Adrian Roberts Posted 18 March , 2011 Share Posted 18 March , 2011 Adrian Roberts, on 17 March 2011 - 01:05 AM, said:If they were going to use parrots or any other creature for this, wouldn't it have been better to position them some miles to the West of Paris, and not necessarily high up? Erm wouldn't to the East be better? Oops... well, I always wanted to be a pilot, not a navigator! The old 180-degree compass error! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peterhogg Posted 18 March , 2011 Share Posted 18 March , 2011 You're forgetting that parrots can talk. Tom Actually they can mimic the human voice and other sounds but that's not the same as "talking" in the sense of expressing a thought through an appropriate and pertinent word or phrase. My friend has one of these and in his words, "they never seem to shut up and they never seem to die". At any rate, I just don't see how you would know a parrot is warning of approaching enemy planes and not asking for a cracker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CGM Posted 18 March , 2011 Share Posted 18 March , 2011 Trying not to move to far off off topic, parrots use words by association, so they could be taught to use words appropriate to the situation, but only if the situation (i.e. aircraft approaching ) happened often enough for the words to be taught by repetition (They're coming! They're coming! although in French, obviously). My indoor parrot frequently surprises us with phrases we haven't taught him but are appropriate to the situation. These are phrases he never uses out of context but they are all situations which happen frequently and he has picked them up himself. Just to give one example, if I raise my voice to call from one room to another, recently the parrot has started shouting "pardon" back. This is a word he now hears frequently but I hadn't realised this until he drew it to my attention. Time to send my ageing husband for a hearing test. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moonraker Posted 18 March , 2011 Author Share Posted 18 March , 2011 ... it's said that Britain used blind people to detect enemy aircraft because their hearing was more acute than sighted men and women. Moonraker Minor coincidence: there's a small news item in today's Daily Telegraph reporting on research at Montreal University that concluded that loss of sight can improve hearing. Moonraker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
centurion Posted 18 March , 2011 Share Posted 18 March , 2011 Minor coincidence: there's a small news item in today's Daily Telegraph reporting on research at Montreal University that concluded that loss of sight can improve hearing. Moonraker Definitely an igNobel candidate. That's been known for centuries. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiegeGunner Posted 19 March , 2011 Share Posted 19 March , 2011 Does that mean that blind parrots would have been better at detecting German aircraft? I wonder how a deceased parrot would have fared ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete1052 Posted 19 March , 2011 Share Posted 19 March , 2011 During our Civil War the U.S. Army had Parrott Rifles, such as this 20-pounder. However I don't think any were in the Eiffel Tower. Even in the mid-19th century America was challenging the technological and intellectual prowess of Europe. The European presumption of superiority is a given, something Americans have to get used to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
centurion Posted 19 March , 2011 Share Posted 19 March , 2011 I wonder how a deceased parrot would have fared ... Some of the first sound mirrors were polly-gone-al Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nils d Posted 21 March , 2011 Share Posted 21 March , 2011 If they were going to use parrots or any other creature for this, wouldn't it have been better to position them some miles to the West of Paris, and not necessarily high up? a "bon mot" if ever l heard one.This is Monty Python territory isnt it? Mind you parrots can hear sounds beyond the range of the human ear.One parrot could hear the noise of a TV remote control so could repeat it changing stations at will! How long did it take the frustrated owner to figure that one out? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
centurion Posted 21 March , 2011 Share Posted 21 March , 2011 a "bon mot" if ever l heard one.This is Monty Python territory isnt it? Mind you parrots can hear sounds beyond the range of the human ear.One parrot could hear the noise of a TV remote control so could repeat it changing stations at will! How long did it take the frustrated owner to figure that one out? Given that remotes use infra red it must have been a very clever parrot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nils d Posted 21 March , 2011 Share Posted 21 March , 2011 Given that remotes use infra red it must have been a very clever parrot. which brings us back to detecting Gothas.They MUST be clever birds if they can change channels , use infra-red and detect enemy aircraft. The clincher here Centurion is that the parrots gave the warning in French ,something l cant do myself ,so they must be dammed clever birds! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squirrel Posted 21 March , 2011 Share Posted 21 March , 2011 Qui est un joli garçon, alors? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
centurion Posted 22 March , 2011 Share Posted 22 March , 2011 which brings us back to detecting Gothas.They MUST be clever birds if they can change channels , use infra-red and detect enemy aircraft. The clincher here Centurion is that the parrots gave the warning in French ,something l cant do myself ,so they must be dammed clever birds! If, as has been said, the Parrots, were only used in the early years then they must have also been prescient to detect Gothas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martin Bennitt Posted 22 March , 2011 Share Posted 22 March , 2011 if parrots were trained by being made to listen to the sound of aircraft, would they not then have imitated that sound when no planes were around, causing considerable confusion? sounds like a myth to me, but myths often have a grain of truth or explanation somewhere cheers Martin B Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
