manchester regiment Posted 2 January , 2009 Share Posted 2 January , 2009 pte 21306 john,robert barker 22nd manchesters he was killed in action,on 1st july 1916 hes not listed on the CWGC. will his MIC+SDGW entry,be enough,to get him commemorated by the CWGC. mack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terry Denham Posted 2 January , 2009 Share Posted 2 January , 2009 Mack No. His death certificate will be required. However, he is one of the cases already in hand with the In From The Cold Project and so he will be sorted shortly. He will be commemorated in due course. He was discovered by volunteer, John Hartley. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harribobs Posted 11 January , 2009 Share Posted 11 January , 2009 How did John discover it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John_Hartley Posted 12 January , 2009 Share Posted 12 January , 2009 How did John discover it? I know that you are already fully aware of what the Project is doing - not least from the posts made on your own recent thread here. However, thank you for the opportunity to again bring the Project to the attention of a wider audience. The main task the volunteers are undertaking is a long and often tedious cross-reference of the General Register Office list of overseas army and navy deaths against the records of CWGC. In addition, we have already undertaken this check for Airmen Died in the Great War and the home deaths recorded on Soldiers Died. A full check on the names listed in Officers Died will shortly be completed. Barker's name was one of 13 that I identified on pages 171 - 180 of the GRO list, as possibly not commemorated by CWGC. That was back in February. We are now working through the Hs. Of course, anyone interested in joining us can drop me a PM or email. You'll be made most welcome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonyblackpool Posted 21 January , 2009 Share Posted 21 January , 2009 Barker's name was one of 13 that I identified on pages 171 - 180 of the GRO list, as possibly not commemorated by CWGC. That was back in February. We are now working through the Hs. Of course, anyone interested in joining us can drop me a PM or email. You'll be made most welcome. when you say back in February would i be right in saying 2008, because it was first posted DEC 8th 2006 Group: Old Sweats Posts: 578 Joined: 9-June 06 Member No.: 12,889 this soldier appears to be missing. pte john,robert barker 22nd manchester regt age 25 lived at 11 parlington st,harpurhey,manchester son of mr+mrs e.barker educated at st.edmunds school, monsall. enlisted jan. 1914 killed 1-7-16 his obit appears in the manchester papers and hes listed in SDGW,but he doesnt appear to be on the CWGC,can someone double check for me,many thanks,bernard so give credit were its due . tony Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John_Hartley Posted 21 January , 2009 Share Posted 21 January , 2009 Tony Yes - 2008. And you're right about earlier threads. The Forum search facility shows that this thread is the third time that "manchester regiment" has posted the information. This is the 2006 thread (which predates the forming of the In From The Cold Project by some 12 months) - clickety click. Here's the link to the second posting in which mack said he was going to get the death certificate himself and then, presumably, pass it to Terry to submit to CWGC. Clickety click John Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harribobs Posted 24 January , 2009 Share Posted 24 January , 2009 Barker's name was one of 13 that I identified on pages 171 - 180 of the GRO list, as possibly not commemorated by CWGC. That was back in February. We are now working through the Hs. shame you didn't use the search facility previously seems a bit careless not to search GWF threads for non comms already posted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PPCLI Posted 25 January , 2009 Share Posted 25 January , 2009 Chris, Yes, you're right, it could have been picked up in a forum search, but surely this would be an added layer of work that would have a very, very limited return. Or do you think that there are lots of forum members like 'manchester regiment' who, on identifying a non-comm, don't do anything about it for more than two years? As long as this is an isolated case, I think your suggested added layer of 'quality control' is unnecessary - it would certainly add a huge amount of work to an already laborious project. Best wishes, Stuart Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stiletto_33853 Posted 25 January , 2009 Share Posted 25 January , 2009 Guys, This is all about Private Barker I would have thought, and his apparent non commemoration. So hats off to both Bernard and John for this, now shall we stop the point scoring and hope that he is brought in from the cold. Andy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
auchonvillerssomme Posted 25 January , 2009 Share Posted 25 January , 2009 This discussion appears to be about who discovered this man first.... well if he was discovered in the middle of 2006 then why hasn't evidence been supplied and followed up? Mick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doug Lewis Posted 25 January , 2009 Share Posted 25 January , 2009 Well said Andy Regards Doug Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manchester regiment Posted 25 January , 2009 Author Share Posted 25 January , 2009 This discussion appears to be about who discovered this man first.... well if he was discovered in the middle of 2006 then why hasn't evidence been supplied and followed up? Mick i was waiting till the rest of the service records came on line,and hoped that his record had survived the blitz. i have a family to feed,and cant afford DCs at the expense of my family,i was hoping that a service record would have survived,and use this as proof of death. i am not arsed,who submits pte barkers name,the main thing,is that he gets his rightful place amongst the fallen. as andy says,pte barkers commemoration,is the only important thing. RESULT hes in from the cold mack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John_Hartley Posted 26 January , 2009 Share Posted 26 January , 2009 i am not arsed,who submits pte barkers name,the main thing,is that he gets his rightful place amongst the fallen. Bernard Thanks for that helpful post. I believe that Terry has been able to help in the past with non-comms you've found and I know you're not into point-scoring. Hopefully, the Project will be able to put Barker's name forward in the near future. It looks as though the Ministry of Defence and the General Register Office are not far away from agreeing how the death certificates will be provided for the several hundred cases we have on our list. If in the future, you or others find a possible "in service" non-comm where, for whatever reason, you feel you can't get the death certificate yourself, please feel free to make direct contact with Terry or me. We will put the name on our list for submission, although it would have to take its turn (and, as we have done with other folk, the Project would obviously record you as the "finder"). John Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrisharley9 Posted 26 January , 2009 Share Posted 26 January , 2009 Slighty digressing but I have £50 to spend on DCs for naval cases courtesy of our local RNA Chris Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now