Jump to content
Free downloads from TNA ×
The Great War (1914-1918) Forum

Remembered Today:

Glory Hole to Disappear?


Paul Reed

Recommended Posts

One of the largest areas of preserved mine craters on the British sector of the Western Front is seriously under threat; I happened to pass by the field which the British called 'The Glory Hole' today; it was an area of mining activity prior to the Somme in 1915/16. There is an extensive collection of different sized craters inside, in a very good state and in some cases remnants of trenches inbetween.

I was alarmed to see a commericial sign up indicating that a substantial house is about to be constructed on this site; perhaps the first of many. Another is being built in an adjacent field.

I fear that as - seemingly - permission to build has already been granted by the mairie in Ovillers (la Boisselle is part of the commune of Ovillers la Boisselle), then it may already be too late? However, I would appreciate being put in touch with the All Parties War Graves Group (or whatever it is called) who, I thought, was meant to be keeping an eye on things like this? And anyone with any detailed knowledge of French planning law.

I am going to contact the Conseil General de la Somme, but I suspect their wheels may move slowly.

I cannot believe that a site of such historical importance can be allowed to go in the 90th anniversary year of the Somme.

Below - general view towards the Glory Hole, taken today.

post-6-1136681703.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's alarming news Paul. I am quite surprised that permission has been granted to build there. The danger of the ground subsiding must be fairly high. It's a pity that there isn't another Richard Dunning out there to buy it. I any case I wouldn't want to build a house there !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's alarming news Paul. I am quite surprised that permission has been granted to build there. The danger of the ground subsiding must be fairly high. It's a pity that there isn't another Richard Dunning out there to buy it. I any case I wouldn't want to build a house there !

If no house were built where fights took place a large part of North of France would be a desert ...

especialy if we consider this also for WWII ...

For the place itself there should be a document in the town hall (la Mairie) which indicates where houses could be built . This is called a POS (former documents) or a PLU (recent ones).

It gives where the town will grow in the next ten years and what could be built in each area of the village

This document is always available for anyone in the town hall.

It is decided by the town concil. However "public enquiry" is always done befor being official.

It let everybody to say I do not agre with that because ....

This is the key, the referee, for everybody.

I know this quite well, I am member of the town council of my village....

Kind regards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is extremely bad news. We have already lost the Carnoy and most of the Redan craters. I hope that the local authorities can be persuaded that in the long term this area is more valuable to them preserved than destroyed.

The ground beneath this area has both German and British underground systems. The British has at least three underground levels at around 30, 50 and 100 feet depth. Click on this image for a section of the British system.

th_76157_DSCF0245CropEnh.jpg

There will be a very substantial quantity of human remains, many of which are French, as the French lost several thousand men here attacking the village in 1914-15. There are tunnellers still in the mines.

Simon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yves. I am referring specifically to the Glory Hole. You no doubt know the history of this particular patch of land. It is honeycombed with tunnels and old dugouts, hence my remark, not the entire western front as you say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one is saying we should preserve the whole battlefield; this particular part is extremely well preserved and it would be criminal if it were lost, in my opinion as both a local to the area and an historian.

Thanks to Simon Jones the All Party Parliamentary War Graves and Battlefields Heritage Group have been alerted and will be reacting accordingly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the largest areas of preserved mine craters on the British sector of the Western Front is seriously under threat;

I do not think that we should be imposing our ideas of what should and should not be preserved, on the people of France. The cemeteries and monuments are there in perpetuity. That should be enough. If it is possible to develop land and put it to good use, then I sincerely believe that is what should happen. More to the point perhaps, France is a democracy. These things are done, ultimately, because the French voters wish it. Look around Britain and see the wholesale destruction perpetrated in the name of development. When we have put our own house in order, it will be time to give advice to others. Land has a financial value as well as an historic one. The former will always take precedence as the historic fades from memory. I do not know the site in question but if it is honeycombed with tunnels and craters as suggested, it will be very expensive to develop. If the pressure to build is enough to accept this extra cost , then I do not think there is much can be done to stop the work.The work being carried out by De Diggers is being done , I believe, in advance of development. Is there provision for similar work to be carried out in France?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you Paul for bringing this to the attention of the forum and inparticular to those of us who care about the preservation of the battlefields. Maybe the glory hole does not display the familiar green and white sign of the C.W.G.C but we all know (those who care) that this site is a grave yard!

Somebody once said "opinoins are like ****holes, everybody has one!"

