AndyBsk Posted 2 August , 2021 Share Posted 2 August , 2021 Could be done for easier attach on rifle adapter, or something else as You listed it here. Kar98a is hard to believe as the adapter is identical. 4cm long Mauser type.Question is too what was done with locking lug as not flashed with pommel, press button is partly unscrewed? maybe it was done by adding the non usable locking lug? working on pommel? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andreas Scheuchzer Posted 30 January , 2022 Author Share Posted 30 January , 2022 the bayonet is easy to mount on the Manlicher M95 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyBsk Posted 30 January , 2022 Share Posted 30 January , 2022 Mannlicher 95 is unreal wout a barell ring it would not hold as the adapter is short for good fixing of a heavy bayonet as S98/05, and its a RLM marked so used by Flak or Luftschutz units. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andreas Scheuchzer Posted 11 April , 2022 Author Share Posted 11 April , 2022 A new and long-awaited piece for my collection. F.Koeller in collaboration with AnkerWerke Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andreas Scheuchzer Posted 11 April , 2022 Author Share Posted 11 April , 2022 And the Pack-Ohliger / CITO / CITO-COLN bayonet group Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyBsk Posted 11 April , 2022 Share Posted 11 April , 2022 Looks like a nice win into collection. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trajan Posted 15 April , 2022 Share Posted 15 April , 2022 (edited) VERY nice! I have not seen the anchor mark before! Julian Edited 15 April , 2022 by trajan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andreas Scheuchzer Posted 27 February , 2023 Author Share Posted 27 February , 2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andreas Scheuchzer Posted 27 February , 2023 Author Share Posted 27 February , 2023 non-standard marked bayonet at blade tang. Anchor and A.W. on sides is a trademark of Anker Werke - Bielefeld Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andreas Scheuchzer Posted 27 February , 2023 Author Share Posted 27 February , 2023 Rarely seen manufacturer. Emil Hermes-Ern from Solingen. Here in collaboration with H. Mundlos. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyBsk Posted 27 February , 2023 Share Posted 27 February , 2023 Nice pieces in report, the first one is already reworked in Weimar period visible on blueing and 1920 stamp. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dok Posted 1 March , 2023 Share Posted 1 March , 2023 Hello everyone Excellent collection 98/05. I have a question about the letter D on one of your bayonets. Are you sure it's L.O.Dietrich. I have the same one, but without co-production with Н. Kaufmann Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andreas Scheuchzer Posted 1 March , 2023 Author Share Posted 1 March , 2023 yes, I am convinced that this is L.O. Dietrich Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyBsk Posted 1 March , 2023 Share Posted 1 March , 2023 (edited) Unfortunally no visible the pommel proof which could be compared with other L.O. Dietrich stamp. But when there is a similar proof it should be then a finisher of the piece. Edited 1 March , 2023 by AndyBsk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dok Posted 1 March , 2023 Share Posted 1 March , 2023 (edited) Очень редкий вариант 98/05. Представляю вам на обозрение свой буше на букву Д. Но я еще не до конца уверен, что это ЛО Дитрих Edited 12 April , 2023 by Dok Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dok Posted 1 March , 2023 Share Posted 1 March , 2023 This bayonet seems to be the only one in the world, in any case, I have never come across it anywhere else Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyBsk Posted 1 March , 2023 Share Posted 1 March , 2023 (edited) Similar bayonets are still on various places but were to this time not reported on internet, some of them are missing the maker mark. Similar are not so prefered to collecting as the normal maker stamped. D proof should be compared with Demag piece. The left ricasso marking is too small,not visible details. I assume this piece is printed in Voronov book. Edited 1 March , 2023 by AndyBsk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dok Posted 1 March , 2023 Share Posted 1 March , 2023 I totally agree with you Andy. We don't know much yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dok Posted 1 March , 2023 Share Posted 1 March , 2023 24 minutes ago, AndyBsk said: Подобные штыки все еще находятся в разных местах, но до сих пор о них не сообщалось в Интернете, на некоторых из них отсутствует клеймо производителя. Подобные не так предпочитают коллекционировать, как штампует обычный производитель. Доказательство D следует сравнивать с изделием Demag. Левая маркировка рикассо слишком мелкая, не видно деталей. It looks like the letter C Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dok Posted 1 March , 2023 Share Posted 1 March , 2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyBsk Posted 1 March , 2023 Share Posted 1 March , 2023 (edited) Thanks for adding the details, the Voronov book describes the D with Dietrich on page 150 have the R or B letter? as similar proof on W16 on p.151 i assume the D could be for Dietrich Altenburg, question remains how were proofed different period pieces. Here on Your piece is evidently different letter probably D?. The C or G on left ricasso could be deliverer of blade. Edited 1 March , 2023 by AndyBsk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dok Posted 1 March , 2023 Share Posted 1 March , 2023 19 minutes ago, AndyBsk said: Спасибо, что добавили подробности, в книге Воронова описывается буква Д с Дитрихом на странице 150 есть ли буква Р или Б? как аналогичное доказательство на W16 на стр. 151, я предполагаю, что D может быть для Дитриха Альтенбурга, остается вопрос, как были проверены произведения разных периодов. Вот на Вашем листе явно другая буква наверное D?. Буква C или G на левом рикассо может означать лезвие. At Voronov I see bayonets identical to Andreas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dok Posted 1 March , 2023 Share Posted 1 March , 2023 In the same book, on p 382, my bayonet is also presented. It used to be thought to be Durkopp Werke, but I'm sure it has nothing to do with Durkopp Werk. In my thoughts, I am more inclined to L.O. Dietrich, but there is no complete clarity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyBsk Posted 1 March , 2023 Share Posted 1 March , 2023 (edited) Yes the Durkopp hypothesis is probably unreal. Question remains the Dietrich, but could be not confirmed as probably similar proof is not reported in 1916 dated L.O.Dietrich, only explanation would be found dated 1917 or 18 piece proofed with identical letter. Should be inspected the other proofs on crossguard or on end of rifle slot. Edited 1 March , 2023 by AndyBsk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rafal1971 Posted 1 March , 2023 Share Posted 1 March , 2023 I'd like to believe that D is Dietrich, but let's not forget the markings on the Gettoscho bayonets - C.S., B.L.. NA 1914 S.M. Simson Shul??? How do you explain to me that B.L. on M1915 it is Bielefeld because I think so + order documents from the army archives we write to Ian Jakson that he did not try hard enough in searching for the markings Evidence. We need infirmations from the archives confirming these theses I work in science - let's not take the easy way out. Evidence needed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now