centurion Posted 22 March , 2011 Share Posted 22 March , 2011 All of this appears to be based on the assumption that the tower was a look out post but from the very begining of the war it was a radio station and intelligence centre. A code system was vital to secure wireless transmission. All the major powers began to develop code systems whilst at the same time listening to each other’s transmissions and attempting to break their codes. Networks of listening stations were established, perhaps the most elaborate being that established by the French under the command of a Commandant Cartier with some very tall masts (the Eiffel Tower being pressed into service to provide one of these). This allowed even relatively small transmitters in Germany to be picked up and their position triangulated and plotted. Even without breaking codes this could provide the Allies with valuable information. France created a special unit, the 8e Régiment de Transmissions, for just this work. Working under Cartier its HQ was the Eiffel Tower. Every operator tapping in Morse signals had their own style or ‘fist’ by which he could be ‘identified’ even when transmitting coded messages (although the French did experiment with a Morse key that used an oil filled relay to smooth out the operator’s own rhythm). If an operator who had been previously identified as being part of the HQ of a particular military unit was detected transmitting from a new location then this would suggest that the unit had also relocated. The volume of signal traffic and any changes in this could reveal a unit held in reserve being brought up to strength and preparing for battle. The collection and analysis of such data is today referred to as ELINT (ELectronic INTelligence). As early as the beginning of 1915 Cartier could give the French High-Command a complete organisation chart of the German armies, corps and cavalry divisions. It was also used for electronic counter measures, for example fooling the German Zeppelin navigators who used the tower's signals as a location (and causing the loss of a number of airships). All of this was for obvious reasons kept secret and not any Tomas, Ricard or Henri would be allowed in or on the tower. One possibility is that, before the days of the suppressor, aircraft engines were particularly noisy in radio terms and this was being used ina number of locations as a means of non directional early warning. Possibly the story of the parrots was introduced to conceal this (just as in WW2 pilots eating carrots was used as a cover for airborne radar). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven Broomfield Posted 22 March , 2011 Share Posted 22 March , 2011 So the parrots were operating Morse Code transmitters? Who's a clever boy, then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peterhogg Posted 22 March , 2011 Share Posted 22 March , 2011 They are an Enigma-tic species. My friend's parrot had no knowledge of this story but offered this. ( I admit it's pretty speculative) Since there were likely more conventional methods of spotting aircraft other than using parrots, he wondered if the origins of this story don't actually involve parrots or perroquets. Perhaps there were human spotters in the Eiffel Tower who attained the nickname of parrots. In French, and noting that French humour is err differently-abled, maybe this is side-splitting stuff? I have no source to back this up, but neither have I found a source for the avian-oriented version either Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven Broomfield Posted 22 March , 2011 Share Posted 22 March , 2011 Maybe the onset of the war had caused hardship for the Parisian troubador community, and the word parrots was actually a mis-hearing of pierrots, a group well-known for the supreme listening skills? I confess I'm sruggling to see where all the Columbines went (the Harlequins having, no doubt, signed up with the 7th Bedfords). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
centurion Posted 22 March , 2011 Share Posted 22 March , 2011 Perhaps there were human spotters in the Eiffel Tower who attained the nickname of parrots. The tower is not where one would put spotters. The limitations of air craft detection at the time meant that spotters were placed as close to the first point at which incoming aircraft could be detected (by sound or eye) so as to give as much warning as possible to one's fighter squadrons to scramble and AA batteries to be on the alert. Putting the spotters in the middle of the target would be, to use some Lancashire technical words "just plane daft" as, parrot or no parrot, by the time incoming aircraft were detected it would be much too late to avoid them bombing. You don't put your sentries in the middle of the camp you post them round the outside, the same applied to aircraft spotters. The tower first became a centre for military wireless technology in 1909 just before it was due to be dismantled. In 1903 Gustave Eiffel had suggested to Captain Gustave Ferrié, who was responsible for investigating possible military applications for wireless transmission that the Tower would provide an admirable base for this and volunteered to provide funding. Captain Ferrié received permission from the Department of Military Engineering to install antennas on the Tower. By 1909 the principle was proven and a semi secret underground military radio telegraphy station was built. The concession for the tower was renewed. By 1913 transatlantic communications were established and also with French naval ships as far as 3,750 miles away. Code breaking was established at the station and in 1914 this detected that General Von Marwitz was temporarily halting his advance at the Marne and this initiated the famous Taxis de la Marne. At the same time the range and power of the station proved crucial in coordinating the French counter attack. As a result the concession for the Tower was once again renewed in perpetuity. It became a victorious icon of the battle. The duties of the Tower in WW1 included: Radio transmission to the Front and to most of the French possessions overseas ELINT monitoring German army wireless communications Detection of transmissions from German agents in France Monitoring of German transmissions from neutral countries Jamming German transmissions