coppertales Posted 4 January , 2010 Share Posted 4 January , 2010 Happy New Year.....I purchased a 1907 bayonet over the weekend. It has " 3 or 9 MAN" stamped on the pommel near the release button. The date of mfg is 1918. I can't make out the month. Is this a unit stamp? I have another with a lined out stamp but I don't recall what it is. I will list it later....thanks...chris3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4thGordons Posted 4 January , 2010 Share Posted 4 January , 2010 Happy New Year.....I purchased a 1907 bayonet over the weekend. It has " 3 or 9 MAN" stamped on the pommel near the release button. The date of mfg is 1918. I can't make out the month. Is this a unit stamp? I have another with a lined out stamp but I don't recall what it is. I will list it later....thanks...chris3 Probably - this (the pommel) is the usual location. MAN would I assume be the Manchester Regiment Chris Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TonyE Posted 4 January , 2010 Share Posted 4 January , 2010 Happy New Year to you all. "MAN" is definitely the Manchester Regiment. A propos nothing in particular, here is a Type 38 Arisaka rifle with an 8th Manchester unit stamp. Regards TonyE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
findabetterole Posted 4 January , 2010 Share Posted 4 January , 2010 Here you are TonyE... Seph Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coppertales Posted 4 January , 2010 Author Share Posted 4 January , 2010 Thanks guys. It is nice to have a bayonet actually traced to a unit. The other bayonet has a number and LL or the other way around. It is an Australian marked bayonet but could have been recycled from the battlefield. I will check for sure when I get home.....chris3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TonyE Posted 4 January , 2010 Share Posted 4 January , 2010 LL is the Liverpool College Officer Training Corps. Regards TonyE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coppertales Posted 5 January , 2010 Author Share Posted 5 January , 2010 I was in error, actually my memory was at fault. The actual mark is 11 RF, mfg 9-15.....chris3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TonyE Posted 5 January , 2010 Share Posted 5 January , 2010 11th Battalion, Royal Fusiliers. Regards TonyE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete_C Posted 5 January , 2010 Share Posted 5 January , 2010 LL is the Liverpool College Officer Training Corps. Regards TonyE Tony, sadly you’re correct – just checked Skennerton’s ‘The Broad Arrow’, and there it is ‘L.L – Liverpool College’. I say ‘sadly’ because I purchased this relic brass marker disc in the 1980’s from the Tea Rooms at Delville Wood Museum – the Scottish lady who ran the shop had several biscuit tins full of buckles and bits, at 50p each I recall – and I’d always imagined the “L.L” to be The King's (Liverpool Regiment) and therefore very close to my heart, but as the good book says, that would be ‘L.l.' Even better I recall a fellow collector many years ago acquired a 1907 bayonet with the same 'LL' markings on the pommel - we'd speculated at the time that it was 'Liverpool Pals' and maybe the '4' on the marker disc represented '4th City, 20th service Battalion, The King's (Liverpool Regiment)' but again, on reflection, sadly, probably not. I suppose anything can happen in wartime but is it likely that a rifle issued to the OTC would find its way to the Somme front line. The Feb 1915 issue date I can work out but can you explain the other numbers please – '1749’ – was that the rifle’s rack number or was it the owner’s number – and also the ‘4’ – I’d always thought 4th Battalion, but again probably not for Liverpool OTC - any ideas? Cheers Manxy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TonyE Posted 6 January , 2010 Share Posted 6 January , 2010 1749 will be the rack number of the rifle. Although that disc format would normally indicate the 4th Battalion, I suppose it could be the 4th Company in the OTC. It is quite possible that rifles were taken back from OTC units in 1915 as they were needed for front line units. They may have been replaced by older CLLEs or even Arisakas. In France the practice of having unit identities on butt discs was stopped in late 1915 as captured rifles gave intelligence to the enemy about the units facing them. Leaving a disc to a home based OTC unit would do no harm. All this is conjecture though. Whilst there was supposed to be a standard format for marking rifles, in practice all sorts of variations appear and many of them seem to have been at the whim of the armourer. Regards TonyE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now