Glenn Posted 12 November , 2007 Share Posted 12 November , 2007 I visited the Noel Chevasse cemetery over the weekend with some recruits from ATR Pirbright and noticed a head stone with a Royal Artillery cap badge with the rank of Corporal. Surely this would be an error as the rank of Corporal does not exist in the Royal Artillery and this should be Bombardier. I didn’t make a note of the name though I will make a note when I again visit in 2 weeks time. Any obvious reasons why? Glenn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Morgan Posted 12 November , 2007 Share Posted 12 November , 2007 Glenn, there were corporals and bombardiers in the Royal Artillery until 1920. A Corporal had two chevrons and a Bombardier had one. Tom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glenn Posted 13 November , 2007 Author Share Posted 13 November , 2007 Thank you, very helpful. Glenn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muerrisch Posted 13 November , 2007 Share Posted 13 November , 2007 and no way to distinguish between bombardier and acting- or lance-bombardier, of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Will O'Brien Posted 13 November , 2007 Share Posted 13 November , 2007 and no way to distinguish between bombardier and acting- or lance-bombardier, of course. Which brings a question to my mind...........How would you address a soldier of the Royal Artillery who had only 1 chevron, if he was personally not known to you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muerrisch Posted 14 November , 2007 Share Posted 14 November , 2007 as 'bombardier', also 'corporal' for all sorts of corporal including 'lance', and 'sergeant' includes 'lance sergeant', and indeed 'colonel' includes 'lt. col', and 'commander' includes 'lt. commander'. This is strictly for verbal communication: on an envelope the full title is used. And the above does not include the nuances of junior/ senior discourse, eg a soldier would refer to the Lt Col as Col, but [if he ever spoke to him] verbally he would be sir. Oh, and Colour Sergeants of foot guards are 'Sir!', known as pay sergeants in the Grenadier Guards and so on and so on ......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Will O'Brien Posted 14 November , 2007 Share Posted 14 November , 2007 as 'bombardier', also 'corporal' for all sorts of corporal including 'lance', and 'sergeant' includes 'lance sergeant', and indeed 'colonel' includes 'lt. col', and 'commander' includes 'lt. commander'. This is strictly for verbal communication: on an envelope the full title is used. And the above does not include the nuances of junior/ senior discourse, eg a soldier would refer to the Lt Col as Col, but [if he ever spoke to him] verbally he would be sir. Oh, and Colour Sergeants of foot guards are 'Sir!', known as pay sergeants in the Grenadier Guards and so on and so on ......... Thanks for that General Grumpy Sir Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now