thought the bottom photo was of the TA but I haven't a clue about the others, sorry. Tania Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truthergw Posted 13 March , 2010 Share Posted 13 March , 2010 I would say that the top photo is a lesson of some sort. The second, and I am guessing here, is a troop outside the stables. The 3rd picture is, as Peter says, a bit of horseplay. The tents could be a TA summer camp but could just as easily be on active service. I an completely clueless as to Unit ID but I'm sure one of the cavalry experts will pop up before long. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven Broomfield Posted 13 March , 2010 Share Posted 13 March , 2010 Probably won't help too much (pixillation?), but a close up of a cap badge or two might just be helpful. Lower picture possibly post-war (collar dogs on o.r. uniform)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tjphillips Posted 14 March , 2010 Author Share Posted 14 March , 2010 Probably won't help too much (pixillation?), but a close up of a cap badge or two might just be helpful. Lower picture possibly post-war (collar dogs on o.r. uniform)? I've tried some close ups - the pixellation was too bad on one, but the other two might just be useful Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tjphillips Posted 14 March , 2010 Author Share Posted 14 March , 2010 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
high wood Posted 14 March , 2010 Share Posted 14 March , 2010 They look to be from the Royal Corps of Signals formed in 1920 from the Royal Engineers Signal Service. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven Broomfield Posted 14 March , 2010 Share Posted 14 March , 2010 I'd agree with that: so post-GW, but probably pre-1929 when the shoulder titles changed (according to Westlake). And the 'lance' is a line pole! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Staffsyeoman Posted 15 March , 2010 Share Posted 15 March , 2010 Absolutely definitely - the collar badge is the mirror of the 1920-47 cap badge (Mercury - aka 'Jimmy' - in a circlet with 'Royal Corps of Signals' around and a crown above, Jimmy facing inwards to the throat). The title is ROYAL CORPS/OF/SIGNALS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tjphillips Posted 15 March , 2010 Author Share Posted 15 March , 2010 Thank you very much everyone. You don't by any chance do a similar trick with identifying all those distant unknown relatives found on old black and white photos in the bottom of cupboards do you...? Tania Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now