nicko576 Posted 11 January , 2008 Share Posted 11 January , 2008 Could anyone help, I have a soldier who died on the 21/09/1915, as i cannot find any major battles involving the Manchesters around this time, would i be right in suggesting he died as a result of shellfire, sniper fire or illness. any help would be greatly appreciated. Nick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michaeldr Posted 11 January , 2008 Share Posted 11 January , 2008 Nick, They were in the firing line 14th to 24th (per Westlake's 'British Regiments at Gallipoli') His death could have been caused by any of the reasons which you suggest There was even a Turkish Mine exploded on the 21st Sept - one of six in September per Steve Chambers' book 'Gully Ravine' - so there was plenty going on even without a major battle regards Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John_Hartley Posted 11 January , 2008 Share Posted 11 January , 2008 would i be right in suggesting he died as a result of shellfire, sniper fire or illness. No. Michael puts his finger on it. The Battalion's war diary records "1 missing (entombed thro' mine explosion)" I assume he's 2591, Pte John William Dean (born Pemberton; enlisted Wigan) - the only man from the Bn. recorded as dying that day? John Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nicko576 Posted 12 January , 2008 Author Share Posted 12 January , 2008 Thanks Michael and John. That is the man, i am looking for. until i read your replies, i was not aware of the use of mines in Gallipoli. once again thanks so much. Nick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John_Hartley Posted 12 January , 2008 Share Posted 12 January , 2008 Nick Yes - mining was very common on both sides during the closing months of the campaign John Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nicko576 Posted 12 January , 2008 Author Share Posted 12 January , 2008 Thanks John my next question was going to be , did the british use mining Nick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michaeldr Posted 13 January , 2008 Share Posted 13 January , 2008 There was even an element of 'Tit-for-tat' in the mining by the two sides The Turks exploded their six September mines on the 3rd, 15th, 18th, 21st, 22nd and 29th while the British replied, detonating their mines on the 14th, 19th and 22nd As well as Steve Chambers' book already mentioned the subject of mining on Gallipoli at this time is well covered in the first hand account by Joseph Murray recently republished as 'Gallipoli 1915' by Cerberus in their Fortunes of War series regards Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nicko576 Posted 13 January , 2008 Author Share Posted 13 January , 2008 Michael I will try my library for that book. I take it the mines were not as destructive as the ones on the western front. Nick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michaeldr Posted 14 January , 2008 Share Posted 14 January , 2008 Sorry Nick, but I have to pass on that one You need John or someone with similar WF knowledge to comment on that best regards Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John_Hartley Posted 14 January , 2008 Share Posted 14 January , 2008 Nick I'm certainly no expert but my sense is that the Gallipoli mining was much smaller scale. The mines exploded at, say, Messines in 1917 had taken many months to dig by large scale tunnelling operations. Mining is only really mentioned around the autumn at Gallipoli - there simply can't have been the time or resources (or helpful geology) to do more. I think, also, that when one reads of the Messines attack you hear of many German casualties from a single blast. At Gallipoli, we lose the odd ones and twos in a battalion. It would be very interesting to see if 1/5th Mancs had any particular involvement comprised as they were substantially of Wigan miners. John Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nicko576 Posted 14 January , 2008 Author Share Posted 14 January , 2008 Thanks John I was wondering that myself, was there a tunneling company, or did the 1/5, dig their own. Pte Dean the man in question was indeed a miner. Nick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MartinWills Posted 14 January , 2008 Share Posted 14 January , 2008 Mining at Gallipoli was on a far small scale than the major explosions on the Western Front. That said it was, in places, a very intense business causing much disruption. On the Anzac front you get a fair idea of the activities from " The Gallipoli Diary of Sergeant Lawrence of the Australian Engineers, 1st A.I.F" - the diary of an Aussie sapper. The extent of tunnelling in a specific location is also covered in Peter Stanley's book "Quinn's Post" Tunnelling is most likely to have been performed by ordinary nfantry units or sapper (engineers) units. There were no tunnelling companies at Gallipoli. It would obviously make sense to use units comprising former miners ..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John_Hartley Posted 14 January , 2008 Share Posted 14 January , 2008 It would obviously make sense to use units comprising former miners ..... It would. But I've just flicked through the diary and there's absolutely no indication that 5th Mancs did any tunnelling. The diary describes what I would call "normal trench routine" and the only day when assistance is specifically given to the Royal Engineers it is to help with building winter quarters. Odd. Most odd. I thought they would have been a cert. to be involved but they weren't. John Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nicko576 Posted 15 January , 2008 Author Share Posted 15 January , 2008 Thanks everyone An interesting tale cheers Nick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eceabat Posted 19 January , 2008 Share Posted 19 January , 2008 Hi all, just thought I'd put in my two bobs worth. When the Allies evacuated the Anzac position, they filled a number of tunnels with explosives, to be detonated only if the Turks discovered the final stage of the evacuation in progress and launched an attack. Two mines, located at the Nek, was set off, according to Bean by a somewhat over zealous young officer, killing some 80 Turkish soldiers. There is a good account of this, from the Turkish side, in a new book brought out by Haluk Oral, including reference to two soldiers buried by the first explosion being blown into the air by the second blast. The mines were definitely on a smaller scale than on the Western Front. The five or so mines prepared in the Johnstone's Jolly sector only amounted to about six tonnes of gun cotton, considered very large by Gallipoli standards. Turkish national park authorities were recently prompted to drop plans to dig up a large part of the area in order to "re-create" the old Turkish front line due to the danger of buried explosives, something they knew nothing about till a few hints were dropped. An interesting side light to history came in the 1950s, when two locals from the nearby village of Kocadere, went rummaging in a tunnel nearer the Quinns Post sector of the old front line. They apparently were carrying an old gas lantern and went on to prove (very fatally) how dangerous an old battlefield can be for the unwary or the blindingly stupid. Cheers Bill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krithia Posted 19 January , 2008 Share Posted 19 January , 2008 Tunnelling is most likely to have been performed by ordinary nfantry units or sapper (engineers) units. There were no tunnelling companies at Gallipoli. Actually there were two mining companies at Gallipoli on the Helles front, VIIIth Corps Mining Company that was made up of former miners (the Joe Murray account in his book Gallipoli, As I Saw It is brilliant). In December 1915, 254th Mining Company RE, merged with this company, but arrived a little too late to make much of an impact. 254 then moved to the Western Front. Hi Bill, is Haluk Oral's book (Gallipoli Through Turkish Eyes?) available now? It sounds like a must have book. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now