Thanks again Paul your policing of the Somme battlefields is much appreciated.

Steve Binks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This site should certainly be preserved. As has been said, no one is suggesting that the Somme should be preserved in its entirety but sites such as this are surely very special. They need to be designated as such.

I presume the site has a certain value as a building plot and the owner is wanting to realise these monies or has applied for the planning permission himself. It such permission is denied , the land owner deserves compensation. The problem is who would pay ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not think that we should be imposing our ideas of what should and should not be preserved, on the people of France. The cemeteries and monuments are there in perpetuity. That should be enough. If it is possible to develop land and put it to good use, then I sincerely believe that is what should happen. More to the point perhaps, France is a democracy. These things are done, ultimately, because the French voters wish it. Look around Britain and see the wholesale destruction perpetrated in the name of development. When we have put our own house in order, it will be time to give advice to others. Land has a financial value as well as an historic one. The former will always take precedence as the historic fades from memory. I do not know the site in question but if it is honeycombed with tunnels and craters as suggested, it will be very expensive to develop. If the pressure to build is enough to accept this extra cost , then I do not think there is much can be done to stop the work.The work being carried out by De Diggers is being done , I believe, in advance of development. Is there provision for similar work to be carried out in France?

With respect Tom, I am a resident and landowner on the Somme, so even following your train of thought - which I do not agree with - then I have the perfect right to voice an opinion over this. There is no pressure whatsoever to build on the Somme. Space is vast and land is cheap and in the past two years a number of development companies have been making money by buying land cheap, building houses and selling at a large profit - that selling made possible by the wider availability of finance for people in France. Because of the previous rarity of mortgages, most people rented. Now house ownership is growing.

And there is hardly a shortage of land to build on - even in La Boisselle. I suspect this land came very cheap because it wasn't possible to farm on it and the ignorance of the developers will not have alerted them to the fact that tunnels etc are on this site; in fact, they probably haven't even asked themselves why the holes are there in the first place.

No-one is suggesting we preserve the whole of France, but anyone who has been visiting the Somme for even a few years will have seen how sites have been lost due to the CAP and development. Should we stand by and let this go? I don't think so, and I personally believe our chrildren and grand children would think the poorer of us if we sat back and did nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This site should certainly be preserved. As has been said, no one is suggesting that the Somme should be preserved in its entirety but sites such as this are surely very special. They need to be designated as such.

I presume the site has a certain value as a building plot and the owner is wanting to realise these monies or has applied for the planning permission himself. It such permission is denied , the land owner deserves compensation. The problem is who would pay ?

Ian - this sign simply indicates planning permission has been granted. The name should refer to the client whom the house is being built for. I personally am not sure what can be done yet, but I am confident the All Party Group will be making immediate representations, so we will discover some possible outcomes shortly. The only good news is that no building work has started, but I would say we are only talking about weeks, or months at best before it does start.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That sign is up, so that objections to the project can be lodged within a specified period - 60 days? I can't remember, so why not lodge one?

Jack

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. There is no pressure whatsoever to build on the Somme. Space is vast and land is cheap...

2. ...and the ignorance of the developers will not have alerted them to the fact that tunnels etc are on this site; in fact, they probably haven't even asked themselves why the holes are there in the first place.

Hello Paul,

I share your concerns.

Of the two points quoted by you above:

1. What is it in particular makes this piece of land so attractive to a potential buyer?

2. Perhaps if the developers or more specifically any buyer were to be made aware of this they would have a re-think? The risk of subsidence must be there and would surely affect any future sell on value?

Regards,

Steve.

Edited by Steve Bramley
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whoever protests might like to add the fact that it is a near certainty that there are unexploded charges beneath the site. It was mined and counter-mined for such a long period that some must still lurk below the surace.

Jack

Link to comment
Share on other sites

La Boiselle and its 'Glory Hole' seem part and parcel of the 'Somme Heritage' experience to me. I would argue that its loss would be extremely short sighted.

Whether people like it or not, such sites/sights are very much one of the reasons that so many 'heritage/ancestral/military' tourists come to the Battlefields.

I would have thought the local authority would take note of the increased interest in WW1 and adopted a 'protect' strategy to ensure conservation of such highly emotive/famous sites.

Personally, I think this demonstrates how far sighted the Somme Association were when they took the chance of purchasing Thiepval Wood for future generations.

