Guest Bux Boy Posted 9 September , 2003 Share Posted 9 September , 2003 Whilst researching a Pte 7606 Albert Taverner 2nd O&BLI I discovered that another man had the same regimental number, the details of the two men are:- 1. Pte 7606 Albert Taverner, went to France 31/8/14 with the 2nd O&BLI. Transfered to 3rd Hants(a clearing Btn at Gosport) 28/5/15 and was discharged 3/11/15. Entitles to 1914 Star trio. 2. Pte 7606 Frederick Foreman, enlisted 1904, to France 1914 with 2nd O&BLI Killed in action 25/9/15. Does anybody have any explanation why two men would be serving in the same Battalion with the same number? I have checked with the Research & Archive section of The Ox & Bucks Museum and to date they have been unable to answer the question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Annette Burgoyne Posted 9 September , 2003 Share Posted 9 September , 2003 Hi Bux Boy I have come across the same with the K.S.L.I. It only seems to be with those who were pre war Soldiers, I have never come across it with men who enlisted in August 1914 and afterwards. I am also interested to know why men of the same Regiment and in many case the same Battalion share a Regt. No. Annette Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muerrisch Posted 9 September , 2003 Share Posted 9 September , 2003 Easy. Line infantry only, and inevitably some exceptions. Regulars bns shared one series, started 0 in 1882, many had reached about 10 000 in Aug 1914. Regular Reservists retained their old number. New Army men numbered in regular series and regarded as regulars with a short-term engagement. Special Reserve had separate series, 0 in 1908, many had reached about 7000 in 1914 because turnover was rapid. Some had a 3/ prefix, some did not. Each TF bn had its own separate series, again 0 in 1908, numbers like 4000 each bn in 1914. As and when men from these three sources met in a battalion, you had umpteeniplication. Right from 5 Aug 1914 heavy takeup of SR men as individual augmentees by Line bns because the Reserve was not big enough. Thus 1RWF had hundreds [literally] of SR on the ship to Zeebrugge October 1914. See my forthcoming article Stand To! on subject. Your duplication may well be a regular and a SR man. Later in war, all three types of men stirred and mixed in units. And of course TF renumbered [gross simplification] in 1917. More if needs be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now