battle of loos Posted 5 December , 2021 Share Posted 5 December , 2021 good morning, being from Loos, I am therefore interested in the battle of the same name, I can tell you that the slag heaps at that time were flat like that of the "double crassiers" or the "fosse 15-15bis - Tower bridge". less than 10 meters high. the only one to my knowledge that was very high at that time (pyramid-shaped) in this sector, is that of the "Philosophe - Vermelles". regards michel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteStarLine Posted 5 December , 2021 Share Posted 5 December , 2021 Here is a good April 1918 image of Fosse 8 (obliterated) and The Dump, confirming just what a large and dominating feature it represented. Taken by 2 Squadron RAF courtesy IWM / WFA. Each grid line is 500 yards so this extract is 1,000 x 500. Click to enlarge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaulTudge1916 Posted 5 December , 2021 Share Posted 5 December , 2021 13 hours ago, brianmorris547 said: look on the Long Long Trail under Battles, find the Divisions involved and then search the War Diaries of the Divisional HQ General Staff and of the Infantry Brigades. Thanks. I'll look there. PT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david murdoch Posted 6 December , 2021 Share Posted 6 December , 2021 Fosse 8 de Bethune. | WW1 PARCELS TO THE FRONT & LETTERS HOME (istworldwarhibbettletters.com) The Dump is mentioned in this article and as being 20ft high. The Dump: a 20ft Crassier/ Spoil Heap (Mine ‘deads’) from the Fosse 8 / Pithead; with excellent views in all directions over the British Line. There are several pictures of Crassiers at other mines (majority being Loos Crassier and "Tower Bridge") and they mostly (but not all) to follow the same style of long spread out spoil heaps but not very high, compared to pit "bings" we would see in UK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brianmorris547 Posted 11 December , 2021 Share Posted 11 December , 2021 On 05/12/2021 at 21:44, PaulTudge1916 said: Thanks. I'll look there. PT Paul The WD of 2 Div HQ GS (WO 95/1287 - Ancestry p 205 to 207/633) has a map from the La Basee Canal to Hill 70. It is in three parts and marked Situation 26/09/1915. Brian Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaulTudge1916 Posted 11 December , 2021 Share Posted 11 December , 2021 Thanks Brian. Does it show the British lines in decent detail? PT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KernelPanic Posted 11 December , 2021 Share Posted 11 December , 2021 (edited) 5 hours ago, brianmorris547 said: The WD of 2 Div HQ GS (WO 95/1287 - Ancestry p 205 to 207/633) has a map from the La Basee Canal to Hill 70. It is in three parts and marked Situation 26/09/1915. Brian Brian, Thanks for this reference, particular the Ancestry indexing, which is very helpful! 1 hour ago, PaulTudge1916 said: Thanks Brian. Does it show the British lines in decent detail? PT Paul, Parts of the 2 Division HQ map that Brian identified appear to be the same as 3 1915 maps at McMaster that are 'as of' July/August 1915. They show the German trench lines (in red) with the Hohenzollen Redoubt at the top of the maps. I think the British lines are shown by a single dashed black line. However, one of them (PC0084WW1MAP) 'appears' (and I could be wrong) to have the British lines detailed in black (25-08-1915). Is this what you are looking for? Edited 11 December , 2021 by KernelPanic typo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaulTudge1916 Posted 11 December , 2021 Share Posted 11 December , 2021 35 minutes ago, KernelPanic said: However, one of them (PC0084WW1MAP) 'appears' (and I could be wrong) to have the British lines detailed in black (25-08-1915). Is this what you are looking for? Yes it appears to show British lines but unfortunately doesnt name them PT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteStarLine Posted 12 December , 2021 Share Posted 12 December , 2021 2 hours ago, PaulTudge1916 said: but unfortunately doesnt name them However, it looks to be very similar to the one posted by Brian earlier in this thread which does provide names. Courtesy IWM / WFA, undated map, click to enlarge: Notes: 36C [parts of][no title]Annotated. In 4 pieces. No date Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A Lancashire Fusilier by Proxy Posted 23 December , 2021 Share Posted 23 December , 2021 On 05/12/2021 at 11:16, WhiteStarLine said: Here is a good April 1918 image of Fosse 8 (obliterated) and The Dump, confirming just what a large and dominating feature it represented. Taken by 2 Squadron RAF courtesy IWM / WFA. Each grid line is 500 yards so this extract is 1,000 x 500. By my reckoning, this makes the short south westerly extreme edge of the Fosse about 100 yards in width. To quote a bit more from Chapter 13 of With a Machine Gun to Cambrai, including putting into context the section quoted in my first post on this thread, Coppard begins the chapter: "We went up to the front line again, a little to the left of the redoubt. The dominating feature here was Fosse 8, a black heap of coal waste about eighty to one hundred feet high, and, if my memory serves me, well over a hundred yards long. The two front lines were very close, less than a hundred yards apart, and, with the big Fosse looming up directly in front of us, we felt naked and wide open to enemy observation ..." I presume that the reference to "left" must be taken to mean "to the left when viewed from the British front line". If so, it is hard to see how the position described would be to the the left of the redoubt, as, if they were to the left of the redoubt, they would have been opposite the buildings rather than the slag heap, which latter would have been away over to the other side of the redoubt. If they were to the right of the redoubt, they might well have been facing the short wouth westerly edge of the Fosse, which, as mentioned above, seems to have measured about 100 yards, but surely it would be more natural to say that the Fosse was 100 yards wide from that angle, rather than 100 yards long? And then there is the puzzling measurement of 80 to 100 feet for the height of the Fosse, which does seem to refer to the height of the slag heap itself, not any chimney or other tall feature. So, unless I am misunderstanding any part of the quoted extract, or the nature of the features on the ground, it does seem that the passage of 50 years had played tricks on Coppard's perception of the scene. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donald Gillies Posted 25 October , 2023 Share Posted 25 October , 2023 Sorry to be late to the topic. Attached is a contemporary map drawn up by an orderly of the position of the 7th Seaforths at the Redoubt with a specific mark given for the fall of Capt Robertson Kerr Clark. You can see the German machine gun positions on Fosse 8 must have made those attacking extremely vulnerable and likely accounts for much of the appalling losses that morning (25th Sept 1915). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brianmorris547 Posted 26 October , 2023 Share Posted 26 October , 2023 I have been reading the accounts of the attack by 46 Div on Fosse 8 on 13/10/1915. I think I have mentioned on another thread about the aerial photographs that are in the WD of 139 Infantry Brigade. There is also this map of Fosse 8 and The Dump. TNA/Ancestry WO 95/2692 - 139 IB. Brian Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now