Des

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With respect Tom, I am a resident and landowner on the Somme, so even following your train of thought - which I do not agree with - then I have the perfect right to voice an opinion over this.

Hi Paul and others. Paul, as a resident, you do indeed have a perfect right to voice your opinion and try your d****est to make it heard . One of the points I was making was that people who do not live in France have very little right to any say on what the French do with their land. Cemeteries and monuments excepted. I should have added that this right extends to all residents. The other point which I made was that, given the problems and expense of developing a plot of land in an area like this, anyone who did must be absolutely determined to do so and have the means to carry out their plans. I am at a loss as to why this land should be developed when you say that there is no pressure to do so. Perhaps it is to be a chambre d'hote for battlefield visitors?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Paul,

You will remember the extent of the expansion of Ovillers has cropped up before. As one who always stays in Ovillers it has been very clear over the last five years that the local Marie has no problem with this - every time I return another house is going up! I guess at the end of the day the Glory Hole is a prime spot and money talks as they say. It would be a crying shame if another prominent site disappeared. Unfortunately, if it is a straight and legitimate deal, short of appealing to the better nature of the landowner to respect the historical importance of the area I do not hold out much hope for it's survival.

If it's that cheap do you fancy going halves???

;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am surprised this spot has been chosen considering the potential issue of human remains, undergound systems, difficulties in just building on such a site, etc. Then there is the historic aspect, which the builder and or owner might be unaware of.

When I was last there the amount of open, easy to build on land was everywhere and it does seem odd to pick a spot with so many difficulties or issues. I wonder if price was a consideration as it would not get the same amount for level land, etc.

I am at a loss to know even where to start. Hopefully as more information comes in we can save whatever is possible. Please keep us advised, thanks Paul.

Ralph

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Many of you are assuming that the French won't build on something because you are presuming that they are aware of its importance and potential problems. The reality is they don't do surveys in the way they do in the UK and are very likely to have no idea that a war was even fought here, let alone an understanding of tunneling operations.

I watched a house in my village be built right on top of a large German dugout which I now estimate to be less than 10 feet from the (basic) foundations of the house. I went and told the builders when they started but they had no interest, and little belief in what I was telling them. One day the house will subside or disappear.

Ovillers seems house building crazy, as Giles has mentioned; the maire has allowed the construction of houses left and right of the old Y Sap mine site; both of which rest on the lip of the crater. The future of those structures can only be estimated at, but I suspect neither house will be then in 100 years; maybe a lot less. If the mairie will let them build there, then they will let them build anywhere it seems.

We can only hope that the All Parties group will have a result.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one is saying we should preserve the whole battlefield; this particular part is extremely well preserved and it would be criminal if it were lost, in my opinion as both a local to the area and an historian.

Thanks to Simon Jones the All Party Parliamentary War Graves and Battlefields Heritage Group have been alerted and will be reacting accordingly.

Paul

My remark was general. Could we built where there was many trench tunnels and deads ?

If the answer was no there would be no villages at all at la Boisselle, Thiepval, Souchez, Loos, and so many towns or villages...

So my thinking is: yes it is possible to build where there were battlefields.

Of course those buidings must be done carefully, because of sleeping weapons, holes or bodies.

I suppose it was done for the Thiepval memorial and the new museum here !

Several places have been protected or bought by the Conseil General of the Somme : Fay village, The crater at La Boisselle for example.

For this specific place I have not seen it yet.

It is why I did not write it should be protected neither it does not need to be kept.

However I understand your point of view: it seems an "interesting" place.

If you are not too far from Ovillers - la Boisselle you can ask to the town hall which part of the area is described as "building possible" or "must be kept as natural area".

If you need some support to understand such document I may help.

You will know if is a small part of the area or the whole which is "building possible".

I hope buildings are only possible along the road we can see on the first picture !

Keep us informed !

Kind regards

Edited by TD60
Link to comment
Share on other sites

more houses means more local taxe d'habitation, then Ovillers will be able to build that jewel in every French village's crown, the 'salle des fetes'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That sign is up, so that objections to the project can be lodged within a specified period - 60 days? I can't remember, so why not lodge one?

Jack

Hello,

This sign up means all official authorization has been given.

The owner, Mr Sauvage (!) could use this authorisation during two years.

Because the authorisation is written at the building place, works will very probably start very soon.

The building company is alredy chosen.

I am afraid it will be very hard now to stop it, unless somebody says I am the real owner of the place !

Kind regards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...