Jump to content
Free downloads from TNA ×
The Great War (1914-1918) Forum

Remembered Today:

Brodie type helmet ID


corkhead100

Recommended Posts

This is a photo of a sand finished helmet (bottom right) which I was comparing with the helmet in question. This helmet is 100% American, liner and shell, I had just naturally

assumed that the finish was as well.

It is a finish that I have only seen on American helmets on ebay.

Ihope that I have not offended Chris by questioning this, but I find it is very educational

Best regards to all,  Malc.

http://photos.groups.yahoo.com/group/milit...view=t&.hires=t

If U.S. didn't use sand, can anybody explain this helmet that I bought from a seller in Ohio,? marked ZE or ZF44 with a liner that is clearly marked A.J. Bates, Webster, Mass.

Best regards, Malc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If U.S. didn't use sand, can anybody explain this helmet that I bought from a seller in Ohio,?  marked ZE or ZF44 with a liner that is clearly marked A.J. Bates, Webster, Mass.

Best regards,     Malc.

Malc,

The US helmets did not have sand as a factory applied finish. Telling the difference between a sanded or sawdusted helmet is more difficult to tell than you might imagine. You can't in a photo and difficult doing a side by side in person comparison without scraping the finish. The sawdust also has a sharp grit finish when applied.

The top image shows an American helmet side by side with a Brit helmet. Very difficult to tell whether the US has sawdust and the Brit has sand. All of my American helmets are the same finish per spec. (Sawdust) Unless of course they were repainted which I have a few repainted.

Both the US and Britain (MKI) used the same method for factory applied paint except for the use of sand or sawdust.

The shells were applied with a durable coat of paint then the sand or sawdust was applied and then the helmet shells were heat dried at 200deg F. for one hour. A second coat was applied with a higher pigment content (Less durable but less reflective).

The bottom photo shows the liners. Like I said in a previuos message all my US helmets have grey top liners and none of my British (which doesn't help to say the original Helmet is 100% British). The British Helmet is not the same as the top helmet. The top helmet is unissued but has the donut. I thought that since this one does not have the donut it would be more similar to the American Helmet.

Also Chris P, the FS 8 technically does not refer to batch or lot. The British Helmet specification calls for the shell to be marked with manufacturers initials and heat number. So what is the difference between heat number and batch? (only a minor difference) Heat refers to all the steel put a through a single heating in any particular furnace. These could include several batches of steel, or lots of partcular steel. So the number can be used chrnologically for a manufactureer but does not refer to a particular lot of steel and more reflects the furnace usage.

Joe Sweeney

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Malc,

The US helmets did not have sand as a factory applied finish. Telling the difference between a sanded or sawdusted helmet is more difficult to tell than you might imagine. You can't in a photo and difficult doing a side by side in person comparison without scraping the finish.  The sawdust also has a sharp grit finish when applied.

The top image shows an American helmet side by side with a Brit helmet. Very difficult to tell whether the US has sawdust and the Brit has sand.  All of my American helmets are the same finish per spec. (Sawdust) Unless of course they were repainted which I have a few repainted.

Both the US and Britain (MKI) used the same method for factory applied paint except for the use of sand or sawdust.

The shells were applied with a durable coat of paint then the sand or sawdust was applied and then the helmet shells were heat dried at 200deg F. for one hour. A second coat was applied with a higher pigment content (Less durable but less reflective).

The bottom photo shows the liners. Like I said in a previuos message all my US helmets have grey top liners and none of my British (which doesn't help to say the original Helmet is 100% British). The British Helmet is not the same as the top helmet. The top helmet is unissued but has the donut. I thought that since this one does not have the donut it would be more similar to the American Helmet.

Also Chris P, the FS 8 technically does not refer to batch or lot. The British Helmet specification calls for the shell to be marked with manufacturers initials and heat number. So what is the difference between heat number and batch? (only a minor difference) Heat refers to all the steel put a through a single heating in any particular furnace. These could include several batches of steel, or lots of partcular steel.  So the number can be used chrnologically for a manufactureer but does not refer to a particular lot of steel and more reflects the furnace usage.

Joe Sweeney

And another one!

http://cgi.ebay.com/WWI-2nd-Division-paint...1QQcmdZViewItem

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kinda makes you think that the heavy sand finish might be an american

thing, don't it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kinda makes you think that the heavy sand finish might be an american

thing, don't it?

