jay dubaya Posted 11 December , 2006 Share Posted 11 December , 2006 The caption for this published photo reads "The 'shell scandal' of 1915 being tackled". Has anyone got any information reguarding this, cheers, Jon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alliekiwi Posted 11 December , 2006 Share Posted 11 December , 2006 Basically, in early 1915 Sir John French, the then Commander in Chief of the British forces, blamed the loss of a battle offensive on not having enough munitions shells. The press had a field day, and eventually munitions production lines were revamped so production was more efficient and greatly increased (This included employing women in the factories). But not before the government fell. French was replaced by Haig, partially I'm sure for bleating to the press and causing all the political upheaval. Allie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alliekiwi Posted 11 December , 2006 Share Posted 11 December , 2006 Here's a link that tells you about it on the First World War site: Shell Scandal Meanwhile, the National Archives glossary describe it as: 'Shell scandal' Term given to the press and Conservative Party campaign - based on the apparent shortage of shells on the Western Front - against Asquith's Liberal government in the spring of 1915. It resulted in the formation of a coalition government on 25 May. Allie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jay dubaya Posted 11 December , 2006 Author Share Posted 11 December , 2006 Here's a link that tells you about it on the First World War site: Shell Scandal Meanwhile, the National Archives glossary describe it as: Allie Thanks for that Allie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now