Jump to content
Free downloads from TNA ×
The Great War (1914-1918) Forum

Remembered Today:

Prussian cap what Regiment?


Stani

Recommended Posts

Dear Stani,

It looks very much like a Maker's name and a Size number, to me.

Sorry to disappoint.

Kindest regards,

Kim.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say, but I am far from sure, "Brbg Stab 1 D 1 Esc".

Jan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I bought the cap with a jacket and trousers.
This is how it was on the mannequin, I will publish pants later.
It would be nice if you could help me determine if it's a set or just not compatible.

Stani

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, charlie2 said:

It looks like Drag(oner) StahI II, 1.Esc(adron) to me

Very well possible as well...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Such a set was on the mannequin before it came to me.
My question is does it all fit together?
I would love to put it on a mannequin at home and it would be nice if it all made sense :-)

Stani

IMG_20221112_134412_11zon.jpg

IMG_20221112_134423_11zon.jpg

IMG_20221112_134427_11zon.jpg

IMG_20221112_134435_11zon.jpg

IMG_20221112_134446_11zon.jpg

IMG_20221112_134513_11zon.jpg

IMG_20221112_134522_11zon.jpg

IMG_20221112_134532_11zon.jpg

IMG_20221112_134608_11zon.jpg

IMG_20221112_134627_11zon.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Stani said:

This is what my friend from Germany, a collector, wrote to me.

Dragoner Stahl 2 Kompanie 1 Eskadron

Stani

That looks correct to me, it’s also exactly what @charlie2said earlier in the thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, FROGSMILE said:
30 minutes ago, Stani said:

 

That looks correct to me, it’s also exactly what @charlie2said earlier in the thread.

It sounds good, but is wrong. Kavallerie units like Dragoner never had Kompanien. They had Escadrons instead as equivalent. That´s why Escadron is correct, but Kompanie is impossible. If it is Stahl, then it could be Stahl 2 meaning that there were (at least) two men of the same name in the 1st Escadron, this cap being the one of Stahl 2. I think Charlie mentioned that possibility above.

GreyC

 

Edited by GreyC
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, FROGSMILE said:

That looks correct to me, it’s also exactly what @charlie2said earlier in the thread.

No, It is Dragoner Stahl II 1. Eskadron (the "II" behind the name indicates there were at least 2 men with the name Stahl and this cap belonged to the second one).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, AOK4 said:

No, It is Dragoner Stahl II 1. Eskadron (the "II" behind the name indicates there were at least 2 men with the name Stahl and this cap belonged to the second one).

That’s surprising.  Did they not have regimental service numbers for such identification purposes?

3 minutes ago, GreyC said:

It sounds good, but is wrong. Kavallerie units like Dragoner never had Kompanien. They had Escadrons instead as equivalent. That´s why Escadron is correct, but Kompanie is impossible. If it is Stahl, then it could be Stahl 2 meaning that there were (at least) two men of the same name in the 1st Escadron, this cap being the one of Stahl 2. I think Jan mentioned that possibility above.

GreyC

 

Thank you GreyC, you and Jan have made it clear now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gentlemen, thanks for your help, now everything is clear.

One more question, do the pants match the jacket?:-)

Stani

Edited by Stani
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Stani said:

Gentlemen, thanks for your help, now everything is clear.

One more question, do the pants match the jacket?:-)

Stani

No they definitely do not.

 

10 minutes ago, GreyC said:

I beat you to it, Jan! :D

You did indeed by a few seconds...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, FROGSMILE said:

That’s surprising.  Did they not have regimental service numbers for such identification purposes?

No, not in the sense that we know from the British Army, they had a Stammrollen number - a number on the Muster Roll - which was more often than not stamped on their ID disc. The Muster Rolls were held for each Company and all started with the number 1. The Stammrolle register (see attached) was divided up alphabetically and the number could then be used to access the service record entry.

Charlie

B6AC31C6-4F2B-440F-9E36-CA6AC2ED108E.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uniforms are not my area of expertise but looking through my copy of Knötel & Pietsch I can‘t find an exact match for the cap, which regiment does it belong to?
The national cockade is set very high which suggests the cap had been worn post war and had another badge below the national cockade. The cockade in the middle of the hatband isn‘t from the Imperial Army. 

Charlie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...