Jump to content
Free downloads from TNA ×
The Great War (1914-1918) Forum

Remembered Today:

Trying to Identify Regiment Please


wmfinch

Recommended Posts

Trying to identify regiment for my cousin please.  Any help will be very much appreciated 👍4BB2E8A7-F31A-4324-927F-80E914EDFAE4.jpeg.44fd653b636f439382d7547b2b39cf93.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Life Guards,  or Royal Horse Guards?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The shoulder title on the man on the left looks like it might be an LG for Lifeguards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Michelle Young said:

Life Guards,  or Royal Horse Guards?

Really appreciate your reply 👍

1 minute ago, 6RRF said:

The shoulder title on the man on the left looks like it might be an LG for Lifeguards

Much appreciated … I’ll pass the info on to my cousin 👍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll stick with the Lifeguards per the shoulder title on the man on the left. It may not be the clearest photie I've ever seen but it looks like an LG to me rather than an AVC

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you have a name you could cross reference to the medal index cards re the corps 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, 6RRF said:

I'll stick with the Lifeguards per the shoulder title on the man on the left. It may not be the clearest photie I've ever seen but it looks like an LG to me rather than an AVC

 

 

The Life Guards cap badge is smaller than those in the photo and has an unbroken title circle below the crown. The badges in the photo have a gap below the crown between the ends of the wreath. The shoulder titles will be AVC.   Pete.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Army Veterinary Corps.  They’re both dressed typically for such photos.  Whitened lanyards often seen at left shoulder and securing the cap badge in place by splitting the chin strap above and below seems to have been de rigeur.

NB.  Early in the war the Life Guards wore either a 1 or a 2 above their LG shoulder title.

C17C8C67-054F-446A-8114-7FCBAA6F6AA3.jpeg

5B2D20D6-CDE7-4F9D-9E80-1E0FED19BDEE.jpeg

6E353FAA-3B85-46C3-910B-806C26535AC3.jpeg

6EFBFC79-8873-45E4-A0C5-9DFA3CA34D09.jpeg

5ED9C579-2610-44D2-9ADC-238977E47843.jpeg

Edited by FROGSMILE
Spelling error
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, CorporalPunishment said:

They are Army Veterinary Corps.      Pete.

Would they have worn spurs Pete?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, wmfinch said:

Would they have worn spurs Pete?

?? As per the AVC images posted just above.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, CorporalPunishment said:

Yes, when dealing with horses.      Pete.

Ah, this is starting to make sense.  Regarding my cousin, she found the photo after her parents had died and is trying to find a connection to her side of the family, who are very ‘horse minded’ 👍

1 hour ago, FROGSMILE said:

?? As per the AVC images posted just above.

Yes 👍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wmfinch said:

Ah, this is starting to make sense.  Regarding my cousin, she found the photo after her parents had died and is trying to find a connection to her side of the family, who are very ‘horse minded’ 👍

Yes 👍

They were a mounted-duties corps as a whole (like e.g. the ASC) and so when properly dressed for ‘walking-out’, or in full dress, wore spurs.  So hence also carrying a whip rather than a swagger stick.  It was also reflected via a cavalry ‘style’, double stripe down the outside of full dress breeches & pantaloons, plus dragoon pattern cuff embellishment.

847FC90D-53FC-4C46-AFE0-3382C7B58575.jpeg

E7451FC2-0BF9-4A2D-8E27-8CBF27C90F8A.jpeg

Edited by FROGSMILE
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, FROGSMILE said:

They were a mounted duties corps as a whole (like e.g. the ASC) and so when properly dressed for walking out, or in full dress, wore spurs.  

 

Would mounted duty soldiers, when walking out, have the option of wearing shoes (or boots), no spurs and normal parallel trousers?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PhilB said:

Would mounted duty soldiers, when walking out, have the option of wearing shoes (or boots), no spurs and normal parallel trousers?

Not at that time no.  I’ve sometimes seen soldiers at home (front parlour etc) who have had a photo taken with trousers loose and without puttees, but it wasn’t of course correct walking-out-dress Phil.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, FROGSMILE said:

Not at that time no.  I’ve sometimes seen soldiers at home (front parlour etc) who have had a photo taken with trousers loose and without puttees, but it wasn’t of course correct walking-out-dress Phil.

 

C8F69F02-9CC8-4973-963A-9199A06ABA5C.jpeg

3C50B7CA-4910-4E74-874C-06E77A0CBB5F.jpeg

E5CD2A65-7C45-4D4B-BC68-CAA4D45651CB.jpeg

Edited by FROGSMILE
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, PhilB said:

Thanks, Frog. Would any man from any regiment or corps always be required to wear puttees and boots when walking out?

At that time, when in Service Dress, yes.   Before the issue of puttees on the home establishment (effectively after the 2nd Boer War) leather leggings were worn, but walking out dress had still involved coloured uniform.  In other words puttees coincided with the switch to walking-out in SD.

Edited by FROGSMILE
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...