Dear Corkster

You've obviously got a bee in your bonnet about this - and are making two assumptions:

1. eBay vendors know what they're talking about; and

2. Joe Sweeney, for instance, doesn't.

In this context, the two things are obviously incompatible, but I'll tell you what: if my house depended on it, I'd believe Joe - a dealer in fact rather than supposition - rather than an eBay vendor everyday of the week.

Best wishes,

Grovetown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well said Mr G. So far the links have all been US helmets turning up in the US (WOW)! Or all Brit ...........

Nothing personal corkers, but I'd quit while you're behind! Joes information is based on written records & research, not grainy eBay pics..........

Incidentally, the buyer of the helmet that started all this was aware it was/maybe a US liner, & wanted it as such.......so all's well, that ends well.

ChrisP.

PS : Grovetown: You lucky, lucky b*****. You know what I mean!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PS : Grovetown: You lucky, lucky b*****. You know what I mean!
Chris - do you mean the 'two piece'? If so, yes - quite amazing really.

Best wishes,

GT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Grovey,

I am not trying to offend or upset anyone, especially not Joe, whose knowledge and expertise I have the greatest respect for , I

have learned a lot from Joe, and long may it continue. But I feel that the

question of the heavy sand finish , eg. an even sand coating applied on to the

paint,and clearly visable as sand, and not sand under or with-in a painted finish, remains unclear to me. The explanation I seek is, Why did the vast majority of these helmets end up in the states, or at the very least

quite a lot of them seem to end up in America. This is based on photographs and descriptions of helmets seen on U.S. ebay against the much smaller amount seen on UK ebay.

I use ebay because I think it is a reasonable gauge of the respective markets, and this does lead me to suspect that some part of the U.S. military was using this finish, also a lot of these are U.S. manufacture.

Is it a bad thing to question, instead of blindly accepting?

I must stress that I refer to the photos, that clearly show this finish,

not just the sellers description.

All the best, Malc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll speak out in defense of Corkhead...

I collect Canadian painted helmets. I have bought and sold many British and American made Brodie helmets and I have observed a variation finish that is similar to what corkhead initially asked about - ie a heavy SAND finish, (like cement). I have only seen this on helmets used by Americans. I think many US used helmets were repainted at some point and could easily have had a further application of sand or sawdust or whatever was handy before the unit marking was added. Likely this finish was applied at the unit level and not the factory. Furthermore, several of my Canadian helmets clearly have been repainted with SAWDUST added to the finish. ..Chris P's British made shell with US liner was something I hadn't noticed before but clearly there is room for further research...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello John,

Thanks for that.

As you say, I think there is room for further research.

Best regards, Malc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hope no one got the impression that any kind of offense was taken.

Debate is a very healthy thing amongst collector's and Chris's helmet sure did raise a bit of debate.

Joe Sweeney

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It certainly did Joe, and I look forward to many more debates in the future.

By the way, have you bought any nice tin hats lately?

Best wishes, Malc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Malc,

I've actually probably not bought a helmet in 10 to 15 years.

I can actually remember that one. It was a rimless helmet (relined with MKI liner and Chin strap) with 13Bn CEF flash on it and I'd. Only one owner prior to family sell.

take care,

Joe Sweeney

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Blimey!.......... wasn't expecting that! 10 to 15 years?!

Probably time to take aleaf out of your book, I seem to buy all sorts of junk!!

Best regards, Malc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

"The shell is 100% British. The liner could be? What maybe odd is the top lining apears to be grey wool. All my American Helmets have Grey Wool and none of my British." (post #7)

This posed a question in my mind as to wether British liners were produced with grey lwool pads, the following link shows an all British helmet with red Brodie marking in the liner, and Grey felt dome pad.

...............just thought I'd share this. Malc.

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vie...AMEWA%3AIT&rd=1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hello, this is my first post here and I'm a fairly new collector of military gear, although I have collected guns and knives for years. I found this thread while researching my WWI helmet. I believe it is also a British helmet, with the US-made liner by A.J. Bates, Webster, Massachussetts. It is marked "LS 18." I'm posting some photos of the helmet before I cleaned it up some, for any information you may have on it.

Thank you!post-9518-1133749982.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is the mark on the liner.

Hi,

I'm sorry but my computor is out of action at the moment, should be back on line later this week,

All the best, Malc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Thank you, Malc.

Hi, sorry I haven't got back sooner, email me your postal address and I will send you a copy of Marcus Cotton's article ( a mine of information on British Brodies)

Best regards Malc

email...... malcnicholson@Wight365.net.

Edited by corkhead100
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...