Deception and spoofing transmissions Receiving and disseminating reports from aircraft spotters located around France Aircraft detection through the wireless noise generated by their engines One could say that it became the French WW1 equivalent of GCHQ - all sorts of cover stories were generated to conceal these activities (I think the Parrots are probably one of these - its about as sensible as the WW2 ones that RAF night fighter pilots were successful because they ate raw carrots). There seems to be no reliable evidence that it was actually used for aircraft spotting. The only non wireless activity appears to have been the installation of meteorological instruments high up in the structure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peterhogg Posted 23 March , 2011 Share Posted 23 March , 2011 Maybe the onset of the war had caused hardship for the Parisian troubador community, and the word parrots was actually a mis-hearing of pierrots, a group well-known for the supreme listening skills? I confess I'm sruggling to see where all the Columbines went (the Harlequins having, no doubt, signed up with the 7th Bedfords). Sadly, the pierrot contribution to the The Great War remains an unwritten chapter, notwithstanding their innovative camouflage smocks and face-paint. Likewise, their sister regiment, the Paris mimes, known colloquially as Les Freres de Marceau, who, it is said never cried out in pain, even when injured. Sorry, where were we? Spotter parrots in the the Eiffel Tower a daft plan? Sounds made up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4thGordons Posted 23 March , 2011 Share Posted 23 March , 2011 Sadly, the pierrot contribution to the The Great War remains an unwritten chapter, notwithstanding their innovative camouflage smocks and face-paint. Likewise, their sister regiment, the Paris mimes, known colloquially as Les Freres de Marceau, who, it is said never cried out in pain, even when injured. Sorry, where were we? Spotter parrots in the the Eiffel Tower a daft plan? Sounds made up. Oh no it's not unwritten! (well at least not unpictured!) These are members of "THE BALMORALS" a pierrot troupe who regularly entertained the 51st HD. Ask mod. Kate Wills. Chris Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
centurion Posted 23 March , 2011 Share Posted 23 March , 2011 . Likewise, their sister regiment, the Paris mimes, known colloquially as Les Freres de Marceau, who, it is said never cried out in pain, even when injured. I'm at one with the Patrician of Ankh Morpork who had all mime artists hung upside down in the scorpion pit (with a sign also upside down that said "Learn the Words") Any way isn't it Trappists who damage their fingers screaming for assistance? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truthergw Posted 23 March , 2011 Share Posted 23 March , 2011 Co-incidentally, last night on a repeat of QI, The inimitable Sandy Hockspit repeated the information about parrots on the Eiffel Tower. I take that to be incontrovertible proof that it is sheer balderdash and poppycock. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nils d Posted 23 March , 2011 Share Posted 23 March , 2011 The tower is not where one would put spotters. The limitations of air craft detection at the time meant that spotters were placed as close to the first point at which incoming aircraft could be detected (by sound or eye) so as to give as much warning as possible to one's fighter squadrons to scramble and AA batteries to be on the alert. Putting the spotters in the middle of the target would be, to use some Lancashire technical words "just plane daft" as, parrot or no parrot, by the time incoming aircraft were detected it would be much too late to avoid them bombing. You don't put your sentries in the middle of the camp you post them round the outside, the same applied to aircraft spotters. The tower first became a centre for military wireless technology in 1909 just before it was due to be dismantled. In 1903 Gustave Eiffel had suggested to Captain Gustave Ferrié, who was responsible for investigating possible military applications for wireless transmission that the Tower would provide an admirable base for this and volunteered to provide funding. Captain Ferrié received permission from the Department of Military Engineering to install antennas on the Tower. By 1909 the principle was proven and a semi secret underground military radio telegraphy station was built. The concession for the tower was renewed. By 1913 transatlantic communications were established and also with French naval ships as far as 3,750 miles away. Code breaking was established at the station and in 1914 this detected that General Von Marwitz was temporarily halting his advance at the Marne and this initiated the famous Taxis de la Marne. At the same time the range and power of the station proved crucial in coordinating the French counter attack. As a result the concession for the Tower was once again renewed in perpetuity. It became a victorious icon of the battle. The duties of the Tower in WW1 included: Radio transmission to the Front and to most of the French possessions overseas ELINT monitoring German army wireless communications Detection of transmissions from German agents in France Monitoring of German transmissions from neutral countries Jamming German transmissions Deception and spoofing transmissions Receiving and disseminating reports from aircraft spotters located around France Aircraft detection through the wireless noise generated by their engines One could say that it became the French WW1 equivalent of GCHQ - all sorts of cover stories were generated to conceal these activities (I think the Parrots are probably one of these - its about as sensible as the WW2 ones that RAF night fighter pilots were successful because they ate raw carrots). There seems to be no reliable evidence that it was actually used for aircraft spotting. The only non wireless activity appears to have been the installation of meteorological instruments high up in the structure. Listern carefully l will squark zis only once.......... if all this secret work was going on in the tower you wouldnt have parrots there as well, they might talk..... sacre blue as they say [or even sacre norwigan blue] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now